Effect of Carbon Dioxide Dry Cleaning on Low-stress Mechanical Properties, Air Permeability and Crease Pressing Performance of Men’s Suit Fabrics

Textile Research Journal

Volumn 79, Issue 13, 2009, Pages 1168-1177

  Rombaldoni, Fabio ^a   Demichelis, Roberto ^a   Mazzuchetti, Giorgio ^a   Ferri, Ada ^b   Banchero, Mauro ^b   Dotti, Francesca ^b  

^a CNR   (Italy)

^b POLITECNICO DI TORINO   (Italy)

Author keywords

air permeability; CO2 cleaning; crease angle; low stress mechanical properties

Indexed keywords

AIR CLEANERS; AIR PERMEABILITY; DRY CLEANING; WOOL; YARN;

CLEANING PROCESS; COMPRESSIONAL; CREASE ANGLE; EFFECT OF CARBONS; LOW STRESS MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; PERCHLOROETHYLENE; PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

BENDING; CARBON DIOXIDE; CASHMERE FABRIC; CREASE RESISTANCE; DRYCLEANING; MECHANICAL PROPERTY; PERMEABILITY; PHYSICAL PROPERTY; PRESSING; SUIT; TENSILE PROPERTY; WOOL FABRIC;

EID: 70349196859     PISSN: 00405175     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0040517509102397     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bach, E., Cleve, E., and Schollmeyer, E., Past, Present and Future of Supercritical Fluid Dyeing Technology - an Overview, Rev. Prog. Color. Relat. Topics 32, 88-102 (2002).
2. McClain, J.B., Betts, D.E., Canelas, D.A., Samulski, E.T., DeSimone, J.M., Londono, J.D., Cochran, H.D., Wignall, G.D., Chillura-Martino, D., and Triolo, R., Design of Nonionic Surfactants for Supercritical Carbon Dioxide, Science 274(5295), 2049-2052 (1996).
3. Bowman, L.E., Reade, N.H., Hallen, R.T., and Butenhoff, A., Advances in Carbon Dioxide Based Sizing and Desizing, Textile Res. J. 68(10), 732-738 (1998).
4. Washpoint - the Objective Resource for Drycleaning Professionals, Available at http://www.washpoint.com.
5. van Roosmalen, M.J.E., Woerlee, G.F., and Witkamp, G.J., Amino Acid Based Surfactants for Dry-cleaning with Highpressure Carbon Dioxide, J. Supercrit. Fluids 32(1-3), 243-254 (2004).
6. Mahar, T.J., Dhingra, R.C., and Postle, R., Measuring and Interpreting Low-stress Fabric Mechanical and Surface Properties - Part I: Precision of Measurement, Textile Res. J. 57(6), 357-369 (1987).
7. Kawabata, S., “The Standardization and Analysis of Hand Evaluation,” 2nd Edn., The Textile Machinery Society of Japan, Osaka, Japan (1980).
8. Kawabata, S., and Niwa, M., Fabric Performance in Clothing and Clothing Manufacture, J. Textile Inst. 80, 19-50 (1989).
9. Ly, N.G., and Denby, E.F., “A CSIRO Interlaboratory Trial of the KES-F System for Measuring Fabric Properties,” CSIRO Division of Textile Physics, Ryde, Australia (1986).
10. Ly, N.G., The Pressing Performance of Fabrics, In “Finishing and Wool Fabric Properties,” Brady, P. R., (Ed.), CSIRO Wool Technology, Victoria, Australia (1997).
11. Kan, C.W., and Yuen, C.W.M., Effect of Low Temperature Plasma Treatment on Wool Fabric Properties, Fibers Polym. 6(2), 169-173 (2005).
12. Amihope LL, Available at http://www.ajinomoto.co.jp/amino/e_aminoscience/cosmetics/functional.html.
13. Jeong, Y.J., Cha, S.Y., Yu, W.R., and Park, W.H., Changes in the Mechanical Properties of Chitosan-treated Wool Fabric, Textile Res. J. 72(1), 70-76 (2002).
14. Dhingra, R.C., Liu, D., and Postle, R., Measuring and Interpreting Low-stress Fabric Mechanical and Surface Properties - Part II: Application to Finishing, Drycleaning, and Photodegradation of Wool Fabrics, Textile Res. J. 59(6), 357-368 (1989).
15. Sirolan Press Test - Instruction Manual, CSIRO Division of Wool Technology, Ryde, Australia (1996).
16. Shi, F.J., Hu, J., and Yu, T., Modeling the Creasing Properties of Woven Fabrics, Textile Res. J. 70(3), 247-255 (2000).