How should banks govern the environment? Challenging the construction of action versus veto

Business Strategy and the Environment

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 149-161

  Coulson, Andrea B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Banks; Credit; Governance; Harm; NGOs; Risk

Indexed keywords

BANKING; CONFERENCE PROCEEDING; CREDIT PROVISION; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION; PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK PERCEPTION;

EID: 70249136926     PISSN: 09644733     EISSN: 10990836     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bse.584     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Action Aid, Amnesty International, CAFOD, Christian Aid, The Corner House, Friends of the Earth, Global Witness, New Economics Foundation, Tax Justice Network, WWF. 2005. A Big Deal? Corporate Social Responsibility and the Financial Sector in Europe. Core Coalition Press Release, December, 2. CORE Coalition: London.
2. Adams J. 1995. Risk. University College Press: London.
3. Ählström J, Sjöström E. 2005. CSOs and business partnerships: strategies for interaction. Business Strategy and the Environment 14: 230-240.
4. Ayres I, Braithwaite J. 1992. Responsive regulation. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
5. BANKTrack. 2003. Collevecchio Declaration; the Role and Responsibility of Financial Institutions. http://www.banktrack.org [1 April 2003].
6. BANKTrack. 2004. Standards at Stake: Exploring Common Ground Between Equator Banks and Civil Society on IFC's Proposed Performance Standards. http://www.banktrack.org [1 December 2004].
7. BANKTrack. 2005. Unproven Principles: the Equator Principles at Year Two, an anniversary assessment prepared by Michelle Chan-Fishel, Friends of the Earth (FoE) US, June.
8. Baue W. 2003. Will Equator Principles Deliver Social and Environmental Responsibility from Banks? News, Social Funds. http://www.SocialFunds.com [5 June 2003].
9. Black J. 2003. Mapping the contours of Contemporary Financial Services Regulation, Discussion Paper 17. CARR, LSE.
10. Bressers H, de Bruijn T. 2005. Conditions for the success of negotiated agreements: partnerships for environmental improvement in the Netherlands. Business Strategy and the Environment 14: 241-254.
11. British Bankers Association (BBA). 1993. Position Statement: Banks and the Environment, Issues Brief, September. BBA: London.
12. British Bankers Association (BBA). 1995. The Environment Bill: Lender Liability, Issues Brief, March. BBA: London.
13. Cashman A, Lewis L. 2007. Topping up or watering down? Sustainable development in the privatized UK water industry. Business Strategy and the Environment 16: 93-105.
14. CEE Bankwatch Network. 2002. Sustainable Theory - Unsustainable Practice? Billions for Sustainability? - Third briefing. CEE Bankwatch Network: Budapest.
15. Chan-Fishel M. 2003. Pressure Groups Target the Private Banks Behind Corporate Misdeeds, Friends of the Earth (FoE) (US) Press Release, 27 January. FoE: Washington, DC.
16. Cooper G. 2002. Room for improvement on banks' green risks. Environmental Finance October: 7.
17. Coulson A. 2002. Benchmarking Study: Environmental Credit Risk Factors in the Pan-European Banking Sector, ISIS Governance and Socially Responsible Investment Report. ISIS Asset Management (now F&C Asset Management): London.
18. Coulson AB. 2006. Contesting Control: Environmental Governance by Commercial Bank Lenders, University of Strathclyde working paper.
19. Coulson A. 2007. Environmental and social assessment in sustainable finance. In Sustainability Accounting and Accountability, Bebbington J, O'Dwyer B, Unerman J (eds). Routledge: London; Chapter 13.
20. Eisner M. 2004. Corporate environmentalism, regulatory reform, and industry self-regulation: toward genuine regulatory reinvention in the United States. Governance: an International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions 17(2): 145-167.
21. Emel J. 2002 An inquiry into the green disciplining of capital. Environment and Planning A 34: 827-843.
22. Equator Principle Financial Institutions. 2006. Financial Institutions Announce Revision of Equator Principles Underscoring the Global Application of Environmental and Social Risk Management, press release, 6 July.
