Functional reading acuity and performance: Comparison of 2 accommodating intraocular lenses

Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

Volumn 35, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 1711-1714

  Brown, David ^a   Dougherty, Paul ^a   Gills, James P ^a   Hunkeler, John ^a   Sanders, Donald R ^a   Sanders, Monica L ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; HUMAN; LENS IMPLANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; VISUAL ACUITY;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; AGED; HUMANS; LENS IMPLANTATION, INTRAOCULAR; LENSES, INTRAOCULAR; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PSEUDOPHAKIA; READING; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 70349236178     PISSN: 08863350     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.05.023     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Uusitalo R.J., Brans T., Pessi T., and Tarkkanen A. Evaluating cataract surgery gains by assessing patients' quality of life using the VF-7. J Cataract Refract Surg 25 (1999) 989-994
2. Mönestam E., and Wachtmeister L. The impact of cataract surgery on low vision patients; a population based study. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 75 (1997) 569-576
3. Richter-Mueksch S., Weghaupt H., Skorpik C., Velikay-Parel M., and Radner W. Reading performance with a refractive multifocal and a diffractive bifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 28 (2002) 1957-1963
4. Hütz W.W., Eckhardt B., Röhrig B., and Grolmus R. Reading ability with 3 mulifocal intraocular lens models. J Cataract Refract Surg 32 (2006) 2015-2021
5. Anderson S.J., and Holliday I.E. Night driving: effects of glare from vehicle headlights on motion perception. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 15 (1995) 545-551
6. Bellucci R. Multifocal intraocular lenses. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 16 (2005) 33-37
7. Dogru M., Honda R., Omoto M., Toda I., Fujishima H., Arai H., Matsuyama M., Nishijima S., Hida Y., Yagi Y., and Tsubota K. Early visual results with the 1CU accommodating intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 31 (2005) 895-902
8. Leyland M., and Zinicola E. Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery; a systematic review. Ophthalmology 110 (2003) 1789-1798
9. Montés-Micó R., and Alió J.L. Distance and near contrast sensitivity function after multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 29 (2003) 703-711
10. Nijkamp M.D., Dolders M.G.T., de Brabander J., van den Borne B., Hendrikse F., and Nuijts R.M.M.A. Effectiveness of multifocal intraocular lenses to correct presbyopia after cataract surgery; a randomized controlled trial. Ophthalmology 111 (2004) 1832-1839
11. Keates R.H., Pearce J.L., and Schneider R.T. Clinical results of the multifocal lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 13 (1987) 557-560
12. Pieh S., Lackner B., Hanselmayer G., Zöhrer R., Sticker M., Weghaupt H., Fercher A., and Skorpik C. Halo size under distance and near conditions in refractive multifocal intraocular lenses. Br J Ophthalmol 85 (2001) 816-821
13. Sanders D.R., and Sanders M.L. Visual performance results after Tetraflex accommodating intraocular lens implantation. Ophthalmology 114 (2007) 1679-1684
14. Benjamani Y., and Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Statist Soc B 57 (1995) 289-300
15. Rubin G.S., West S.K., Muñoz B., Bandeen-Roche K., Zeger S., Schein O., and Fried L.P. A comprehensive assessment of visual impairment in a population of older Americans; the SEE study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 38 (1997) 557-568. http://www.iovs.org/cgi/reprint/38/3/557 Accessed June 25, 2009
16. West S.K., Munoz B., Rubin G.S., Schein O.D., Bandeen-Roche K., Zeger S., German P.S., and Fried L.P. Function and visual impairment in a population-based study of older adults; the SEE Project; the SEE Project Team. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 38 (1997) 72-82. http://www.iovs.org/cgi/reprint/38/1/72 Accessed June 25, 2009
17. Legge G.E., Pelli D.G., Rubin G.S., and Schleske M.M. Psychophysics of reading-I. Normal vision. Vision Res 25 (1985) 239-252
18. Whittaker S.G., and Lovie-Kitchin J. Visual requirements for reading. Optom Vis Sci 70 (1993) 54-65
19. Mansfield J.S., Ahn S.J., Legge G.E., and Luebker A. A new reading-acuity chart for normal and low vision. Ophthalmic & Visual Optics/Noninvasive Assessment of the Visual System. Technical Digest 3 (1993), Optical Society of America, Washington, DC 232-235
20. Legge G.E., Ross J.A., Leubker A., and LaMay J.M. Psychophysics of reading. VIII. The Minnesota Low-Vision Reading Test. Optom Vis Sci 66 (1989) 843-853
21. Bailey I.L., and Lovie J.E. The design and use of a new near-vision chart. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 57 (1980) 378-387
22. Radner W., Obermayer W., Richter-Mueksch S., Willinger U., Velikay-Parel M., and Eisenwort B. The validity and reliability of short German sentences for measuring reading speed. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 240 (2002) 461-467
23. Sanders D.R., and Sanders M.L. Near visual acuity for everyday activities with accommodative and monofocal intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg 23 (2007) 747-751