Tear film surface quality with soft contact lenses using dynamic-area high-speed videokeratoscopy

Eye and Contact Lens

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 227-231

  Alonso Caneiro, David ^a   Iskander, D Robert ^a   Collins, Michael J ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Tear dynamics; Noninvasive methods; Dynamic videokeratography

Indexed keywords

SILICON;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EYELASH; EYELID REFLEX; HIGH SPEED VIDEOKERATOSCOPY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; KERATOSCOPY; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SOFT CONTACT LENS; SURFACE PROPERTY; TEAR FILM;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BLINKING; CONTACT LENSES, HYDROPHILIC; CORNEAL TOPOGRAPHY; HUMANS; HYDROGEL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SILICONES; TEARS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 70349116475     PISSN: 15422321     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e3181b3350f     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Holly FJ, Lemp MA. Tear physiology and dry eyes. Surv Ophthalmol 1977;22:69-87.
2. Tsubota K. Tear dynamics and dry eye. Prog Retin Eye Res 1998;17: 565-569.
3. Mengher LS, Pandher KS, Bron AJ. Non-invasive tear film break-up time: Sensitivity and specificity. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1986;64: 441-444.
4. Yokoi N, Komuro A. Non-invasive methods of assessing the tear film. Exp Eye Res 2004;78:399-407.
5. Montés-Micó R, Cáliz A, Alió JL. Wavefront analysis of higher order aberrations in dry eye patients. J Refract Surg 2004;20:243-247.
6. Koh S, Maeda N, Hirohara Y, et al. Serial measurements of higher-order aberrations after blinking in normal subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:3318-3324.
7. Hagyó K, Csákány B, Lang Z, et al. Variability of higher order wavefront aberrations after blinks. J Refract Surg 2009;25:59-68.
8. Doane MG. An instrument for in vivo tear film interferometry. Optom Vis Sci 1989;66:383-388.
9. Yokoi N, Takehisa Y, Kinoshita S. Correlation of tear lipid layer interference patterns with the diagnosis and severity of dry eye. Am J Ophthalmol 1996;122:818-824.
10. Szczesna DH, Kasprzak HT, Jaronski J, et al. An interferometric method for the dynamic evaluation of the tear film. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2007;85:202-208.
11. Szczesna DH, Jaronski J, Kasprzak HT, et al. Interferometric measurements of dynamic changes of tear film. J Biomed Opt 2006;11:34028.
12. Guillon JP. Non-invasive Tearscope Plus routine for contact lens fitting. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 1998;21(suppl):S31-S40.
13. Lozato PA, Pisella PJ, Baudouin C. The lipid layer of the lachrymal tear film: physiology and pathology (in French). J Fr Ophthalmol 2001;24: 643-658.
14. Németh J, Erdélyi B, Csákány B, et al. High-speed videotopographic measurement of tear film build-up time. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 43:1783-1790.
15. Iskander DR, Collins MJ. Applications of high-speed videokeratoscopy. Clin Exp Optom 2005;88:223-231.
16. Buehren T, Collins MJ, Iskander DR, et al. The stability of corneal topography in the post-blink interval. Cornea 2001;20:826-833.
17. Goto T, Zheng X, Klyce SD, et al. A new method for tear film stability analysis using videokeratography. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;135: 607-612.
18. Montés-Micó R, Alió JL, Muñoz G, et al. Temporal changes in optical quality of air-tear film interface at anterior cornea after blink. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:1752-1757.
19. Montés-Micó R, Alió JL, Charman WN. Dynamic changes in the tear film in dry eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:1615-1619.
20. Iskander DR, Collins MJ, Davis B. Evaluating tear film stability in the human eye with high-speed videokeratoscopy. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2005;52:1939-1949.
21. Alonso-Caneiro D, Iskander DR, Collins MJ. Computationally efficient interference detection in videokeratoscopy images. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP-08) 2008; 1:486-490.
22. Alonso-Caneiro D, Iskander DR, Collins MJ. Estimating corneal surface topography in videokeratoscopy in the presence of strong signal interference. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2008;55:2381-2387.
23. Alonso-Caneiro D, Iskander DR, Collins MJ. Assessment of tear film surface quality using dynamic-area high-speed videokeratoscopy. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2009;56:1473-1481.
24. Kopf M, Yi F, Iskander DR, et al. Tear film quality with soft contact lenses using dynamic videokeratoscopy. J Optom 2008;1:14-21.
25. Tomlinson A. Contact lens-induced dry eye. In: A. Tomlinson, ed. Complications of Contact Lens Wear. Michigan, PA, Mosby, 1992, pp 195-218.
26. Hamano H. The change of precorneal tear film by the application of contact lenses. Contact Intraocul Lens Med J 1981;7:205-209.
27. Mainstone JC, Bruce AS, Golding TR. Tear meniscus measurements in the diagnosis of dry eye. Curr Eye Res 1996;15:653-661.
28. Golding TR, Bruce AS, Mainstone JC. Relationship between tear-meniscus parameters and tear-film break-up. Cornea 1997;16:649-661.
29. Buehren T, Lee B, Collins MJ, et al. Ocular microfluctuations and videokeratoscopy. Cornea 2002;21:346-351.
30. Xie X, Sudhakar R, Zhuang H. Real-time eye feature tracking from a video image sequence using Kalman filter. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 1995; 25:1568-1577.
31. Bruce AS, Mainstone JC, Golding TR. Analysis of tear film breakup on Etafilcon A hydrogel lenses. Biomaterials 2001;22:3249-3256.