Preference modeling by weighted goals with max aggregation

Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 579-587

  Uckelman, Joel ^a   Endriss, Ulle ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGGREGATION FUNCTIONS; PREFERENCE MODELING; PREFERENCE REPRESENTATION; UTILITY FUNCTIONS; WEIGHTED FORMULAS;

KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION;

EID: 70349107580     PISSN: 23341025     EISSN: 23341033     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Boutilier, C., and Hoos, H. H. 2001. Bidding languages for combinatorial auctions. In Proc. Intl. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-2001), 1211-1217. Morgan Kaufmann.
2. Boutilier, C.; Brafman, R. I.; Domshlak, C.; Hoos, H. H.; and Poole, D. 2004. CP-nets: A tool for representing and reasoning with conditional ceteris paribus preference statements. Journal of Artifcial Intelligence Research 21:135- 191.
3. Bouveret, S.; Fargier, H.; Lang, J.; and Lemâitre, M. 2005. Allocation of indivisible goods: A general model and some complexity results. In Proc. 4th Intl. Joint Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS-2005), 1309-1310. ACM Press.
4. Bouveret, S. 2007. Allocation et partage ́equitables de ressources indivisibles: mod́elisation, complexit́e et algorithmique. Ph.D. Dissertation, Supáero/University of Toulouse.
5. Chevaleyre, Y.; Endriss, U.; and Lang, J. 2006. Expressive power of weighted propositional formulas for cardinal preference modelling. In Doherty, P.; Mylopoulos, J.; and Welty, C., eds., Proc. 10th Intl. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR-2006), 145-152. AAAI Press.
6. Coste-Marquis, S.; Lang, J.; Liberatore, P.; and Marquis, P. 2004. Expressive power and succinctness of propositional languages for preference representation. In Dubois, D.; Welty, C. A.; and Williams, M.-A., eds., Proc. 9th Intl. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR-2004), 203-212. AAAI Press.
7. Gonzales, C., and Perny, P. 2004. GAI networks for utility elicitation. In Dubois, D.; Welty, C. A.; and Williams, M.-A., eds., Proc. 9th Intl. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR-2004), 224-234. AAAI Press.
8. van Hoesel, S., and M̈uller, R. 2001. Optimization in electronic markets: examples in combinatorial auctions. Netnomics 3(1):23-33.
9. Lafage, C., and Lang, J. 2000. Logical representation of preferences for group decision making. In Proc. 7th Intl. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR-2000), 457-468. Morgan Kaufmann.
10. Lang, J. 2004. Logical preference representation and combinatorial vote. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 42(1-3):37-71.
11. Moulin, H. 1988. Axioms of Cooperative Decision Making. Cambridge University Press.
12. Nisan, N. 2006. Bidding languages for combinatorial auctions. In Cramton, P.; Shoham, Y.; and Steinberg, R., eds., Combinatorial Auctions. MIT Press. 215-232.
13. Papadimitriou, C. 1994. Computational Complexity. Addison-Wesley.
14. Pinkas, G. 1995. Reasoning, nonmonotonicity and learning in connectionist networks that capture propositional knowledge. Artificial Intelligence 77(2):203-247.
15. Sandholm, T. W. 2002. Algorithm for optimal winner determination in combinatorial auctions. Artificial Intelligence 135(1-2):1-54.
16. Uckelman, J., and Endriss, U. 2007. Preference representation with weighted goals: Expressivity, succinctness, complexity. In Proc. AAAI Workshop on Preference Handling for Artificial Intelligence (AiPref-2007), 85-92.