-
1
-
-
33748881378
-
IMOP: Randomised placebo controlled trial of outpatient cervical ripening with isosorbide mononitrate (IMN) prior to induction of labour - Clinical trial with analyses of efficacy, cost effectiveness and acceptability
-
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-6-25
-
Bollapragada S, Mackenzie F, Norrie J, Petrou S, Reid M, Greer I, et al.IMOP: randomised placebo controlled trial of outpatient cervical ripening with isosorbide mononitrate (IMN) prior to induction of labour - clinical trial with analyses of efficacy, cost effectiveness and acceptability. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2006;6:25. [: ISRCTN39772441] (Pubitemid 44419719)
-
(2006)
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
, vol.6
, pp. 25
-
-
Bollapragada, S.1
Mackenzie, F.2
Norrie, J.3
Petrou, S.4
Reid, M.5
Greer, I.6
Osman, I.7
Norman, J.E.8
-
3
-
-
0026698086
-
Intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel. Safety for outpatient cervical ripening before induction of labor
-
Elliott JP, Clewell WH, Radin TG. Intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel. Safety for outpatient cervical ripening before induction of labor. Journal of Reproductive Medicine 1992;37(8):713-716
-
(1992)
Journal of Reproductive Medicine
, vol.37
, Issue.8
, pp. 713-716
-
-
Elliott, J.P.1
Clewell, W.H.2
Radin, T.G.3
-
5
-
-
0041322698
-
Labor induction rate variation in upstate New York: What is the difference?
-
Glantz JC. Labor induction rate variation in upstate New York: what is the difference?. Birth 2003;30(3):168-174
-
(2003)
Birth
, vol.30
, Issue.3
, pp. 168-174
-
-
Glantz, J.C.1
-
7
-
-
70049112482
-
Methods for cervical ripening and labour induction in late pregnancy: Generic protocol
-
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002074
-
Hofmeyr GJ, Alfirevic Z, Kelly T, Kavanagh J, Thomas J, Brocklehurst P, et al. Methods for cervical ripening and labour induction in late pregnancy: generic protocol. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2000, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002074]
-
(2000)
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
, Issue.2
-
-
Hofmeyr, G.J.1
Alfirevic, Z.2
Kelly, T.3
Kavanagh, J.4
Thomas, J.5
Brocklehurst, P.6
-
8
-
-
33746809664
-
Induction of labour in specific clinical situations: Generic protocol
-
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003398
-
Kelly A, Alfirevic Z, Hofmeyr GJ, Kavanagh J, Neilson JP, Thomas J. Induction of labour in specific clinical situations: generic protocol. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2001, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003398]
-
(2001)
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
, Issue.4
-
-
Kelly, A.1
Alfirevic, Z.2
Hofmeyr, G.J.3
Kavanagh, J.4
Neilson, J.P.5
Thomas, J.6
-
9
-
-
55049104253
-
Outpatient versus in-patient induction of labour for improving birth outcomes
-
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007372
-
Kelly A, Alfirevic Z, Dowswell T. Outpatient versus in-patient induction of labour for improving birth outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007372]
-
(2008)
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
, Issue.4
-
-
Kelly, A.1
Alfirevic, Z.2
Dowswell, T.3
-
10
-
-
2542444285
-
Trends in labor induction in the United States: Is it true that what goes up must come down?
-
Kirby RS. Trends in labor induction in the United States: is it true that what goes up must come down?. Birth 2004;31(2):148-151
-
(2004)
Birth
, vol.31
, Issue.2
, pp. 148-151
-
-
Kirby, R.S.1
-
11
-
-
33947178092
-
Mifepristone and misoprostol in the induction of labor at term
-
DOI 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.09.030, PII S0020729206004930
-
McGill J, Shetty A.Mifepristone andmisoprostol in the induction of labor at term. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 2007; 96(2):80-84 (Pubitemid 46399615)
-
(2007)
International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
, vol.96
, Issue.2
, pp. 80-84
-
-
McGill, J.1
Shetty, A.2
-
12
-
-
0036863598
-
Outpatient cervical ripening prior to induction of labour
-
DOI 10.1080/0144361021000020411
-
Neale E, Pachulski A, Whiterod S, McGuinness E, Gallagher N, Wallace R. Outpatient cervical ripening prior to induction of labour. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2002;22(6):634-635 (Pubitemid 35448804)
-
(2002)
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
, vol.22
, Issue.6
, pp. 634-635
-
-
Neale, E.1
Pachulski, A.2
Whiterod, S.3
McGuinness, E.4
Gallagher, N.5
Wallace, R.6
-
14
-
-
0036298871
-
Rising rates of labor induction: Present concerns and future strategies
-
DOI 10.1016/S0029-7844(02)02047-1, PII S0029784402020471
-
Rayburn WF, Zhang J. Rising rates of labor induction: present concerns and future strategies. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2002;100(1): 164-167 (Pubitemid 34722857)
-
(2002)
Obstetrics and Gynecology
, vol.100
, Issue.1
, pp. 164-167
-
-
Rayburn, W.F.1
Zhang, J.2
-
15
-
-
69549099882
-
-
The Cochrane Collaboration. Copenhagen, The Nordic Cochrane Centre: The Cochrane Collaboration
-
The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). 5.0. Copenhagen, The Nordic Cochrane Centre: The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008.
-
(2008)
Review Manager (RevMan). 5.0
-
-
-
17
-
-
27644449312
-
Women's perceptions, expectations and satisfaction with induced labour--a questionnaire-based study
-
Shetty A, Burt R, Rice P, Templeton A. Women's perceptions, expectations and satisfaction with induced labour--a questionnaire-based study. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2005;123(1):56-61.
-
(2005)
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
, vol.123
, Issue.1
, pp. 56-61
-
-
Shetty, A.1
Burt, R.2
Rice, P.3
Templeton, A.4
|