Informed participation in a randomised controlled trial of computed tomography screening for lung cancer

European Respiratory Journal

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 711-720

  Van Den Bergh, K A M ^a   Essink Bot, M L ^a,b   Van Klaveren, R J ^a   De Koning, H J ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Informed decision making; Knowledge; Lung neoplasms; Mass screening; Participation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BELGIUM; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; LUNG CANCER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NETHERLANDS; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SMOKING;

AGED; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; LOGISTIC MODELS; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 70349127212     PISSN: 09031936     EISSN: 13993003     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00098908     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Ferlay J, Bray F, Pisani P, et al., GLOBOCAN 2002: Cancer Incidence, Mortality and Prevalence Worldwide. IARC CancerBase No. 5. version 2.0., vol 2005. Lyon, IARCPress, 2004.
2. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2007. Atlanta, American Cancer Society, 2007. www.cancer.org/downloads/STT/CAFF2007PWSecured. pdf Date last accessed: June 26, 2008.
3. Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Libby DM, et al. Survival of patients with stage I lung cancer detected on CT screening. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 1763-1771. (Pubitemid 44631359)
4. Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Fowler FJ Jr, et al. Enthusiasm for cancer screening in the United States. JAMA 2004; 291: 71-78. (Pubitemid 38040537)
5. Bach PB, Jett JR, Pastorino U, et al. Computed tomography screening and lung cancer outcomes. JAMA 2007; 297: 953-961. (Pubitemid 46376749)
6. Gohagan J, Marcus P, Fagerstrom R, et al. Baseline findings of a randomized feasibility trial of lung cancer screening with spiral CT scan vs chest radiograph: the Lung Screening Study of the National Cancer Institute. Chest 2004; 126: 114-121. (Pubitemid 38943126)
7. van Iersel CA, de Koning HJ, Draisma G, et al. Risk-based selection from the general population in a screening trial: selection criteria, recruitment and power for the Dutch-Belgian randomised lung cancer multi-slice CT screening trial (NELSON). Int J Cancer 2007; 120: 868-874. (Pubitemid 46175408)
8. Marteau TM, Dormandy E, Michie S. A measure of informed choice. Health Expect 2001; 4: 99-108.
9. Michie S, Dormandy E, Marteau TM. The multi-dimensional measure of informed choice: a validation study. Patient Educ Couns 2002; 48: 87-91. (Pubitemid 36151685)
10. Irwig L, McCaffery K, Salkeld G, et al. Informed choice for screening: implications for evaluation. BMJ 2006; 332: 1148-1150. (Pubitemid 44480884)
11. van den Berg M, Timmermans DR, Ten Kate LP, et al. Are pregnant women making informed choices about prenatal screening? Genet Med 2005; 7: 332-338.
12. Wald N. Information leaflets in medical screening. J Med Screen 2006; 13: 109.
13. Jepson RG, Hewison J, Thompson AG, et al. How should we measure informed choice? The case of cancer screening. J Med Ethics 2005; 31: 192-196. (Pubitemid 40542127)
14. Hewitson P, Austoker J. Part 2: Patient information, informed decision-making and the psycho-social impact of prostate-specific antigen testing. BJU Int 2005; 95: Suppl. 3, 16-32. (Pubitemid 40547264)
15. Philips Z, Avis M, Whynes DK. Knowledge of cervical cancer and screening among women in east-central England. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2005; 15: 639-645. (Pubitemid 41022902)
16. General Medical Council. Seeking patients' consent: the ethical considerations. London, General Medical Council, 1998. www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/ archive/Seeking%20patients%20consent%20The%20ethical%20considerations.pdf. Date last accessed: June 26, 2008.
17. Nijs HG, Essink-Bot ML, DeKoning HJ, et al. Why do men refuse or attend population-based screening for prostate cancer? J Public Health Med 2000; 22: 312-316.
18. Fylan F. Screening for cervical cancer: a review of women's attitudes, knowledge, and behaviour. Br J Gen Pract 1998; 48: 1509-1514. (Pubitemid 28393781)
19. Idestrom M, Milsom I, Andersson-Ellstrom A. Knowledge and attitudes about the Pap-smear screening program: a population-based study of women aged 20-59 years. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2002; 81: 962-967. (Pubitemid 35176989)
20. Watson E, Hewitson P, Brett J, et al. Informed decision making and prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing for prostate cancer: A randomised controlled trial exploring the impact of a brief patient decision aid on men's knowledge, attitudes and intention to be tested. Patient Educ Couns 2006; 63: 367-379. (Pubitemid 44511880)
21. Briss P, Rimer B, Reilley B, et al. Promoting informed decisions about cancer screening in communities and healthcare systems. Am J Prev Med 2004; 26: 67-80. (Pubitemid 38045176)
22. Livingston P, Wakefield M, Elwood JM. Community attitudes towards the early detection of cancer in Victoria, Australia. Aust NZ J Public Health 2007; 31: 26-29. (Pubitemid 46380630)
23. Hahn EJ, Rayens MK, Hopenhayn C, et al. Perceived risk and interest in screening for lung cancer among current and former smokers. Res Nurs Health 2006; 29: 359-370. (Pubitemid 44763232)
24. Schnoll RA, Bradley P, Miller SM, et al. Psychological issues related to the use of spiral CT for lung cancer early detection. Lung Cancer 2003; 39: 315-325. (Pubitemid 36279451)
25. Blomberg K, Ternestedt BM, Törnberg S, et al., How do women who choose not to participate in population-based cervical cancer screening reason about their decision? Psychooncology 2008; 17: 561-569.
26. Eborall HC, Griffin SJ, Prevost AT, et al. Psychological impact of screening for type 2 diabetes: controlled trial and comparative study embedded in the ADDITION (Cambridge) randomised controlled trial. Br Med J 2007; 335: 486.
27. Dormandy E, Hooper R, Michie S, et al. Informed choice to undergo prenatal screening: a comparison of two hospitals conducting testing either as part of a routine visit or requiring a separate visit. J Med Screen 2002; 9: 109-114. (Pubitemid 35205232)
28. Rimer BK, Briss PA, Zeller PK, et al. Informed decision making: what is its role in cancer screening? Cancer 2004; 101: Suppl., 1214-1228.
29. National Cancer Institute (NCI). Designing print materials: A communications guide for breast cancer screening. NIH Publication No. 07-6100. Bethesda, National Institutes of Health, 2007. http://appliedresearch.cancer. gov/icsn/manual.pdf.
30. Entwistle VA, Carter SM, Trevena L, et al. Communicating about screening. Br Med J 2008; 337: a1591.
31. Green JM, Hewison J, Bekker HL, et al. Psychosocial aspects of genetic screening of pregnant women and newborns: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess 2004; 8: 1-109. (Pubitemid 39214525)