Information privacy and trust in government: A citizen-based perspective from New Zealand

Journal of Information Technology and Politics

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 61-80

  Cullen, Rowena ^a   Reilly, Patrick ^a,b  

^a VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON   (New Zealand)

^b IT consultant   (United States)

Author keywords

E government; Information privacy; Trust

Indexed keywords

EID: 70249131266     PISSN: 19331681     EISSN: 1933169X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19331680801915066     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Barnes, C., & Gill, D. (2000). Declining government performance? Why citizens don't trust government. Working paper, New Zealand State Services Commission. Retrieved July 20, 2000, from http://www.ssc.govt.nz/display/document.asp?docid=4549
2. Bellman, S., Johnson, E. J., Kobrin, S. J., & Lohse, G. L. (2004). International differences in information privacy concerns: A global survey of consumers. The Information Society, 20, 313-324.
3. Bennett, C. J., & Raab, C. D. (2003). The Governance of privacy: Policy instruments in global perspective. Aldershot: Ashgate.
4. BeVier, L. R. (1995). Information about individuals in the hands of government: Some reflections on mechanisms for privacy protection. William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 4, 455-506.
5. Booz Allen Hamilton. (2005). Beyond e-Government: The world's most successful technology-enabled transformations. Commissioned by the United Kingdom Presidency of the European Council. Retrieved July 20, 2007, from http://boozallen.com/capabilities/Industries/industries_article/884216
6. Council for Excellence in Government. (2003). The new e-government equation: Ease, engagement, privacy and protection. Retrieved July 20, 2007, from http://coexgov.securesites.net/admin/FormManager/filesuploading/egovpoll2003.pdf
7. Council for Excellence in Government. (2005). A matter of trust: Americans and their government 1958-2004. Retrieved July 20, 2007, from http://coexgov.securesites.net/admin/FormManager/filesuploading/AMOT.pdf
8. Cullen, R. (2008). The New Zealand census online 2006: A case study. In H. Chen, L. Brandt, V. Gregg, R. Traunmüller, S. Dawes, E. Hovy, A. Macintosh, & C. Larson (Eds.), Digital government: Advanced research and case studies. New York: Springer.
9. Cullen, R., & Hernon, P. (2004). Wired for well-being: Citizens' response to e-government. Report to the E-Government Unit of the State Services Commission. Retrieved July 20, 2007, from http://www.e.govt.nz/resources/research/vuw-report-200406
10. Curtis, C., Vowles, J., & Curtis, B. (2004). Channel-surfing: How New Zealanders access government. Auckland UniServices. Retrieved July 20, 2007, from http://www.e.govt.nz/resources/research/channel-surfing-200409
11. Dempsey, J. X., Anderson, P., & Schwartz, A. (2003). Privacy and e-government: A report to the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs as background for the world public sector report: E-government. Center for Democracy and Technology. Retrieved July 20, 2007, from http://www.internetpolicy.net/privacy/20030523cdt.pdf
12. Dinev, T., Belloto, M., Hart, P., Colautti, C., Russo, V., & Serra, I. (2005). Internet users' privacy concerns and attitudes towards government surveillance-An exploratory study of cross-cultural differences between Italy and the United States. 18th Bled eConference: eIntegration in Action. Bled, Slovenia.
13. Dinev, T. & Hart, P. (2004). Internet privacy concerns and their antecedents-Measurement validity and a regression model. Behaviour and Information Technology, 23(6), 413-422.
14. Etzioni, A. (1999). The limits of privacy. New York: Basic Books.
15. Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H., Jr., & Howe, D. C. (2000). Trust online. Association for Computing Machinery. Communications of the ACM, 43(12) 34-40.
16. Fukuyama, F. (1996, December 2). Trust still counts in a virtual world. Forbes, 33-34.
17. Hardin, R. (2003). Trust and trustworthiness. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
18. Hu, Q., & Dinev, T. (2005). Is spyware an Internet nuisance or public menace. Communications of the ACM, 48, 8, 61-66.