23. Equator Principle Financial Institutions. 2006a. The 'Equator Principles: a financial industry benchmark for determining, assessing and managing social and environmental risk in project fi nance. July. http://www.equator-principles.com [6 July 2006].
24. Friends of the Earth (FoE). 2003. Collevecchio Declaration on Financial Institutions and Sustainability. http://www.foe.org/camps/ intl/declaration.html [27 January 2003].
25. Friends of the Earth (FoE). 2005. Barclays and the Financing of the Narmada Dams, briefing, January. FoE: London.
26. Friends of the Earth (FoE). 2006. Sustainability and Accountability in the Financial Services Sector: Regulatory and Public Policy Recommendations. http://www.foe.org/camps/intl/financialregs.html [27 January 2003].
27. Ganzi J, Erbiste B. 2003. Environmental, Social, Health and Safety Risk Management Manual for Financial Institutions, Report prepared for Environment and Finance Enterprise (EFE) on behalf of IDB-PRI. EFE: Chapel Hill.
28. Garcia E. 2005. Guiding the financial sector. Environmental Finance October: 28-29.
29. Global Policy Forum (GPF). 2003. NGO Collective Analysis of the Equator Principles. GPF: New York. Focus on Finance. http://www.globalpolicy.org/soceon/ffd/2003/06ngos.htm [30 June 2003].
30. Gray R, Bebbington J, Collison D. 2006. NGOs, civil society and accountability: making the people accountable to capital. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 19(3): 319-348.
31. Gunningham N, Grabosky P. 1998. Smart regulation designing environmental policy. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
32. Gunningham N, Kagan RA, Thornton D. 2002. Social Licence and Environmental Protection: why businesses go beyond compliance, Discussion Paper 8. CARR, LSE.
33. Hajer M. 1995. The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Polity Process. Open University Press: Oxford.
34. House of Lords. 1995. Environment Bill. 11 July, Col. 1495-1498. House of Lords: London.
35. Hutter B. 2005. The Attractions of Risk-based Regulation: accounting for the emergence of risk ideas in regulation, Discussion Paper 33. CARR, LSE.
36. Hutter B. 2006. The Role of Non-State Actors in Regulation, Discussion Paper 37. CARR, LSE.
37. Hutter B, O'Mahony J. 2004. The Role of Civil Society Organisations in Regulating Business, Discussion Paper 26. CARR, LSE.
38. Hutter B, Jones C. 2006. Business Risk Management Practices: The Influences of State Regulatory Agencies and Non-State Sources, Discussion Paper 41. CARR, LSE.
39. Kelly M, Stoll T. 1998. Profitability and Responsibility in the 21st Century, UNEP Financial Institutions Initiative, Fourth International Round-Table Meeting on Finance and the Environment. Cambridge, 1998. UNEP: Geneva.
40. Kochladze M, Gujaraidze N, Gujaraidze K, Kvinikadze K, Titvinidze V, Abashidze B. 2004. Baku - Tbilisi - Ceyhan Pipeline, the BTC Company and Social and Environmental Obligations, research report. CEE Bankwatch Network: Budapest.
41. Kurunmäki L, Miller P. 2004. Modernisation, Partnerships and the Management of Risk, CARR Discussion Paper 31. CARR, LSE.
42. Kyte R, Johnson L. 2006. A question of avoiding greenwash, Q&A on Ft.com. Sustainable Banking, Financial Times Report. Financial Times 12 June: 4.
43. LaFrance J, Lehmann M. 2005. Corporate awakening - why (some) corporations embrace public-private partnerships. Business Strategy and the Environment 14: 216-229.
44. Lash S. 1993. Reflexive modernisation - the aesthetic dimension. Theory, Culture and Society 10(1): 1-23.
45. Lash S. 2001. Recognition and difference: politics, identity and multiculture. Theory, Culture and Society 18(2/3): 1-19.
46. Lash S. 2002. Critique of Information. Sage: London.
47. Liberatore A. 2005. Governance and participatory approaches in Europe. In Governance and Sustainability; new challenges for states, companies and civil society, Petschow U, Rosenau J, Ulrich von Weizsäcker E (eds). Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield, UK; Chapter 8.
48. Lundgren M, Catasús B. 2000. The banks' impact on the natural environment - on the space between 'what is' and 'what if'. Business Strategy and Environment 9: 186-195.
49. Matthew E, Willem van Gelder J. 2001. Paper Tiger, Hidden Dragons; the Responsibility of International Financial Institutions for Indonesian Forest Destruction, Social Conflict and the Financial Crisis of Asia Pulp & Paper, Friends of the Earth (FoE) report. FoE: London.
