Application of multi-criterion techniques on integral forest management in Durango, México;Aplicación de técnicas multicriterio en el manejo integral forestal en Durango, México

Madera Bosques

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 27-46

  Pérez Verdín, Gustavo ^a   José, Ciro Hernández Díaz ^b   Marco Antonio, Márquez Linares ^a   Aregai, Tecle ^c  

^a INSTITUTO POLITÉCNICO NACIONAL   (Mexico)

^b UNIVERSIDAD JUÁREZ DEL ESTADO DE DURANGO   (Mexico)

^c NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Compromise programming; Desired forest structures; Forest stand dynamics; Los Altares; Multiobjective decisionmaking

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349219928     PISSN: 14050471     EISSN: 14050471     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.21829/myb.2009.1511195     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Alho, J. y J. Kangas. 1997. Analyzing uncertainties in experts' opinions of forest plan performance. Forest Science 43: 521-528.
2. Baker, K.R. 2006. Optimization modeling with spreadsheets. Thomson Brooks/Cole, Belmont, CA.
3. Bojórquez-Tapia, L., E. Ongay-Delhumeau y E. Ezcurra. 1994. Multivariate approach for suitability assessment and environmental conflict resolution. Journal of Environmental Management 41:187-198.
4. Bojórquez-Tapia, L., S. Díaz-Mondragón y E. Ezcurra. 2001. GIS based approach for participatory decision making and land suitability assessment. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 45(2): 129-151.
5. Caballero D., M. 2000. La actividad forestal en México. Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Chapingo, Mex.
6. CONAFOR. 2000. Decreto de creación de la Comisión Nacional Forestal. Disponible en: http://conafor.gob.mx; consultada el 25 de junio de 2008.
7. Crookston, N.L. y G.E. Dixon. 2005. The forest vegetation simulator: A review of its structure, content, and applications. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 49, pp. 60-80.
8. Dixon, G. 2002. Essential FVS: A user's guide to the Forest Vegetation Simulator. Internal Report. Fort Collins, CO. USDA Forest Service, Forest Management Center. 196 p.
9. Duckstein, L. y A. Tecle. 2006. Multi-criterion analysis in water resources management. In: Savenije, H.G. and Hoeksta, A.Y. (Eds) Encyclopedia of life support systems (EOLSS). pp. 1-20. UNESCO, EOLSS publishers. Oxford, Reino Unido.
10. Farjon, A. y B. Styles. 1997. Pinus (Pinaceae). Flora Neotrópica, Monograph 75, New York Botanical Gardens, Nueva York.
11. Goicochea, A., D.R. Hansen y L. Duckstein. 1982. Multiobjective decision analysis with engineering and business applications. John Wiley & Sons, Nueva York.
12. Gingrich, R.W. 1993. The political ecology of deforestation in the Sierra Madre Occidental of Chihuahua. Master of Science Thesis. The University of Arizona. Tucson, AZ.
13. Kangas, J., R. Store, P. Leskinen y Mehtätalo. 2000. Improving the quality of landscape ecological forest planning by utilizing advanced decision-support tools. Forest Ecology and Management 132: 157-171.
14. Kazana, V., F. Bonnieux, P. Campos Palacin, A. Caparrós, L.Croitorou, P. Gatto, A. Kazaklis, M. Merlo, J. C. Paoli y L. Zadnik. 2005. MEDMONT Tools for evaluating investment in the mountain Mediterranean areas An integrated framework for sustainable development. Final Report Edited by the Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Chania (MAI.Ch), Alsyllion Agrokepion, Chania, Grecia.
15. Krcmar, E., G.C. van Kooten y I. Vertinsky. 2005. Managing forest and marginal agricultural land for multiple tradeoffs: compromising on economic, carbon and structural diversity objectives. Ecological Modeling, 185: 451-468.
16. Leskinen, P. y J. Kangas. 1998. Analyzing uncertainties of interval judgment data in multiple-criteria evaluation of forest plans. Silva Fennica 32: 363-372. (Pubitemid 29270819)
17. MárquezLinares, M. A., A. Esparza R., M. González-Elizondo, L. López Enriquez, D. Pámanes G. y D. García M. 2006. Estudio Técnico para el Ordenamiento Ecológico del estado de Durango, fase de pronóstico y propuesta. Inédito. 62 p.
18. Mendoza-Briseño, M.A. 1993. Conceptos básicos de manejo forestal. LimusaUTEHA, Mexico, D.F. 161 p.
19. Mendoza, M. A., J.J. Fajardo y J. Zepeta. 2005. Landscape based forest management, a real world case study from Mexico. Forest Ecology and Management 209(1-2): 19-26.
20. Muñoz-Piña, C, A. Guevara, J.M. Torres, y J. Braña. 2008. Paying for the hydrological services of Mexico's forests: Analysis, negotiations and results. Ecological Economics 65: 725-736.
21. Oliver, C.D. y B.C. Larson. 1996. Forest stand dynamics. John Wiley & Sons, Nueva York. 520 p.
22. Pérez-Verdín, G. y A. Tecle. 2002. Multiobjective forest management in San Miguel, Mexico. Hydrology and Water Resources in Arizona and the Southwest 32: 63-70.
23. Pérez-Verdín, G., M.E. Lee y D. J. Chávez. 2008. Planning forest recreation in natural protected areas of southern Durango, Mexico. Madera y Bosques 14(1): 53-67.
24. Perry, J.P. 1991.The pines of Mexico and Central America. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
25. Ray, N. y M.A. Burgman. 2006. Subjective uncertainties in habitat suitability maps. Ecological modelling 195: 172-186
26. Richardson, D.M. 1998. Ecology and biogeography of Pinus. Cambridge University Press, Nueva York.
27. Rodríguez-Cotilla, Z. 2000.Teoría de la decisión multicriterio: un enfoque para la toma de decisiones. Economía y Desarrollo 1 (126): 41-57.
28. Romesburg, C.H. 1990. Cluster analysis for researchers. Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company, Malabar, FL.
29. SEMARNAT (Secretaría de Recursos Naturales y Medio Ambiente). 2003. Ley General de Desarrollo Forestal Sustentable, y su Reglamento. [Disponible en http://www.conafor.gob.mx/documentos-conafor/pdfs/LGDFS.pdf]
30. Srinivasa Raju, K. y C.R.S. Pillai. 1999. Multicriterion decision making in river basin planning and development. European Journal of Operational Research 112: 249-257.
31. Tecle, A., M. M. Fogel y L. Duckstein. 1988. Multicriterion analysis of forest watershed management alternatives. Water Resources Bulletin 24(6):1169-1178.
32. Tecle, A. 1992. Selecting a multicriterion decision making technique for watershed resources management. Water Resources Bulletin 28 (1): 129-140.
33. Tecle, A., B.P. Shrestha y L. Duckstein. 1998. A multiobjective decision support system for multiresource forest management. Group Decision and Negotiation 7: 23-40.
34. UAF Santiago Papasquiaro. 2005. Propuesta del plan de manejo forestal para el Ejido Los Altares, municipio de Santiago Papasquiaro, Dgo. Reporte no publicado.
35. Yu, P.L. 1973. A class of solutions for group decision problems. Management Science 19 (8): 936-946
36. Zadnik, S. L. 2006. Integrating the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process with dynamic programming approach for determining the optimal forest management decisions. Ecological Modeling 194: 296-305.
37. Zeleny, M. 1974. A concept of compromise solutions and the method of the displaced ideal. Computers and Operations Research 1 (3-4): 479-496.
38. Zeleny, M. 1982. Multiple criteria decision making. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Nueva York.