An exploratory investigation of the periodic performance evaluation processes for marketing faculty

Journal of Marketing Education

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 143-153

  Shepherd, C David ^a   Carley, Susan S ^b   Stuart, Randy S ^b  

^a GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY   (Georgia)

^b University of Hawaii   (Georgia)

Author keywords

Faculty appraisal; Faculty performance evaluation; Periodic performance evaluation; Promotion; Tenure

Indexed keywords

EID: 70249136206     PISSN: 02734753     EISSN: 15526550     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0273475308326407     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Alstete, J. W. (2000). Post-tenure faculty development: Building a system for faculty improvement and appreciation (AHSE-ERIC Higher Education Report Series, 27[4]). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2. Baez, B., & Centra, J. A. (1995). Tenure, promotion, and reappointment: Legal and administrative implications (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, No. 1). Washington, DC: School of Education and Human Development, George Washington University.
3. Beltramini, R. F., Schlacter, J. L., & Kelley, C. (1985). Marketing faculty promotion and tenure policies and practices. Journal of Marketing Education, 7(2), 74-80.
4. Bennis, W. G., & O'Toole, J. (2005). How business schools lost their way. Harvard Business Review, 83(5), 96-104.
5. Bohrer, P., & Dolphin, R., Jr. (1985). Expectations and support for scholarly activity in schools of business. Journal of Education for Business, 61(3), 101-105.
6. Boya, U. O., & Robicheaux, R. A. (1992). Teaching, research, service, and external compensation activities: Expected versus actual work-styles among marketing professors. Journal of Marketing Education, 14(2), 68-81.
7. Burnett, J. J., Amason, R. D., & Cunningham, P. (1989). What makes marketing academicians successful? An assessment of teaching, publishing, and service. Journal of Marketing Education, 11(3), 7-11.
8. Clement, R. W., & Stevens, G. E. (1989). Performance appraisal in higher education: Comparing departments of management with other business units. Public Personnel Management, 18(3), 263-278.
9. Coe, R. K., & Weinstock, I. (1983). Evaluating journal publications of marketing professors: A second look. Journal of Marketing Education, 5(1), 37-42.
10. Davis, G. B. (1980). A systematic evaluation of publications for promotion of MIS academics. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Information Systems (pp. 206-216). Philadelphia: n.p.
11. D'Onofrio, M. J., Slama, M. E., & Tashchian, A. (1988). Faculty evaluation perspectives in colleges of business: How marketing department heads' evaluations differ from those of department heads in other business disciplines. Journal of Marketing Education, 10(2), 21-28.
12. Ehie, I. C., & Karathanos, D. (1994). Business faculty performance evaluation based on the new AACSB accreditation standards. Journal of Education for Business, 69(5), 257-262.
13. Fry, E. H., Walters, C. G., & Scheuermann, L. E. (1985). Perceived quality of fifty selected journals: Academicians and practitioners. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 13(2), 352-361.
14. Holley, W., Jr., Halpin, G., & Johnson, G. (1982). Assessment of faculty performance appraisal. Journal of the College and University Personnel Association, 33(1), 14-18.
15. Hult, G. T. M., Neese, W. T., & Bashaw, R. E. (1997). Faculty perceptions of marketing journals. Journal of Marketing Education, 19(1), 37-52.
16. Kelly, R. (2005, October 18). College costs going nowhere but up. CNNMoney.com. Retrieved September 8, 2008, from http://money.cnn.com/2005/10/17/pf/college/college_costs/index.htm
17. Mason, J. B., & Sims, J. T. (1982, Fall). Tenure is a million dollar decision over 25 to 30 years. Marketing Educator, 1, 3.
18. McDermott, D. R., Urban, D. J., & Wayland, J. P. (1994). Formalizing evaluation procedures for marketing faculty research performance. Journal of Education for Business, 70(1), 48-53.
19. Meyer, H. H. (1991). A solution to the performance appraisal feedback enigma. Academy of Management Executive, 5(1), 68-76.
20. Mills, M., & Hyle, A. E. (1999), Faculty evaluation: A prickly pair. Higher Education, 38(3), 351-371.
21. Moxley, J. M. (1992). Publish, don't perish: The scholar's guide to academic writing and publishing. Westport, CT: Praeger.
22. Nicklin, J. L. (2000). Court finds bias at Kent State U. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 47(5), A14-15.
23. Ormond, J. E. (1986). Predictors of faculty dissatisfaction with an annual performance evaluation. Journal of the College and University Personnel Association, 37(3), 13-17.
24. Pierce, B., & Garven, G. (1995). Publishing international business research: A survey of leading journals. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(1), 69-89.
25. Polonsky, M. J., & Whitelaw, P. (2006). A multi-dimensional examination of marketing journal rankings by North American academics. Marketing Education Review, 16(3), 59-72.
26. Schaffner, M., & MacKinnon, F. J. D. (2002, April 1-5). A standards-driven approach to faculty evaluation: The conflict of change. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED467600)
27. Schermerhorn, J. R., Jr., Hunt, J. G., & Osborn R.N. (2008). Organizational behavior. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
28. Seldin, P. (1984). Changing practices in faculty evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
29. Trower, C. A., Austin, A. E., & Sorcinelli, M. D. (2001). Paradise lost: How the academy converts enthusiastic recruits into early-career doubters. AAHE Bulletin, 53(9), 3-6.
30. Wilson, R. (2001). A higher bar for earning tenure: Junior faculty members find that they must publish more and publish quickly. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 47(17), A12.