50. McKenzie G, Wolfe S. 2004. The impact of environmental risk on the UK banking sector. Applied Financial Economics 14: 1005-1016.
51. Mineral Policy Institute (MPI). 2004. The Equator Principles: Banks Adopt Voluntary Standards in Project Finance, position statement. MPI: NSW, Australia. http//www.mpi.org.au/campaigns/financing/private/ equatorbanks [25 November 2004].
52. Missbach A. 2004. The equator principles: drawing the line for socially responsible banks? An interim review from an NGO perspective. Development 47(3): 78-84.
53. Neu D, Ocampo Gomez E, Graham C, Heincke M. 2005. 'Informing' technologies and the World Bank. Accounting, Orgnaizations and Society 31(7): 635-662.
54. Neu D, Heincke M. 2004. The subaltern speaks: financial relations and the limits of governmentality. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 15: 179-206.
55. Newton A. 2004. NGOs Bring Bank Scrutiny Bank on Track. Ethical Corporation Online, 2 May.
56. O'Dwyer B. 2005. The construction of a social account: a case study in an overseas aid agency. Accounting, Organizations and Society 30: 279-296.
57. Oekom Research. 2003. Banking Sector Rating; Environmental and Social Standards in the Areas of Forest Conversion and Forestry, research paper prepared for WWF Germany. Oekom Research: Munich.
58. Oekom Research. 2006. Global sustainability rating of financial services providers: Australia gets gold, USA is eliminated. Industry News, 2 March. Oekom Research: Munich.
59. O'Riordan T, Cameron J. 1994. Interpreting the Precautionary Principle. Earthscan: London.
60. O'Rourke A. 2003. A new politics of engagement: shareholder activism for corporate social responsibility. Business Strategy and the Environment 12(4); 227-239.
61. Pearce B, Ganzi J. 2003. Engaging the Mainstream with Sustainability: a Survey of Investor Engagement on Corporate Social, Environmental and Ethical Performance, research report, sponsored by Royal and SunAlliance. Forum for the Future: London.
62. Regéczi D. 2005. Limited partnership: the lack of sustainable development in relation to participation in Hungarian public-private partnerships. Business Strategy and the Environment 14: 205-215.
63. Scott M. 2006. Ethical stance gives bottom-line boost. Rewards for banks: the benefits are numerous enough to be measured. Sustainable Banking, Financial Times Report. Financial Times 12 June: 4.
64. Sevastopulo D. 2004. Banks contest ban proposed for coal and oil extraction. Financial Times 5 April (Washington). http://www.equator-principles.com [5 April 2004].
65. Steele J. 2004. Risks and Legal Theory. Hart: Oxford.
66. Thompson M, Ellis R, Wildavsky A. 1990. Cultural Theory, Political Culture Series. Westview: Oxford.
67. Ulph A, McKenzie G, Jewell T, Steele J, Wolfe S. 1999. The Financial Implications of Environmental Legislation, ESRC End of Award Report - Full Report (L320253226).
68. Unerman J, O'Dwyer B. 2006a. Theorising accountability for NGO advocacy. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 19(3): 349-376.
69. Unerman J, O'Dwyer B. 2006b. On James Bond and the importance of NGO accountability. Guest Editorial. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 19(3): 305-318.
70. Vaughan S. 1994. Greening Financial Markets, first report of the UNEP Round-Table Meeting on Commercial Banks and the Environment, Geneva, 1994. UNEP: Geneva.
71. Watchman P. 2005. Banking on Responsibility. Part 1 of Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer Equator Principles Survey 2005: The Banks. Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer: London.
72. Watchman P. 2006. Banks, business and human rights. Butterworths Journal of International Banking and Financial Law February: 46-50.
73. Watchman P, July C. 2006. A new environment. Legal Week: Insolvency, Banking and Finance 2 February: 24.
74. Waygood S, Wehrmeyer W. 2003. A critical assessment of how non-governmental organizations use the capital markets to achieve their aims: a UK study. Business Strategy and the Environment 12(6): 372-385.
75. World Commission on the Ethics of Scientifi c Knowledge and Technology (COMEST). 2005. The Precautionary Principle, position statement. UNESCO: Paris.
76. Wright C. 2006. Conservation You Can Bank On. 31 January. http://www.equator-principles.com [31 January 2006].
77. WWF, BANKTrack. 2006. Shaping the Future of Sustainable Finance: Moving from Paper Promises to Performance, Project 2060. WWF-UK: Surrey.