From urban park to sustainable park: Conceptual and analytical bases for the evaluation of urban park sustainability;Del parque urbano al parque sostenible. Bases conceptuales y analíticas para la evaluación de la sustentabilidad de parques urbanos

Revista de Geografia Norte Grande

Volumn , Issue 43, 2009, Pages 31-49

  Restrepo, Luis Aníbal Vélez ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE COLOMBIA   (Colombia)

Author keywords

Sustainable park; Urban green areas; Urban sustainability

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; GEOPHYSICAL ARRAY; MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; PARK MANAGEMENT; SUSTAINABILITY; URBAN REGION;

EID: 70349093055     PISSN: 03798682     EISSN: 07183402     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. ABOLINA, C. & ZILANS, A. Evaluation of urban sustainability in specific sectors in Latvia. Evaluation, Development and sustainability, 2002, vol.4, p. 299-314.
2. ALBERTI, M. Measuring urban sustainability. Environmental Impact Assessment review, 1996, vol.16, p. 381-424.
3. ÁREA METROPOLITANA DEL VALLE DE ABURRA (AMVA). Producción más limpia en el sector Servicios. Medellín: AMVA, 2007.
4. ASAKAWA, S.; YOSHIDA; K. & YABE, K. Perceptions of urban stream corridors within the greenway system of Sapporo, Japan. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2004, vol.68, p. 167-182.
5. AUSTIN, D. M.; FURR, L. A. & SPINE, M. The effects of neighborhood conditions on perceptions of safety. Journal of criminal justice, 2002, vol.30, p. 417-427.
6. BARBOSA, O.; TRATALOS, J. A.; ARMSWORTH, P. R.; DAVIES, R. G.; FULLER, R. A., JONSON, P. & GASTON, K. J. Who benefits to access to green space? A case study from Sheffield, UK. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2007, vol.83, p. 187-195. (Pubitemid 350010989)
7. BERKE, P. R. & MANTA, M. C. Are we planning for sustainable development?. An evaluation of 30 comprehensive plans. Journal of the American Planning association, 2000, vol.66, No 1, p. 21-31.
8. BJERKE, T.; OSTDAHL, T.; THRANE, C. & STRUMSE, E. Vegetation density of urban parks and perceived appropiateness for recreation. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 2006, vol.5, p. 35-44.
9. BREUSTE, J. H. Decision making, planning and design for the conservation of indigenous vegetation within urban development. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2004, vol.68, p. 439-452.
10. BRIFFETT, C. Is managed recreational use compatible with effective habitat and wildlife occurrence in urban open space corridor systems? Landscape Research, 2001, vol.26, No 2, p. 137-163.
11. CANO, G. A. y CANO, G. J. Mejoramiento en el manejo de los residuos sólidos en una industria metalmecánica. Revista de producción + limpia, 2008, vol.3, No 1, p. 111-116. Disponible en Internet: www.metropol.gov.co/produccionmaslimpia/contenidos
12. CHIESURA, A. The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2004, vol.68, p. 129-138. (Pubitemid 38362153)
13. CILLIERS, S. S.; MÜLLER, N. & DREWES, E. Overview on urban nature conservation: situation in the western-grassland biome of South Africa. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2004, vol.3, p. 49-62.
14. CLARK, J. R.; MATHENY, N. P.; CROSS, G. & WAKE, V. A model of urban forest sustainability. Journal of Arboriculture, 1997, vol.23, No 1, p. 17-30.
15. COMISIÓN NACIONAL DEL MEDIO AMBIENTE (CONAMA). Indicadores para gestión de residuos sólidos municipales. Santiago: CONAMA, 2001.
16. CRANZ, G. & BOLAND, M. Defining the sustainable park: a fifth model for urban parks. Landscape journal, 2004, vol.23, p. 102-119.
17. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA). Guideline for reporting of daily air quality - Air Quality index (AQI) Office of air quality. Planning and Standards. Research triangle park. Washington: EPA, 1999.
18. ESTRUCPLAN ON LINE. Gestión de residuos, 2008. Buenos Aires: Estrucplan, 2008. Disponible en Internet: www.estrucplan.com.ar
19. FEHR, M.; SOUSA, K. A.; PEREIRA, A. F. N. & PELIZER, L. C. Proposal of indicators to assess urban sustainability in Brazil. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2004, vol.6, p. 355-366.
20. FORMAN, R. T. T. Land mosaics. The ecology of landscapes and regions. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
21. FORMAN, R. T. T. & GODRON, M. Landscape ecology. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1986.
