Health care reform requires law reform

Health Affairs

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2009, Pages

  Jost, Timothy S ^a  

^a WASHINGTON AND LEE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE FINANCING; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; LAW; UNITED STATES;

EMPLOYEE INCENTIVE PLANS; FEDERAL GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE REFORM; STATE GOVERNMENT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 70349193173     PISSN: 02782715     EISSN: 15445208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.5.w761     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Cimasi RJ. The U.S. healthcare certificate of need sourcebook. Washington (DC): Beard Books; 2005.
2. U.S. v. South-Eastern Underwriters Ass'n, 322 U.S. 533 (1944).
3. Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar, 421 U.S. 773 (1975).
4. United States Constitution, Art. 1, sec. 8
5. 42U.S.Code, sec. 1395dd.
6. 42U.S.Code, sec. 1320a-7b(b).
7. 42 U.S. Code, sec. 1395nn.
8. Retail Industry Leaders Ass'n v. Fielder, 475 F.3d 180 (4th Cir. 2007) (finding ERISA preemption of Maryland play-or-pay law).
9. Golden Gate Restaurant Ass'n v. City and County of San Francisco, 546 F.3d. 639 (9th Cir. 2008) (finding no preemption of San Francisco law).
10. Jacobson PD. The role of ERISA preemption in health reform: opportunities and limits. Washington (DC): O'Neill Institute, Georgetown University; 2009.
11. FMC Corporation v. Holliday, 498 U.S. 52 (1990).
12. Aetna Health Inc. v. Davila, 542 U.S. 200 (2004).
13. Gosfield AG. Medicare and Medicaid fraud and abuse. 2008 ed. Eagan (MN): Thompson/West; 2008.
14. 42 U.S. Code, sec. 1320d-7.
15. N.J.S.A. 52:17B-196 (expired 2008).
16. California Retail Liquor Dealers Ass'n v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc. 445 U.S. 97 (1980).
17. 42 U.S. Code, secs. 300gg-22(a)(2), 300gg-44(b)(3).
18. Monahan AB. Pay or play laws, ERISA preemption, and potential lessons from Massachusetts. U Kan L Rev 2007;55:1203-1232
19. Weeks EA. Failure to connect: the Massachusetts plan for individual health insurance. U Kan L Rev 2007;55:1283-1312.
20. Summit Health Ltd. v. Pinhas, 500 U.S. 322 (1991).
21. Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. 1 (2005).
22. Printz v. United States, 521 U.S. 898 (1997).
23. New York v. United States, 505 U.S. 144 (1992).
24. 15 U.S. Code, secs. 1011, 1012.
25. Barnett Bank of Marion County, N.A. v. Nelson, 517 U.S. 25 (1995).
26. 42 U.S. Code, sec. 1395w-26(b)(3).
27. 29 U.S. Code, sec. 1144.
28. New York State Conference of Blue Cross and Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers Ins. Co., 514 U.S. 645 (1995).
29. Jost TS, Emanuel EJ. Legal reforms necessary to promote delivery system innovation. JAMA. 2008;299(21):2561-2563
30. 42 U.S. Code, secs. 1395nn(b)(2), (e)(2), (e)(3).
31. 42 C.F.R., secs. 1001.952(d) and (i).
32. Casalino LP. The Federal Trade Commission, clinical integration, and the organization of medical practice. J. Health Polit Polic. 2006;31(3):569-585
33. Hammer PJ, Sage WM. Critical issues in hospital antitrust law. Health Aff (Millwood). 2003;22(6):88-100.
34. 45 C.F.R., sec. 164.506(c)(5).
35. Testimony of Lewis Morris, Chief Counsel to Inspector General, 109th Cong., 1st Sess. (Oct. 7, 2005). [cited 2008 July 5]. Available from: http://www.oig.hhs.gov/testimony/docs/2005/Gainsharing10-07-05.pdf
36. Dobbins DC. Survey of state laws relating to the corporate practice of medicine. Health Lawyer. 1997;5:18-23.
37. Congressional Budget Office. Key issues in analyzing major health insurance proposals. Washington (DC): CBO; 2008.
38. Blumstein, JF. Medical malpractice standard-setting: developing malpractice "safe harbors" as a new role from the QIOs? Vand L Rev 2006;59:1017-1049
39. See Kaiser Family Foundation Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured. Deficit Reduction Act of 2005: implications for Medicaid. Washington (DC): Kaiser Commission; 2006.
40. Wicks EK. Hall MA. Purchasing cooperatives for small employers: performance and prospects. Milbank Q. 2000;78(4):511-546
41. Georgetown University. Legal solutions in health reform [Internet]. Washington (DC): O'Neill Institute; 2009 [cited 2009 May 20]. Available from: http://www.law.georgetown.edu/oneillinstitute/projects/reform
42. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Health reform, legal issues [Internet]. Princeton (NJ): Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. c2008 [cited 2009 May 20]. Available from: http://www.rwjf.org/healthreform/coverage/overcomingbarriers/ legal.jsp