Information technology, privacy, and the protection of personal data

Information Technology and Moral Philosophy

Volumn 9780521855495, Issue , 2008, Pages 301-321

  van den Hoven, Jeroen ^a,b  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349157753     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511498725.016     Document Type: Chapter

References (43)

1. Aarts, E., and Encarnacao, J. L. (Eds.). 2006. True Visions. The Emergence of Ambient Intelligence. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
2. Bach, K. 1987. Thought and Reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Benn, S. 1988. A Theory of Freedom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 277, 288 (resp).
4. Berlin, I. 1969. Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 156, n. 1.
5. Caplan, J., and Torpey, J. C. (Eds.). 2001. Documenting Individual Identity: The Development of State Practices in the Modern World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
6. Castaneda, H.-N. 1989. Thinking, Language and Experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
7. De Jasay, A. 1989. Social Contract, Free Ride: A Study of the Public Goods. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
8. Donellan, K. 1966. Reference and definite descriptions. Philosophical Review, 75, 281–304
9. Etzioni, A. 1996. Less privacy is good for us. The Responsive Community, Summer, 11–13. Available at www.gwu.edu/∼ccps/etzioni/M28.pdf.
10. Etzioni, A. 2005. Limits of privacy, in A. I. Cohen and C. H. Wellman (Eds.), Contemporary Debates in Applied Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 253–262.
11. European Parliament. 1995. Directive 95/46/EC on The protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and the free movement of such data, adopted October 24 1195, Official Journal, 281, pp. 31–50, Brussels.
12. Garver, N. 1990. Why pluralism now? Monist, 7, 388–410.
13. Gavison, R. 1980. Privacy and the limits of law. Yale Law Journal, 89, 421–471.
14. Reprinted in Schoeman, F. (Ed.). 1984. Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 346–402.
15. Monteiro, N. P. 2004. No privacy, no poetry, no progress. Department of Political Science, University of Chicago, Political Theory Workshop, 18 October 2004. Available at www.pwt.uchicago.edu/monteiro002.pdf.
16. Moor, J. H. 2006. The nature, importance, and difficulty of machine ethics. Machine Ethics, 21, 4, 18–21.
17. Moore, B. 1984. Privacy: Studies in Social and Cultural History. New York: M. E. Sharpe.
18. Moran, R. 2001. Authority and Estrangement. An Essay on Self-Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
19. Nagel, T. 1998. Concealment and exposure. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 27, 1, 3–30.
20. Nissenbaum, H. 2004. Privacy as contextual integrity. Washington Law Review, 79, 1, 119–158.
21. Ortiz Hill, C. 1997. Rethinking Identity and Metaphysics, On the Foundations of Analytic Philosophy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
22. Perry, J. 2002. Identity, Personal Identity and the Self. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, p. 195.
23. Perry, T. D. 1986. Professional Philosophy. What it is and Why it Matters. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
24. Quittner, J. 1997. The death of privacy. Time, 25 August, p. 18.
25. Roessler, B. 2005. The Value of Privacy. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
26. Russell, B. 1978. The Problems of Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27. Safire, W. 2005. Goodbye to Privacy. New York Times, April 10.
28. Sandel, M. J. 1989. Moral argument and liberal toleration: Abortion and homosexuality. California Law Review, 77, 521–538.
29. Schoeman, F. (Ed.). 1984. Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 346–402.
30. Solove, D. J. 2002. Conceptualizing privacy. California Law Review, 90, 4, 1087–1155.
31. Spinello, R. 1997. End of privacy. America, 176, January 4-11, 9-13.
32. van den Hoven, M. J. 1999. Privacy and the varieties of informational wrongdoing. Australian Journal of Professional and Applied Ethics, 1, 1, 30–44.
33. van den Hoven, M. J. 2006. Nanotechnology and privacy: the instructive case of RFID. International Journal of Applied Philosophy, 20, 2.
34. van den Hoven, J., and Cushman, R. 1996. Privacy, Health Care Data and Information Technology, Conference Report. Journal of Information, Law, and Technology (JILT), 3. Available at http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/elj/jilt/1996 3/hoven/
35. van den Hoven, M. J., and Manders, M. 2006. Identiteitsmanagement en morele identificatie’ (Identity management and moral identification). ANTW, 98, 2, 111–128.
36. Velleman, J. D. 1996. Self to self. Philosophical Review, 105, 1, 39–76.
37. Velleman, J. D. 2001. The genesis of shame. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 30, 27–52.
38. Wagner DeCew, J. 1997. In Pursuit of Privacy: Law, Ethics, and the Limits of Technology.Ithaca and London: Cornell Press.
39. Walzer, M. 1983. Spheres of Justice. Oxford: Blackwell.
40. Walzer, M. 1995. Critique of liberalism, in Amitai Etzioni (Ed.), New Communitarian Thinking. Richmond: University Press of Virginia, p. 63.
41. Warren, S., and Brandeis L. D. 1890. The right to privacy. Harvard Law Review, 4, 193–220.
42. Wiegel, V., van den Hoven, M. J., and Lokhorst, G. J. C. 2005. Privacy, deontic epistemic action logic and software agents: An executable approach to modeling moral constraints in complex informational relationships. Ethics and Information Technology, 7, 4, 251–264.
43. Williams, B. 1973. Problems of the Self. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.