The professional biologist and advocacy: What role do we play?

Human Dimensions of Wildlife

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 11-19

  DeStefano, Stephen ^a   Steidl, Robert J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

Advocacy; Conservation; Natural Resource Issues

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349214083     PISSN: 10871209     EISSN: 1533158X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10871200152668652     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Adams, P. W., & Hairston, A. B. (1996). Calling all experts: Using science to direct policy. Journal of Forestry, 94, 27-30.
2. DeStefano, S. (1987). The lynx. In R. L. Di Silvestro (Ed.), Audubon Wildlife Report 1987 (pp. 410-422). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
3. Johnson, D. H. (1999). The insignificance of statistical significance testing. Journal of Wildlife Management, 63, 763-772.
4. O’Brien, M. H. (1993). Being a scientist means taking sides. Bioscience, 43, 706-708.
5. Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility [PEER]. (2000). Newsletters from the World Wide Web: http://peer.org/action/.
6. Romesburg, H. C. (1991). On improving the natural resources and environmental sciences. Journal of Wildlife Management, 55, 744-756.
7. Sweeney, J. M., & Stangel, P. W. (1995). Walking the line: Science versus advocacy. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, 60, 1-5.
8. Webster, D. (1993). Webster’s new encyclopedic dictionary. New York: Black Dog and Leventhal Publishers.