Evaluation of SWAT input parameter sensitivity for the little river watershed

2005 ASAE Annual International Meeting

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages

  Feyereisen, Gary W ^a   Strickland, Timothy C ^a   Bosch, David D ^a   Batten, H L ^a  

^a SOUTHEAST WATERSHED RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Hydrologie modeling; Parameters; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

ANNUAL AVERAGE; BASEFLOWS; CALCULATED VALUES; CHEMICAL LOADING; COASTAL PLAIN; FIELD SCALE; GEORGIA; HYDROLOGIC PARAMETERS; HYDROLOGIC RESPONSE; HYDROLOGIE MODELING; INPUT PARAMETER; LAND MANAGEMENT PRACTICES; MODEL INPUTS; MODEL OUTPUTS; PARAMETERS; PEAK FLOWS; RIVER WATERSHEDS; SOIL WATER ASSESSMENT TOOL; SURFACE RUNOFFS; UNCERTAINTY; WATER QUANTITIES; WATER YIELD; WATERSHED-SCALE MODELS; WET AND DRY;

GEOLOGIC MODELS; GROUNDWATER; GROUNDWATER FLOW; LAND USE; LANDFORMS; LOADING; RUNOFF; SOIL CONSERVATION; SOIL MOISTURE; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; UNDERWATER SOILS; WATER ANALYSIS; WATERSHEDS;

HYDRAULIC MODELS;

EID: 70349103394     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Arnold, J.G., R. Srinivasan, R.S. Muttiah, and J.R. Williams. 1998. Large-area hydrologie modeling and assessment: Part I. Model development. J. American Water Res. Assoc. 34(1): 73-89. (Pubitemid 28190080)
2. Benaman, J. and C.A. Shoemaker. 2004. Methodology for analyzing ranges of uncertain model parameters and their impact on total maximum daily load process. J. of Environmental Engineering 130(6): 648-656. (Pubitemid 38762982)
3. Bosch, D.D., J.M. Sheridan, H.L. Batten, and J.G. Arnold. 2004. Evaluation of the SWAT model on a coastal plain agricultural watershed. Trans. ASAE 47(5): 1493-1506.
4. Eckhardt, K., S. Haverkamp, N. Fohrer, and H.-G. Frede. 2002. SWAT-G, a version of SWAT99.2 modified for application to low mountain range catchments. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 27: 641-644.
5. nd ed. Ames, IA: Iowa State Press.
6. Haan, C.T., B. Allred, D.E. Storm, G.J. Sabbagh, and S. Prabhu. 1995. Statistical procedure for evaluating hydrologic/water quality models. Trans. ASAE 38(3): 725-733.
7. Haan, P.K., and R.W. Skaggs. 2003. Effect of parameter uncertainty on DRAINMOD predictions: II. Nitrogen loss. Trans. ASAE 46(4): 1069-1075. (Pubitemid 37358465)
8. Huisman, J.A., L. Breuer, and H.-G. Frede. 2004. Sensitivity of simulated hydrological fluxes towards changes in soil properties in response to land use change. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 29: 749-758.
9. Lenhart, T., K. Eckhardt, N. Fohrer, and H.-G. Frede. 2002. Comparison of two different approaches of sensitivity analysis. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 27: 645-654.
10. Nash, J.E., and J.V. Sutcliffe. 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models: Part I. A discussion of principles. J. Hydrology 10(3): 282-290.
11. Sheridan, J.M. 1997. Rainfall-streamflow relations for Coastal Plain watersheds. Applied Eng. in Agrie. 13(3): 333-1113
12. Sheridan, J.M. and A. Shirmohammadi. 1986. Application of curve number procedure on Coastal Plain watersheds. ASAE Paper No. 86-2505. St. Joseph, Mich.: ASAE.
13. Shirmohammadi, A., W.G. Knisel, and J.M. Sheridan. 1984. An approximate method for partitioning daily streamflow data. J. Hydrology 74(3-4): 335-354. (Pubitemid 16265766)
14. Sohrabi, T.M., A. Shirmohammadi, T.W. Chu., H. Montas, and A.P. Nejadhashemi. 2002. Incorporating uncertainty analysis in SWAT2000 model predictions. ASAE Paper No. 022013. St. Joseph, Mich.: ASAE.
15. USDA-ARS. 2005. Conservation Effects Assessment Project. Project Number: 500-43-001-101 Washington, D.C: USDA Agricultural Research Service. Available at: http://www.ars.usda.gov/research/projects/projects.htm?ACCN-NO=407655. Accessed 14 July 2005.
16. Van Liew, J.G. Arnold, and D.D. Bosch. 2005a. Problems and potential of autocalibrating a hydrologic model. Trans. ASAE48(3): 1025-1040.
17. Van Liew, T.L. Veith, D.D. Bosch, and J.G. Arnold. 2005b. Autocalibration of SWAT: Comparison on five USDA-ARS experimental watersheds. J. Soil and Water Conservation. In review.