Genotype by environment interaction in dairy cattle;Interactions entre génotype et environnement chez les bovins laitiers

Biotechnology, Agronomy, Society and Environment

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 155-164

  Hammami, Hedi ^a,b   Rekik, Boulbaba ^c   Gengler, Nicolas ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

^b Office de l Elevage et des Pâturages   (Tunisia)

^c Higher School of Agriculture of Mateur University of Carthage   (Tunisia)

^d FUND FOR SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Breed; Dairy cattle; Genetic correlation; Genotype by environment interaction; Reaction norm; Selection

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; BOS;

EID: 70349208877     PISSN: 13706233     EISSN: 17804507     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Banos G. & Smith C., 1991. Selection within and across populations in livestock improvement. J. Anim. Sci., 69, 2387-2394.
2. Beerda B. et al., 2007. Effects of genotype by environment interactions on milk yield, energy balance, and protein balance. J. Dairy Sci., 90, 219-228.
3. Berry D.P. et al., 2007. Genetics of grass dry matter intake, energy balance, and digestibility in grazing Irish dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 90, 4835-4845.
4. Boettcher P.J., Fatehi J. & Schutz M.M., 2003. Genotype x environment interactions in conventional versus pasture-based dairies in Canada. J. Dairy Sci., 86, 383-404.
5. Bohmanova J., Misztal I. & Cole J.B., 2007. Temperature-humidity indices as indicators of milk production losses due to heat stress. J. Dairy Sci., 90, 1947-1956.
6. Bondoc O.L., Smith C. & Gibson J.P., 1989. A review of breeding strategies for genetic improvement of dairy cattle in developing countries. Anim. Breed., 57, 819-829.
7. Calus M.P.L., Groen A.F. & de Jong G., 2002. Genotype x environment interaction for protein yield in Dutch dairy cattle as quantified by different models. J. Dairy Sci., 85, 3115-3123.
8. Carabaño M.J., Van Vleck L.D., Wiggans G.R. & Alenda R., 1989. Estimation of genetic parameters for milk and fat yields of dairy cattle in Spain and the United States. J. Dairy Sci., 72, 3013-3022.
9. Carabanõ M.J., Wade K.M. & Van Vleck L.D., 1990. Genotype by environment interactions for milk and fat production across regions of the United States. J. Dairy Sci., 73, 173-180.
10. Castillo-Juárez H. et al., 2000. Effect of herd environment on the genetic and phenotypic relationships among milk yield, conception rate, and somatic cell score in Holstein cattle. J. Dairy Sci., 83, 807-814.
11. Ceron-Munoz M.F. et al., 2004. Factors that cause genotype by environment interaction and use of a multiple-trait herd-cluster model for milk yield of Holstein cattle from Brazil and Colombia. J. Dairy Sci., 87, 2687-2692.
12. Charagu P. & Peterson R., 1998. Estimates of G × E effects for economic efficiency among daughters of Canadian and New Zealand sires in Canadian and New Zealand dairy herds. Interbull Bull., 17, 105-109.
13. Cienfuegos-Rivas E.G. et al., 1999. Interaction between milk yield of Holstein cows in Mexico and the United States. J. Dairy Sci., 82, 2218-2223.
14. Cooper M. & DeLacy I.H., 1994. Relationships among analytical methods used to study genotypic variation and genotype-by-environment interaction in plant breeding multi-environment experiments. Theor. Appl. Genet., 88, 561-572.
15. Costa C.N. et al., 2000. Genetic analysis of Holstein cattle populations in Brazil and the United States. J. Dairy Sci., 83, 2963-2974.
16. Cromie A.R., Kelleher D.L., Gordon F.J. & Rath M., 1998. Genotype by environment interaction for milk production traits in Holstein Friesian dairy cattle in Ireland. Interbull Bull., 17, 100-104.
17. de Jong G., 1995. Phenotypic plasticity as a product of selection in a variable environment. Am. Nat., 145, 493-512.
18. de Jong G. & Bijma P., 2002. Selection and phenotypic plasticity in evolutionary biology and animal breeding. Livest. Prod. Sci., 78, 195-214.
19. Dickerson G.E., 1962. Implications of genetic environmental interaction in animal breeding. Anim. Prod., 4, 47-64.
20. Dimov, G. et al., 1995. Variance of interaction effects of sires and herd for yield traits of Holsteins in California, New York, and Pennsylvania with an animal model. J. Dairy Sci., 78, 939-946.
21. Falconer D.S., 1952. The problem of environment and selection. Am. Nat., 86, 293-298.
22. th ed. Harrow, UK: Longman.
