Interface design strategies for computer-assisted speech transcription

Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Designing for Habitus and Habitat, OZCHI'08

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 203-210

  Luz, Saturnino ^a   Masoodian, Masood ^b   Rogers, Bill ^b   Deering, Chris ^a  

^a TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Automatic speech recognition; Computer assisted speech transcription; Error correction

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATIC SPEECH RECOGNITION; COMPUTER ASSISTED; COMPUTER-ASSISTED SPEECH TRANSCRIPTION; DYNAMIC PROPAGATION; FEEDBACK PROPAGATION; INTERFACE DESIGNS; LEXICAL CONTEXTS; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; SPEECH RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGY; SPEECH TRANSCRIPTIONS; TASK PERFORMANCE; USER FEEDBACK; USER INTERFACE DESIGNS;

AUDIO SYSTEMS; CRACK PROPAGATION; ECOLOGY; ERROR CORRECTION; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; OCEAN HABITATS; SPEECH TRANSMISSION; TRANSCRIPTION; USER INTERFACES;

SPEECH RECOGNITION;

EID: 70349141661     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1517744.1517812     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. W. A. Ainsworth and S. R. Pratt. Feedback strategies for error correction in speech recognition systems. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 36(6):833-842, June 1992.
2. A. Artegian. The technology-augmented court record. In Proceedings of the Fifth National Court Technology Conference, 1997.
3. Audacity sound editor.http://audacity.sf.net/. accessed 2nd July 2008.
4. C. Barras, E. Geoffrois, Z. Wu, and M. Liberman. Transcriber: development and use of a tool for assisting speech corpora production. Speech Communication, 33(1-2):5-22, 2001.
5. S. Borowitz. Computer-based speech recognition as an alternative to medical transcription. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 8:101-102, 2001.
6. M.-M. Bouamrane and S. Luz. An analytical evaluation of search by content and interaction patterns on multimodal meeting records. Multimedia Systems, 13(2):89-102, 2007.
7. J. Foote. An overview of audio information retrieval. Multimedia Systems, 7(1):2-10, 1999.
8. Halverson, C. A., Horn, D. B., Karat, C.-M., and J. Karat. The beauty of errors: Patterns of error correction in desktop speech systems. In Proceedings of INTERACT'99: Human-Computer Interaction, pages 133-140, 1999.
9. T. Hazen. Automatic alignment and error correction of human generated transcripts for long speech recordings. In Procedings of Inter speech'06, pages 1606-1609, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 2006.
10. K. S. Hone and C. Baber. Modelling the effects of constraint upon speech-based human-computer interaction. Interface Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 50(1):85-107, 1999.
11. P. Liu and F. K. Soong. Word graph based speech recognition error correction by handwriting input. In ICMI '06: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Multimodal interfaces, pages 339-346, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM Press.
12. S. Luz, M. Masoodian, and B. Rogers. Interactive visualisation techniques for dynamic speech transcription, correction and training. In Procs. of the 9th ACM SICHI-NZ annual Conf. on Computer-Human Interaction, pages 9-16. ACM Press, 2008.
13. I. McCowan, D. Moore, J. Dines, D. Gatica-Perez, M. Flynn, P. Wellner, and H. Bourlard. On the use of information retrieval measures for speech recognition evaluation. Technical Report IDIAP-RR-04-73, LIDIAP, 2004.
14. D. N. Mohr, D. W. Turner, G. R. Pond, J. S. Kamath, C. B. De Vos, and P. C. Carpenter. Speech recognition as a transcription aid: A randomized comparison with standard transcription. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 10(1):85-93, 2003.
15. MPI. ELAN: Eucido Linguistic Annotator. Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, March 2005. http://www.mpi.nl/tools/elan.html.
16. C. Munteanu, R. Baecker, and G. Penn. Collaborative editing for improved usefulness and usability of transcript-enhanced webcasts. In CHI '08: Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 373-382. ACM Press, 2008.
17. H. Nanjo and T. Kawahara. Towards an efficient archive of spontaneous speech: Design of computer-assisted speech transcription system. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120:3042, 2006.
18. D. D. Palmer, M. Ostendorf, and J. D. Burger. Robust information extraction from automatically generated speech transcriptions. Speech Communication, 32(1-2):95-109, 2000.
19. D. Rosenthal, F. Chew, D. Dupuy, S. Kattapuram, W. Palmer, R. Yap, and L. Levine. Computer-based speech recognition as a replacement for medical transcription. American Journal of Roentgenology, 170(1):23-5, 1998.
20. K. Sjölander and J. Beskow. Wavesurfer - an open source speech tool. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. ISCA, 2000.
21. B. Suhm, B. Myers, and A. Waibel. Multimodal error correction for speech user interfaces. ACM Trans. Comput. - Hum. Interact., 8(1):60-98, 2001.
22. C. L. Wayne. Topic detection and tracking (TDT): Overview and perspectives. In Proceedings of the DARPA Broadcast News Transcription and Understanding Workshop, Lansdowne Conference Resort Lansdowne, Virginia, USA, Feb. 1998.
23. A. Zafar, B. Mamlin, S. Perkins, A. M. Belsito, J. M. Overhage, and C. J. McDonald. A simple error classification system for understanding sources of error in automatic speech recognition and human transcription. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 73:719-730, Sep 2004.