WWW sits the SAT: Measuring relational similarity on the web

Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

Volumn 178, Issue , 2008, Pages 333-337

  Bollegala, Danushka ^a   Matsuo, Yutaka ^b   Ishizuka, Mitsuru ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; SEMANTICS;

LANGUAGE PROCESSING; LEXICAL PATTERNS; MULTIPLE CHOICE; NATURAL LANGUAGES; RELATIONAL SIMILARITIES; SEMANTIC RELATIONS; SIMILARITY MEASURE; SUPPORT VECTORS MACHINE; WORD-PAIRS; WORDNET;

SEARCH ENGINES;

EID: 70349107734     PISSN: 09226389     EISSN: 18798314     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-58603-891-5-333     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. P. Cimiano and J. Wenderoth, ‘Automatic acquisition of ranked qualia structures from the web’, in Proc. of ACL’07, pp. 888–895, (2007).
2. B. Falkenhainer, K.D. Forbus, and D. Gentner, ‘Structure mapping engine: Algorithm and examples’, Artificial Intelligence, 41, 1–63, (1989).
3. C. D. Manning and H. Schütze, Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2002.
4. D.L. Medin, R.L. Goldstone, and D. Genter, ‘Similarity involving attributes and relations: Judgments of similarity and difference are not inverse’, Psychological Sciences, 1(1), 64–69, (1990).
5. D.L. Medin, R.L. Goldstone, and D. Gentner, ‘Respects for similarity’, Psychological Review, 6(1), 1–28, (1991).
6. V. Natase and S. Szpakowicz, ‘Exploring noun-modifier semantic relations’, in Proc. of fifth int’l workshop on computational semantics (IWCS-5), pp. 285–301, (2003).
7. J. Pei, J. Han, B. Mortazavi-Asi, J. Wang, H. Pinto, Q. Chen, U. Dayal, and M. Hsu, ‘Mining sequential patterns by pattern-growth: the prefixs-pan approach’, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 16(11), 1424–1440, (2004).
8. J. Platt, ‘Probabilistic outputs for support vector machines and comparison to regularized likelihood methods’, Advances in Large Margin Classifiers, 61–74, (2000).
9. D. Ravichandran and E. Hovy, ‘Learning surface text patterns for a question answering system’, in Proc. of ACL’02, pp. 41–47, (2001).
10. G. Salton and C. Buckley, Introduction to Modern Information Re-treival, McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1983.
11. R. Snow, D. Jurafsky, and A.Y. Ng, ‘Learning syntactic patterns for automatic hypernym discovery’, in Proc. of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) 17, pp. 1297–1304, (2005).
12. P.D. Turney, ‘Measuring semantic similarity by latent relational analysis’, in Proc. of IJCAI’05, pp. 1136–1141, (2005).
13. P.D. Turney, ‘Expressing implicit semantic relations without supervision’, in Proc. of Coling/ACL’06, pp. 313–320, (2006).
14. P.D. Turney, ‘Similarity of semantic relations’, Computational Linguistics, 32(3), 379–416, (2006).
15. P.D. Turney and M.L. Littman, ‘Corpus-based learning of analogies and semantic relations’, Machine Learning, 60, 251–278, (2005).
16. P.D. Turney, M.L. Littman, J. Bigham, and V. Shnayder, ‘Combining independent modules to solve multiple-choice synonym and analogy problems’, in Proc. of RANLP’03, pp. 482–486, (2003).
17. A. Tversky, ‘Features of similarity’, Psychological Review, 84(4), 327–352, (1997).
18. V. Vapnik, Statistical Learning Theory, Wiley, Chichester, GB, 1998.
19. T. Veale, ‘Wordnet sits the sat: A knowledge-based approach to lexical analogy’, in Proc. of ECAI’04, pp. 606–612, (2004).
20. T. Veale and M. T. Keane, ‘The competence of structure mapping on hard analogies’, in Proc. of IJCAI’03, (2003).