Using a prediction approach to assess agreement between two continuous measurements

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 311-314

  Hamilton, Cody ^a   Stamey, James D ^b  

^a EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES   (United States)

^b BAYLOR UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Measure of agreement; Prediction interval

Indexed keywords

ACCEPTABLE LIMIT; CONTINUOUS MEASUREMENTS; MEASURE OF AGREEMENT; MEDICAL LITERATURES; NEW DEVICES; PEAK EXPIRATORY FLOWS; PREDICTION INTERVAL;

ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DATA ANALYSIS; FLOW MEASUREMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PEAK EXPIRATORY FLOW; PREDICTION INTERVAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 70349244654     PISSN: 13871307     EISSN: 15732614     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10877-009-9198-4     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Neder JA, Stein R. A simplified strategy for the estimation of the exercise ventilatory thresholds. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006; 38: 1007-13.
2. McGaughran L, Voss LJ, Oliver R, Petcu M, Schaare P, Barnard JPM, et al. Rapid measurement of blood propofol levels: A proof of concept study. J Clin Monit Comput. 2006; 20: 109-15.
3. Choudhary PK, Nagaraja HN. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies - a review. In: Balakrishnan N, Kannan N, Najaraja HN, editors. Advances in ranking and section, multiple comparisons, and reliability. Boston: Birkhauser, pp. 215-44.
4. Barnhart HX, Haber MJ, Lin LI. An overview on assessing agreement with continuous measurements. J Biopharm Stat. 2007; 17: 529-69.
5. Fleiss JL. The design and analysis of clinical experiments. New York, NY: Wiley.
6. St. Laurent RT. Evaluating agreement with a gold standard in method comparison studies. Biometrics. 1998; 54: 537-45.
7. Lin LI. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics. 1989; 45: 255-68.
8. Muller R, Buttner P. A critical discussion of intraclass correlation coefficients. Stat Med. 1994; 13: 2465-76.
9. Lin LI. Total deviation index for measuring individual agreement with applications in laboratory performance and bioequivalence. Stat Med. 2000; 30: 255-70.
10. Lin LI, Hedayat AS, Sinha B, Yang M. Statistical methods in assessing agreement: Models, issues and tools. J Am Stat Assoc. 2002; 97: 257-70.
11. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; i: 307-10.
12. Liu J, Chow SC. A two-one-sided tests procedure for assessment of individual bioequivalence. J Biopharm Stat. 1997; 7: 49-61.
13. Hamilton C, Stamey J. Using Bland-Altman to assess agreement between two medical devices - don't forget the confidence intervals. J Clin Monit Comput. 2007; 21: 331-3.
14. Bland JM, Altman DG. Agreement between methods of measurement with multiple observation per individual. J Biopharm Stat. 2007; 17: 571-82.
15. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999; 8: 135-60.