Alternative manifestations of actor responses to urban flooding: Case studies from Bradford and Glasgow

Water Science and Technology

Volumn 60, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 77-85

  Cashman, A C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST INDIES   (Jamaica)

Author keywords

Institutional responses; Social capital; Stakeholder engagement; Urban flooding

Indexed keywords

EMERGENCY MEASURES; FLOOD RISKS; PARADIGM SHIFTS; SOCIAL CAPITALS; STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT; UNITED KINGDOM; URBAN AREAS; URBAN FLOODING;

SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

EARLY WARNING SYSTEM; FLOOD CONTROL; FLOODING; HAZARD MANAGEMENT; PARADIGM SHIFT; RISK ASSESSMENT; URBAN AREA; ZONING POLICY;

FLOODING; REVIEW; SOCIAL CAPITAL; URBAN AREA; WATER MANAGEMENT; ARTICLE; CITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNITED KINGDOM;

BRADFORD [BRADFORD (DST)]; BRADFORD [ENGLAND]; ENGLAND; GLASGOW [GLASGOW (ADS)]; GLASGOW [SCOTLAND]; SCOTLAND; UNITED KINGDOM;

CITIES; FLOODS; GREAT BRITAIN; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 70349240488     PISSN: 02731223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2009.283     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Bache, I. & Flinders, M. 2004 Multilevel governance and the study of the British State. Public Policy Adm. 19(1), 31-51.
2. Blanksby, J., Saul, A., Ashley, R., Djordjević, S., Chen, A., Leandro, J., Savić, D., Boonya-aroonnet, S., Maksimović, C. & Prodanović, D. 2007 Integrated Urban Drainage: Setting the Context for Integrated Urban Drainage Modelling In The United Kingdom. Proc. Aquaterra Conference. Amsterdam. February.
3. Bradford 2005 Review to Consider the Future of Water Management and the Associated problems of Flooding in the Bradford District. Bradford: City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council.
4. Cashman, A. 2007a Institutional and Social Responses to Flooding: A Bradford Case Study. Research Report, FRMRC.
5. Cashman, A. 2007b Sustainable Flood Risk management: A Glasgow Case Study - from paralysis to praxis? Research Report, FRMRC.
6. Defra 2005 Making space for water. Taking forward a new government strategy for flood and coastal erosion risk management in England, Consultation Document. London: Department of Environment Food and Rural Affairs.
7. Downton, M. W., Morss, R. E., Wilhelmi, O. V., Gruntfest, E. & Higgins, M. L. 2005 Interactions between scientific uncertainty and flood management decisions: two case studies in Colorado. Environ. Hazards 6, 134-146. (Pubitemid 44307784)
8. EA 2007 Review of 2007 summer floods. Environment Agency, Bristol.
9. EC 2006 Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the assessment and management of floods: COM(2006) 15 European Commission.
10. Green, C. 2004 Flood risk management in the context of Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) Workshop on Flood Prevention and Control on the Yangtze River: State-of-the-art and future developments, Wuhan.
11. Hill, M. & Hupe, P. 2006 Analysing policy processes as multiple governance: accountability in social policy. Policy Polit. 34(3), 557-573. (Pubitemid 44088791)
12. Meijerink, S. 2005 Understanding policy stability and change. The interplay of advocacy coalitions and epistemic communities, windows of opportunity, and Dutch coastal flooding policy 1945-2003. J. Eur. Public Policy 12(6), 1060-1077.
13. NAO 2007 Environment Agency: Building and maintaining river and coastal flood defences in England. Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, HC 528 Session 2006-2007. The Stationery Office, London.
14. Ostrom, E. 1990 Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
15. Ostrom, E. 1999 Institutional rational choice: an assessment of the institutional analysis and development framework. In: Sabatier, P. (ed.) Theories of the Policy Process. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp. 35-71.
16. Penning-Rowsell, E., Johnson, C. & Tunstall, S. 2006 'Signal' from pre-crisis discourse: lessons from UK flooding for global environmental policy change? Global Environ. Change 16, 323-339.
17. Pitt Review 2007 Learning lessons from the 2007 floods. An independent review by Sir Michael Pitt. Interim Report. Dec. Crown copyright.
18. Raedelli, C. 1999 The public policy of the European Union: wither politics of expertise? J. Eur. Public Policy 6(5), 757-774.
19. Richardson, J. 1995 EU water policy. Uncertain agendas, shifting networks, and complex coalitions. In: O'Toole, H. L. & Richardson, J. (eds) Networks for Water Policy (special issue of Environmental Politics), Frank Cass, London, pp. 139-167.
20. Rogers, P. & Hall, A. 2003 Effective Water Governance. TEC Report no. 7, Global Water Partnership, Stockholm.
21. Rosenthal, U. & t'Hart, P. 1998 Flood Responses and Crisis Management in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis. Springer, Heidelberg.
22. Sabatier, P. A. 1987 Knowledge, policy-orientated learning and policy change. An advocacy coalition framework. Knowl. Creation Diffusion Util. 8, 649-692.
23. Sabatier, P. A. 1998 The advocacy coalition framework: revisions and relevance for Europe. J. Eur. Public Policy 5(1), 98-130.
24. Sabatier, P. A. & Jenkin-Smith, H. C. 1999 The advocacy coalition framework: an assessment. In: Sabatier, P. (ed.) Theories of Public Policy. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp. 117-166.
25. Saleth, M. 2006 Understanding water institutions: structure, environment and change process. In: Perret, S., Farolfi, S. & Hassan, R. (eds) Water Governance for Sustainable Development. Earthscan, London.
26. Saleth, M. & Dinar, A. 2004 The Institutional Economics of Water: A Cross-Country Analysis of Institutions and Performance. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
27. SEPA 2002 Flooding in the East End of Glasgow - 30 July 2002. Perth: Scottish Environmental Protection Agency, Edinburgh.
28. The Commission on Global Governance 1995 Our Global Neighbourhood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Tropp, H. 2007 Water governance: trends and needs for new capacity development. Water Policy 9(Suppl. 2), 19-30. (Pubitemid 351262563)