23. Fatehi J., Stella A., Shannon J.J. & Boettcher P.J., 2003. Genetic parameters for feet and leg traits evaluated in different environments. J. Dairy Sci., 86, 661-666.
24. Fikse W.F., Rekaya R. & Weigel K.A., 2003. Genotype × environment interaction for milk production in Guernsey cattle. J. Dairy Sci., 86, 1821-1827.
25. Fulkerson W.J., Hough G., Goddard M. & Davison T., 2000. The productivity of Friesian cows: effects of genetic merit and level of concentrate feeding. Final Report - DAN 082. Wollongbar, Australia: Wollongbar Agricultural Institute.
26. Gernand E., Waßmuth R., von Borstel U.U. & König S., 2007. Heterogeneity of variance components for production traits in large-scale dairy farms. Livest. Prod. Sci., 112, 78-89.
27. Haskell M.J., Brotherstone S., Lawrence A.B. & White I.M.S., 2007. Characterization of the dairy farm environment in Great Britain and the effect of the farm environment on cow life span. J. Dairy Sci., 90, 5316-5323.
28. Hayes B.J., Carrick M., Bowman P. & Goddard M.E., 2003. Genotype x environment interaction for milk production of daughters of Australian dairy sires from test-day records. J. Dairy Sci., 86, 3736-3744.
29. Hill W.G., Edwards M.R., Ahmed M.K.A. & Thompson R., 1983. Heritability of milk yield and composition at different levels and variability of production. Anim. Prod., 36, 59-69.
30. Horan B. et al., 2004. The effect of strain of Holstein-Friesian cow and feed system on reproductive performance in seasonal-calving milk production systems. Anim. Sci., 79, 453-468.
31. Horan B. et al., 2005. The interaction of strain of Holstein-Friesian cows and pasture-based feed systems on milk yield, body weight, and body condition score. J. Dairy Sci., 88, 1231-1243.
32. Horan B. et al., 2006. The effect of strain of Holstein-Friesian dairy cow on grass intake and milk production in various pasture-based systems. Anim. Sci., 82, 435-444.
33. James J.W., 1961. Selection in two environments. Heredity, 16, 145-152.
34. Kirkpatrick M. & Heckman N., 1989. A quantitative genetic model for growth, shape, reaction norms, and other infinite-dimensional characters. J. Math. Biol., 27, 429-450.
35. Kolmodin R.E. et al., 2002. Genotype by environment interaction in Nordic dairy cattle studied using reaction norms. Acta Agric. Scand. A Anim. Sci., 52, 11-24.
36. Kolver E.S. et al., 2002. Total mixed rations versus pasture diets: evidence for a genotype x diet interaction in dairy cow performance. Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod., 62, 246-251.
37. König S., Dietl G., Raeder I. & Swalve H.H., 2005. Genetic relationships for dairy performance between large-scale and small-scale farm conditions. J. Dairy Sci., 88, 4087-4096.
38. Lin C.Y. & Togashi K., 2002. Genetic improvement in the presence of genotype by environment interaction. Anim. Sci. J., 73, 3-11.
39. th world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, January 11-16, 1998, Armidale, Australia, 169-172.
40. Macdonald K.A. et al., 2007. A comparison of three strains of Holstein-Friesian cows grazed on pasture: growth, development, and puberty. J. Dairy Sci., 90, 3993-4003.
41. McCarthy S. et al., 2007a. Influence of Holstein-Friesian strain and feed system on body weight and body condition score lactation profiles. J. Dairy Sci., 90, 1859-1869.
42. McCarthy S. et al., 2007b. Effect of strain of Holstein-Friesian and feed system on udder health and milking characteristics. Livest. Prod. Sci., 107, 19-28.
43. Meuwissen T.H.E., de Jong G. & Engel B., 1996. Joint estimation of breeding values and heterogeneous variances of large data files. J. Dairy Sci., 79, 310-316.
44. Mulder H.A., 2007. Methods to optimize livestock breeding programs with genotype by environment interaction and genetic heterogeneity of environmental variance. PhD thesis: Wageningen University (The Netherlands).
45. Nauta W.J., Veerkamp R.F., Brascamp E.W. & Bovenhuis H., 2006. Genotype by environment interaction for milk production traits between organic and conventional dairy cattle production in The Netherlands. J. Dairy Sci., 89, 2729-2737.
46. Ojango J.M.K. & Pollot G.E., 2002. The relationship between Holstein bull breeding values for milk yield derived in both the UK and Kenya. Livest. Prod. Sci., 74, 1-12.
47. Oseni S., Misztal I., Tsuruta S. & Rekaya R., 2004. Genetic components of days open under heat stress. J. Dairy Sci., 87, 3022-3028.
48. Ouweltjes W. et al., 2007. Effects of management and genetics on udder health and milk composition in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 90, 229-238.
