Transformational government: Basics and key issues tutorial and workshop

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn 351, Issue , 2008, Pages 117-122

  Janssen, Marijn ^a   Shu, William S ^b  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BUEA   (Cameroon)

Author keywords

Business process reengineering; Enterprise architecture; Redesign; Transformational government

Indexed keywords

BUSINESS PROCESS REENGINEERING; CURRENT STRUCTURE; E-GOVERNANCE; E-GOVERNMENT; E-GOVERNMENTS; ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE; KEY ISSUES; LOW COSTS; POVERTY REDUCTION; PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION; REDESIGN; REFERENCE MODELS; SERVICE PROVISIONING; TRANSFORMATIONAL GOVERNMENT;

GOVERNMENT DATA PROCESSING; TAXATION;

REENGINEERING;

EID: 70349120901     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1509096.1509120     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. P. Beynon-Davies and M. D. Williams, "Evaluating electronic local government in the UK," Journal of Information Technology, vol. 18, pp. 137-149, 2003.
2. K. J. L. Layne and J. Lee, "Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model," Government Information Quarterly, vol. 18, pp. 122-136, 2001.
3. Z. Irani, T. Elliman, and P. Jackson, "Electronic transformation of government in the U.K.: A research agenda," European Journal of Information Systems, vol. 16, pp. 327-335, 2007.
4. V. Weerakkody and G. Dhillon, "Moving from E-Government to T-Government: A Study of Process Reengineering Challenges in a UK Local Authority Perspective," International Journal of Electronic Government Research, vol. 4, pp. 1-16, 2008.
5. W. S. Shu and R. Moore, "Dynamically reconfigurable university: Formally specifying core operations," Macau September 1998 1998.
6. W. S. Shu and C. F. Ngolah, "Formally modelling time into changing university structures," Journal of the Cameroon Academy of Sciences, vol. 4, pp. 61-74, 2004.
7. V. Peristeras and K. Tarabanis, "Towards an enterprise architecture for public administration using a top-down approach," European Journal of Information Systems, vol. 9, pp. 252-260, 2000.
8. R. Kofler, R. Krimmer, and A. Prosser, "Electronic Voting: Algorithmic and Implementation Issues," in Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'03), vol. 5. Island of Hawaii (Big Island): Computer Societry Press, 2003, pp. 142a.
9. J. van Meel and H. G. Sol, "Business Engineering: Dynanic Modeling Instruments for a Dynamic World," Simulation & Gaming, vol. 27, pp. 440-461, 1996.
10. P. O'Neill and A. S. Sohal, "Business Process Reengineering A review of recent literature" Technovation, vol. 19, pp. 571-581 1999.
11. T. H. Davenport, Process Innovation: Re-engineering Work through Information Technology: Harvard Business School Press, 1993.
12. D. Carr and H. Johansson, Best Practices in Re-engineering: What Works & What Doesn't in the Re-engineering Process. NY: McGraw-Hill, 1995.
13. I. I. Mitroff, F. Betz, L.R. Pondy, and F. Sagasti, "On Managing Science in the System Age: Two schemes for the study of science as a whole systems phenomenon," TIMS Interfaces, vol. 4, pp. 46-58, 1974.
14. Marijn Janssen, "Designing Electronic Intermediaries. An agent-based approach for designing interorganizational coordination mechanisms," Delft University of Technology, Doctoral Dissertation. Delft, The Netherlands 2001.
15. Marijn Janssen and Henk G. Sol, "Evaluating the role of intermediaries in the electronic value chain" Internet Research-Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, vol. 10, pp. 406-417, 2000.
16. A. Galton, Temporal Logic and their Applications: Academic Press, 1987.
17. J. Ma and B. Knight, "Reified temporal logics - A survey," Artificial Intelligence Review, vol. 15, pp. 189-217, 2001.