Sharing and showing: Television as monstration

Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science

Volumn 625, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 19-31

  Dayan, Daniel ^a  

^a Institut Marcel Mauss   (France)

Author keywords

Attention; Center; Monstration; Periphery; Sharedness; Television

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349130285     PISSN: 00027162     EISSN: 15523349     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0002716209338364     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Appadurai, Arjun. 1996. Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
2. Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The human condition. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
3. Austin, J.L. 1962. How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4. Belting, Hans. 2004. Medium, Image corps, & le lieu des images. in Pour une anthropologie des images. (Paris: Gallimard)
5. Boltanski, Luc. 1999. The question of the spectator, 3-55; and The topics of suffering, 57-131. In Distant sufferings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Darnton, Robert. 2007. The art and politics of libel in 18th century France. Lecture, Harvard University, November 1, Cambridge, MA.
7. Dayan, Daniel. 2006. Quand voir c'est faire. In Daniel Dayan, La terreur-spectacle. Terrorisme et Télévision. Paris: INA-de boek.
8. Dayan, Daniel. 2008. Beyond media events (postface). In Monroe Price and Daniel Dayan, Owning the Olympics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
9. Dayan, Daniel, and Elihu Katz. 1992. Media events, the live broadcasting of history. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10. Deleuze, Gilles, and Felix Guattari. 1972. l'anti-oedipe. Capitalisme et Schizophrenie. Paris: Minuit.
11. Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of self in everyday life. N Y: Anchor Books. Reprint, London: Penguin. 1990
12. Goldfarb, Jeff. 2006. The politics of small things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13. Gourevitch, Philip, and Errol Morris. 2008. Annals of war: Exposure-The woman behind the camera at Abu Ghraib. The New Yorker, March 21.
14. Huber, G. 2003. Contr'expertise d'une mise en scéne. Paris: Raphael.
15. Katz, Elihu. 1993. L'heritage de Gabriel Tarde. In Hermès, 11-12. Paris: Presses du CNRS.
16. Katz, Elihu. 2006. Rediscovering Gabriel Tarde. Political Communication 23:403.
17. Latour, Bruno. 2002. Gabriel Tarde and the end of the social. In The social in question. New bearings in history and the social sciences, ed. Patrick Joyce, 17-132. London: Routledge.
18. Lemieux, Cyril. 2007. A quoi sert l'analyse des controverses? Mille neuf cent, Revued'histoire Intellectuelle, 25.
19. Lokeilani, K. 2008. American evil. Graduate seminar paper, Department of Politics, New School for Social Research, New York.
20. Merton, Robert K. 1995. The Thomas theorem and the Matthew effect. Social Forces 74 (2): 379-424.
21. Petition on behalf of France II. 2008. Paid ad, sponsored by Le Nouvel Observateur, Marianne. Le Monde, June 8-9.
22. Ravel, Jeff S. 1999. The contested parterre, public theater and French political culture. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
23. Rosental, Claude. 2007. Demo-cracy in Europe. Démonstration et sociologie des sciences. CEMS-EHESS seminar, Paris.
24. Scannell, Paddy. 2000. For anyone as someone structures. Media Culture and Society 22:5-24.
25. Semprini, Andrea. 2003. La société de flux. Formes du sens et identité dans les sociétés contemporaines. Paris: L'Harmattan, and Habilitation Thesis, I E P University of Lyon III.
26. Shapira, E. 2002. Das Rote Quadrat. Drei kugeln und ein totes kind. Documentary film. ARD, March 18.
27. Silverstone, Roger. 2006. Media and morality. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
28. Thomas, W.I., and Thomas, D.S. 1928. The Child in America, Behaviours, Problems and Programs. P. 571. NY: Knopf.
29. Wentland, A. 2008. Digital media, morality and the Himalaya. Graduate seminar paper, Department of Politics, New School of Social Research, New York.