49. Powell R.L. & Sieber M., 1994. The origin of the world's best sires. Holstein Friesian J., June, 427-440.
50. Pryce J.E., Nielson B.L., Veerkamp R.F. & Simm G., 1999. Genotype and feeding system effects and interactions for health and fertility traits in dairy cattle. Livest. Prod. Sci., 57, 193-201.
51. Raffrenato E. et al., 2003. Genotype by environment interaction for yield and somatic cell score with alternative environmental definitions. J. Dairy Sci., 86, 2470-2479.
52. Ravagnolo O., Misztal I. & Hoogenboom G., 2000. Genetic component of heat stress in dairy cattle, development of heat index function. J. Dairy Sci., 83, 2120-2125.
53. Ravagnolo O. & Misztal I., 2002. Studies on genetics of heat tolerance in dairy cattle with reduced weather information via cluster analysis. J. Dairy Sci., 85, 1586-1589.
54. Rekaya R., Weigel K.A. & Gianola D., 2001. Application of a structural model for genetic covariances in international dairy sire evaluations. J. Dairy Sci., 84, 1525-1530.
55. Rekaya R., Weigel K.A. & Gianola D., 2003. Bayesian estimation of parameters of a structural model for genetic covariances between milk yields in five regions of the United States. J. Dairy Sci., 86, 1837-1844.
56. Ruiz-Sánchez R. et al., 2007. Changes in the association between milk yield and age at first calving in Holstein cows with herd environment level for milk yield. J. Dairy Sci., 90, 4830-4834.
57. Schaeffer L.R., 1994. Multiple-country comparison of dairy sires. J. Dairy Sci., 77, 2671-2678.
58. Stanton T.L., Blake R.W. & Quaas R.L., 1991. Genotype by environment interaction for Holstein milk yield in Colombia, Mexico and Puerto Rico. J. Dairy Sci., 74, 1700-1714.
59. Strandberg E. et al., 2000. Genotype by environment interaction in Nordic dairy cattle studied by use of reaction norms. Interbull Bull., 25, 41-45.
60. Togashi K. et al., 2001a. Partition of sire effects for international sire evaluation in the presence of genotype-environment interaction. Livest. Prod. Sci., 73, 225-235.
61. Togashi K., Lin C.Y. & Moribe K., 2001b. Construction of optimum index to maximize overall performance across countries in the presence of genotype-environment interaction. J. Dairy Sci., 84, 1872-1883.
62. Tollens E., Matty D. & Swennen R., 2004. Agrobiotechnology in developing countries: North-South partnerships are the key. Outlook Agric., 33, 231-238.
63. nd annual meeting of EAAP, September 8-12, 1991, Berlin, Germany, 213-218
64. Veerkamp R.F., Simm G. & Oldham J.D., 1994. Effects of interaction between genotype and feeding system on milk production, feed intake, efficiency and body tissue mobilization in dairy cows. Livest. Prod. Sci., 39, 229-241.
65. Veerkamp R.F., Simm G. & Oldham J.D., 1995. Genotype by environment interaction: experience from Langhill. In: Lawrence T.L., Gordon F.J. & Carson A., eds. Breeding and feeding the high genetic merit dairy cow. Midlothian, Scotland: British Society of Animal Science Occasional Publications, 59-66.
66. Veerkamp R.F. & Goddard M.E., 1998. Covariance functions across herd production levels for test day records on milk, fat, and protein yields. J. Dairy Sci., 81, 1690-1701.
67. Via S. et al., 1995. Adaptive phenotypic plasticity: consensus and controversy. Trends Ecol. Evol., 10, 212-217.
68. Weigel K.A. & Rekaya R., 2000. A multiple-trait herd cluster model for international dairy sire evaluation. J. Dairy Sci., 83, 815-821.
69. Weigel K.A., Rekaya R., Zwald N.R. & Fikse W.F., 2001. International genetic evaluation of dairy sires using a multiple-trait model with individual animal performance records. J. Dairy Sci., 84, 2789-2795.
70. Wiggans G.R. & Van Raden P.M., 1991. Method and effect of adjustment for heterogeneous variance. J. Dairy Sci., 74, 4350-4357.
71. Windig J.J., Calus M.P.L. & Veerkamp M.F., 2005. Influence of herd environment on health and fertility and their relationship with milk production. J. Dairy Sci., 88, 335-347.
72. Woltereck R., 1909. Weiterer experimentelle Untersuchunger uber Artveranderung, Speziell uber das Wessen Quantitativer Artunterschiede bei Daphniden. Dtsch Zool. Ges., 19, 110-172.
73. Zwald N.R., Weigel K.A., Fikse W.F. & Rekaya R., 2003a. Identification of factors that cause genotype by environment interaction between herds of Holstein cattle in seventeen countries. J. Dairy Sci., 86, 1009-1018.
74. Zwald N.R., Weigel K.A., Fikse W.F. & Rekaya R., 2003b. Application of a multiple-trait herd cluster model for genetic evaluation of dairy sires from seventeen countries. J. Dairy Sci., 86, 376-382