22. FORSYTH, A. & MUSACCHIO, L. Designing small parks. A manual for addressing social and ecological concerns. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2005.
23. FREEMAN, C. Development of a simple method for site survey and assessment in urban areas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1999, vol.44, p. 1-11. (Pubitemid 29130908)
24. FROHN, R. Remote sensing for landscape ecology. New York: Lewis Publishers, 1997.
25. GARCÍA, S. y GUERRERO, M. Indicadores de sustentabilidad ambiental en la gestion de espacios verdes. Parque urbano Monte Calvario, Tandil, Argentina. Revista de Geografía Norte Grande, 2006, No 35, p. 45-57.
26. GOBSTER, P. H. & WESTPHAL, L. M. The human dimensions of urban greenways: planning for recreation and related experiences. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2004, vol.68, p. 147-165.
27. GONZALEZ, M. J. y DE LÁZARO, M. L. Indicadores básicos para la planificación de la sostenibilidad urbana local. Revista Bibliográfica de Geografía y Ciencias Sociales Universidad de Barcelona, 2005, vol.X, No 586. Disponible en Internet: http://www.ub.es/ geocrit/b3w-586.htm
28. GUSTAFSON, E. J. & PARKER, G. R. Relationship between landcover proportion and indices of landscape spatial pattern. Landscape ecology, 1992, vol.7, No 2, p. 101-110.
29. GUSTAVSSON, R.; HERMY, M.; KONIJNENDIJK, C. & STEIDLE-SCHWAHN, A. Management of urban woodland and parkssearching for creative and sustainable concepts. In: KONIJNENDIJK, C. et al. (eds). Urban forest and trees. Spinger: Berlin Heidelberg, 2005, p. 370-397.
30. HALVORSEN, K. T. "The green poster". A method to evaluate the sustainability of the urban green structure. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2000, vol.20, p. 359-371.
31. HARGIS, C. D.; BISSONETTE, J. A. & DAVID, J. L. The behavior of landscape metrics commonly used in the study of habitat fragmentation. Landscape ecology, 1998, vol. 13, p. 167-186.
32. HERNÁNDEZ, A. A. Informe sobre los indicadores locales de sostenibilidad utilizados por los municipios españoles firmantes de la carta de Aalborg, 2003. Madrid: Ciudades para un futuro más sostenible, 2004. Disponible en Internet: www.habitat.aq.upm.es
33. HIGUERAS, E. Urbanismo bioclimático. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili S. A., 2006.
34. HOUGH, M. Naturaleza y ciudad. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili S. A., 1998.
35. HUANG, S.; WONG, J. & CHEN, T. A framework of indicator system measuring Taipei's urban sustainability. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1998, vol.42, p. 15-27.
36. JAEGER, J. A. G.; BERTILLER, R.; SCHWICK, C.; MÜLLER, K.; STEINMEIER, C.; EWALD, K. C. & GHAZOUL, J. Implementing landscape fragmentation as an indicator in the Swiss Monitoring System of Sustainable development (MONET). Journal of environmental management, 2008, vol.88, No 4, p. 737-751.
37. JIM, C. & CHEN, W Perceptions and attitudes of residents toward urban green spaces and edges in Guangzhou (China). Journal of environmental management, 2006, vol.38, No 3, p. 338-349.
38. JIM, C. Y. Green-space preservation and allocation for sustainable greening of compact cities. Cities, 2004, vol.21, No 4, p. 311-320.
39. JORGENSEN, A.; HICHMOUGH, J. & CALVERT, T. Woodland spaces and edges: their impact on perception of safety and preference. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2002, vol.60, p. 135-150.
40. KENDLE, T. & FORBES, S. Urban nature conservation. Landscape management in the urban countryside. London: Chapman and Hall, 1997.
41. KROLL, A. J. & HAUFLER, J. B. Development and evaluation of habitat models at multiple spatial scales: a case study with the dusky flycatcher. Forest ecology and management, 2006, vol.229, p. 161-169.
42. LEAL, G. D. Introducción al ecourbanismo. Bogotá: Ecoe ediciones, 2004.
43. LI, F.; WANG, R.; PAULUSSEN, J. & LIU, X. Comprehensive concept planning of urban greening based on ecological principles: a case study in Beijing, China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2005, vol.72, p. 325-336.
44. LINDSEY, G. Sustainability and urban greenways. Indicators in Indianapolis. Journal of the American Planning Association, 2003, vol.69, No 2, p. 165-180.
45. LIVINGSTON, M.; SHAW, W. W. & HARRIS, L. K. A model for assessing wildlife habitats in urban landscapes of eastern Pima County, Arizona (USA). Landscape and Urban Planning, 2003, vol.64, p. 131-144.
