Television, public participation, and public service: From value consensus to the politics of identity

Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science

Volumn 625, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 128-138

  Lunt, Peter ^a  

^a BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Popular television; Public participation; Public service broadcasting

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349129455     PISSN: 00027162     EISSN: 15523349     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0002716209338457     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Andrejevic, M. 2004. Reality TV: The work of being watched. Oxford, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.
2. Arvidsson, A. 2006. Brands: Meaning and value in media culture. London: Routledge.
3. Benhabib, S. 1996. Toward a deliberative model of democratic legitimacy. In Democracy and difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political, ed. S. Benhabib, 67-94. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4. Blumler, J.G. 1991. Television and the public interest: Vulnerable values in Western European broadcasting. London: Sage.
5. Bohman, J. 2000. Public deliberation: Pluralism, complexity, and democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Bondebjerg, I. 2002. The mediation of everydaylife: Genre, discourse and spectacle in reality TV. In Realism and reality in film and media, ed. A. Jerslev, 159-92. Copenhagen, Denmark: Museum Tusculanum Press.
7. Born, G. 2003. Strategy, positioning and projection in digital television: Channel Four and the commercialization of public service broadcasting in the UK. Media, Culture & Society 25: 774-99.
8. Brunsdon, C. 2003. Lifestyling Britain: The 8-9 slot on British television. International Journal of Cultural Studies 6 (1): 5-23.
9. Corner, J. 1991. Meaning, genre and context: The problematics of public knowledge in the new audience studies. In Mass media and society, ed. J. Curran and M. Gurevitch, 267-84. London: Edward Arnold.
10. Dean, M. 1999. Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Giddens, A. 1991. Modernity and self identity. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
12. Habermas, J. 1996. Between facts and norms. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
13. Hartley, J. 2008. Television truths. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
14. Held, D. 2006. Models of democracy. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
15. Hill, A. 2005. Reality TV: Audiences and popular factual television. London: Routledge.
16. Honneth, A. 1995. The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Illouz, E. 2003. Oprah Winfrey and the glamour of misery: An essay on popular culture. New York: Columbia University Press.
18. Livingstone, S. 1998. Making sense of television: The psychology of audience interpretation. London: Routledge.
19. Livingstone, S., and P. Lunt. 1994. Talk on television: Audience participation and public debate. London: Routledge.
20. Lunt, P. 2008. Little Angels: The mediation of parenting. Continuum 22 (4): 537-46.
21. Lunt, P., and T. Lewis. 2008. OPRAH.com: Lifestyle expertise and the politics of recognition. Women and Performance: A Journal of Feminist Theory 18 (1): 9-24.
22. Ouellette, L., and J. Hay. 2008. Better living through reality TV: Television and post-welfare citizenship. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
23. Taylor, L. 2002. From ways of life to lifestyle: The ordinari-ization of British gardening lifestyle television. European Journal of Communication 17 (4): 479-93.
24. Thompson, S. 2006. The political theory of recognition: A critical introduction. Cambridge, UK: Polity.