19. Kent, S. T., & Millett, L. I. (2003). Who goes there? Authentication through the lens of privacy. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
20. King, M. (2003). The Penguin history of New Zealand. Auckland, New Zealand: Penguin Books.
21. Market and Opinion Research International. (2003). Privacy and data-sharing: Survey of public awareness and perceptions. Retrieved July 20, 2007, from http://www.dca.gov.uk/majrep/rights/mori-survey.pdf
22. Milberg, S. J., Smith, H. J., & Burke, S. J. (2000). "Information privacy: corporate management and national regulation." Organization Science, 11(1) 35-57.
23. Nemati, H., Tao, W., & Gold, J. (2003). Understanding tradeoffs: The link between knowledge and privacy concerns. Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute Meeting, 2003. Washington, D.C.
24. New Zealand. (2003). E-government strategy 2003. Retrieved July 20, 2007, from http://www.e.govt.nz/about-egovt/strategy/strategy-june-2003/
25. New Zealand. (2006). E-government strategy 2006. Retrieved July 20, 2007, from http://www.e.govt.nz/about-egovt/strategy
26. Parr, V., & Yamine, M. (2003). Government online, a national perspective 2003-New Zealand. Taylor Nelson Sofres. Retrieved July 20, 2007, from: http://www.e.govt.nz/resources/research/go-survey-2003
27. Prebble, M. (1990). Information, privacy and the welfare state: An integrated approach to the administration of distribution. Wellington, New Zealand: Victoria University of Wellington, Institute of Policy Studies.
28. Regan, P. (1995). Legislating privacy: Technology, social values and public policy. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
29. Reilly, P., & Cullen, R. (2006). Information privacy and trust in government: A citizen-based perspective. Wellington, New Zealand: State Services Commission. Retrieved July 7, 2007, from http://www.e.govt.nz/resources/research/trust-and-privacy
30. Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1988). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. The Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393-404.
31. Smith, H. J., Milberg, S. J., & Burke, S. J. (1996). Information privacy: Measuring individuals' concerns about organizational practices. MIS Quarterly, 20(2), 167.
32. Solove, D. J. (2005). A taxonomy of privacy. George Washington University Public Law Research Paper No. 129. Retrieved November 6, 2005, from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=667622
33. Soothill, W. E. (1968). The analects of Confucius. New York: Paragon. (Original work published 1910).
34. State Services Commission. (2005). Development goals of the State Services Commission. Goal 6. Trusted state services. Retrieved July 20, 2007, from http://www.ssc.govt.nz/display/document.asp?docid=4730&pageno=3
35. State Services Commission. (2007a). All of government authentication programme. Retrieved July 21, 2007, from http://www.www.e.govt.nz/services/authentication
36. State Services Commission. (2007b). NZ government Web standards and recommendations v1.0. Retrieved July 21, 2007, from http://www.www.e.govt.nz/standards/web-guidelines/web-standards-v1.0Statistics
37. New Zealand. (2005). Public attitudes to the confidentiality, privacy and security of official government survey data. Retrieved July 20, 2007, from http://www.stats.govt.nz/NR/rdonlyres/33F43215-2C91-4257-8964-BC4B1E6270CC/0/FinalQuantReportMay05.pdf
38. Swartz, N. (2003). Information at a price: Liberty vs. security. Information Management Journal, 37(3), 14.
39. Transparency International. (2006). Transparency international corruption perceptions index 2006. Retrieved July 20, 2007, from http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/cpi/2006
40. United Nations. (1948). Universal declaration of human rights, 1948. Retrieved July 20, 2007, from http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html
41. United Nations. (1966). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966. Retrieved July 20, 2007, from http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/a_ccpr.htm
42. Westin, A. (1967). Privacy and freedom. New York: Atheneum.