46. MACGARIGAL, K. & MARKS, B. J. FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. Portland: USDA Forest Service, 1995.
47. MACHADO, A. An index of naturalness. Journal for the nature conservation, 2004, vol.12, p. 95-110.
48. MEDELLÍN, CÓMO VAMOS (MCV). Informe de percepción- seguridad 2008. Medellín: MCV, 2008. Disponible en Internet: www.medellincomovamos.org
49. MILLER, S. J. & WARDROP, D. H. Adapting the floristic quality assessment index to indicate anthropogenic disturbance in central Pennsylvania wetlands. Ecological Indicators, 2006, vol.6, p. 313-326.
50. MILLIGAN, D. & RAEDEKE, K. Wildlife habitat design in urban forest landscapes. In: BRADLEY, G. (ed.). Urban forest landscapes. Integrating multidisciplinary perspectives. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1995, p. 139-149.
51. MINISTRY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT. Environmental performance Indicator. Confirmed Indicators for solid waste, hazardous waste and contamined sites. Wellington: Ministry for the environment, 2000.
52. NIEMELÄ, J. Ecology and urban planning. Biodiversity and conservation, 1999, vol.8, p. 119-131.
53. ÖZGÜNER, H. & KENDLE, A. Public attitudes towards naturalistic versus designed landscapes in the city of Sheffield (UK). Landscape and Urban Planning, 2006, vol.74, p. 139-157.
54. PLATT, R. From commons to commons: evolving concepts of open space in North American cities. In: PLATT, R.; ROWNTREE, R. & MUICK, P. (eds.): The ecological city. Amherst: The University of Massachusetts Press, 1994, p. 21-40.
55. PURCELL, A. T. & LAMB, R. J. Preference and naturalness: an ecological approach. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1998, vol.42, p. 57-66.
56. REBELE, F. Urban ecology and special features of urban ecosystems. Global ecology and blogeography letters, 1994, vol.4, p. 173-187.
57. ROOVERS, P.; DUMONT, B.; GULINCK, H. & HERMY, M. Recreacionisť perceived obstruction of field and shrub layer vegetation. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 2006, vol.4, p. 47-53.
58. SCIPIONI, A.; MAÍZ, A.; ZULIANI, F. & MAZON, M. The ISO 14031 standard to guide the urban sustainability measurement process: an Italian experience. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2008, vol.16, No 12, p. 1247-1257.
59. SCOTTISH ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AGENCY (SEPA). Horizontal guidance for noice. Part 2 - Noice assessment and control. Integrated pollution prevention and control. Bristol: Environment Agency, 2004.
60. TORO, G. V. y MARÍN, L. A. Índice de calidad del aire para el valle de Aburra. Revista de producción + limpia, 2006, vol.1, No 1, p. 102-107. Disponible en Internet: www.metropol.gov.co/produccionmaslimpia/ contenidos
61. TYRVÄINEN, L.; MAKINEN, J. & SCHIPPERIJN, J. Tools for mapping social values of urban woodlands and other green areas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2007, vol.79, p. 5-19.
62. UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM (UNEP). Solid waste management. Appendix C. Performance indicators for solid waste services. Nairobi: UNEP, 2005. Disponible en Internet: www.unep.org.jp/ietc/publications
63. URIBE, M. C. Cambio del sistema de calentamiento de agua empleando calderas por paneles solares y otros procesos de producción mas limpia. Revista de producción + limpia, 2007, vol.2, No 2, p. 31-37. Disponible en Internet: www.metropol.gov.co/produccionmaslimpia/contenidos
64. VAN DIJK, M. P. & MINGSHUN, Z. Sustainability indices as a tool for urban managers, evidence from four medium- sizes Chinese cities. Environmental impact assessment review, 2005, vol.25, p. 667-688.
65. VAN HERZELE, A. & WIEDEMANN, T. A monitoring tool for the provision of accessible and attractive urban green spaces. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2003, vol.63, p. 109-126.
66. VÉLEZ, L. A. La conservación de la naturaleza urbana. Un nuevo reto en la gestión ambiental de las ciudades, para el siglo XXI. Bitácora, 2007, vol.11, No 1, p. 20-27.
67. VÉLEZ, L. A. y GÓMEZ, S. A. Un marco conceptual y analítico para estimar la integridad ecológica a escala de paisaje. Arbor, 2008, vol.CLXXXIV, No 729, p. 31-44.
68. WARD, T. C. Urban open space in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2002, vol.60, p. 59-72. (Pubitemid 34817021)
69. ZILANS, A. & ABOLINA, K. A methodology for assessing urban sustainability: aalborg commitments baseline review for Riga, Latvia. Environmental, development and sustainability, vol.11, No 1, 2007.