Applied research on group decision support systems: The minnesota GDSS project

Routledge Handbook of Applied Communication Research

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 558-583

  Poole, Marshall Scott ^a   DeSanctis, Gerardine ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70249123826     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203871645-35     Document Type: Chapter

References (45)

1. Armstrong, C., Perez, J., & Sambamurthy, V. (1993). Micro-level structuration behaviors in decision-making groups: The effects of alternative GDSS structures. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Information and Management Sciences, Florida State University, Tallahassee.
2. DeSanctis, G., D’Onofrio, M., Sambamurthy, V., & Poole, M. S. (1989). Comprehensiveness and restrictiveness in group decision heuristics: Effects of computer support on consensus decision-making. In J. I. DeGross, J. C. Henderson, & B. R. Konsynski (Eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth Annual International Conference on Information Systems (pp. 131-140). New York: ACM Press.
3. DeSanctis, G., & Gallupe, R. B. (1987). A foundation for the study of group decision support systems. Management Science, 33, 589-609.
4. DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5, 121-147.
5. DeSanctis, G., Poole, M. S., Desharnais, G., & Lewis, H. (1992). Using computing to facilitate the quality improvement process: The IRS-Minnesota project. Interfaces, 21(6), 23-36.
6. DeSanctis, G., Poole, M. S., Dickson, G. W., & Jackson, B. M. (1993). An interpretive analysis of team use of group technologies. Journal of Organizational Computing, 3, 1-29.
7. DeSanctis, G., Poole, M. S., Lewis, H., & Desharnais, G. (1992). Using computing in quality team meetings: Some initial observations from the IRS-Minnesota project. Journal of Management Information Systems, 8(3), 7-26.
8. DeSanctis, G., Zigurs, I., Poole, M. S., Desharnais, G., D’Onofrio, M., Gallupe, B., et al. (2008). The Minnesota GDSS projects: Group support systems, group processes, and outcomes. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9, 551-608.
9. Dickson, G. W., DeSanctis, G., Poole, M. S., & Limayem, M. (1991). Multicriteria modeling and “what if” analysis as conflict management tools for group decision making. In I. Zigurs (Ed.), DSS-91: Eleventh International Conference on Decision Support Systems (pp. 133-141). Providence, RI: Institute of Management Sciences.
10. Dickson, G. W., Lee-Partridge, J. E., Limayem, M., & DeSanctis, G. (1996). Facilitating computersupported meetings: A cumulative analysis in a multiple-criteria task environment. Group Decision and Negotiation, 5, 51-72.
11. Dickson, G. W., Lee-Partridge, J. E., & Robinson, L. H. (1993). Exploring modes of facilitative support for GDSS technology. MIS Quarterly, 17, 173-194.
12. Dickson, G., Poole, M. S., & DeSanctis, G. (1992). An overview of the Minnesota GDSS research project and the SAMM system. In R. P. Bostrom, R. T. Watson, & S. T. Kinney (Eds.), Computer augmented teamwork: A guided tour (pp. 163-179). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
13. Folger, J. P., Poole, M. S., & Stutman, R. K. (2009). Working through conflict: Strategies for relationships, groups, and organizations (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
14. Gallupe, R. B., DeSanctis, G., & Dickson, G. W. (1988). Computer-based support for group problem- finding: An experimental investigation. MIS Quarterly, 12, 277-296.
15. Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure, and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
16. Huber, G. P. (1984). Issues in the design of group decision support systems. MIS Quarterly, 8, 195-204.
17. Jackson, M. H., & Poole, M. S. (2003). Idea generation in naturally occurring contexts: Complex appropriation of a simple procedure. Human Communication Research, 29, 560-591.
18. Johansen, R. (with Charles, J., Mittman, R., & Saffo, P.). (1988). Groupware: Computer support for business teams. New York: Free Press.
19. Johansen, R., Vallee, J., & Spangler, K. (1979). Electronic meetings: Technical alternatives and social choices. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
20. Johnson, B. M., & Rice, R. E. (1987). Managing organizational innovation: The evolution from word processing to office information systems. New York: Columbia University Press.
21. Limayem, M. (2006). Human versus automated facilitation in the GSS context. DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 37, 156-166.
22. Limayem, M., Banerjee, P., & Ma, L. (2006). Impact of GDSS: Opening the black box. Decision Support Systems, 42, 945-957.
23. Limayem, M., & DeSanctis, G. (2000). Providing decisional guidance for multicriteria decision making in groups. Information Systems Research, 11, 386-401.
24. Niederman, F., & DeSanctis, G. (1995). The impact of a structured-argument approach on group problem formulation. Decision Sciences, 26, 451-474.
25. Poole, M. S. (1981). Decision development in small groups I: A comparison of two models. Communication Monographs, 48, l-23.
26. Poole, M. S. (1991). Procedures for managing meetings: Social and technological innovation. In R. A Swanson & B. O. Knapp (Eds.), Innovative meeting management (pp. 53-110). Austin, TX: 3M Meeting Management Institute.
27. Poole, M. S., & DeSanctis, G. (1990). Understanding the use of group decision support systems. In J. Fulk & C. Steinfield (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 175-195). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
28. Poole, M. S., & DeSanctis, G. (1992). Microlevel structuration in computer-supported group decision- making. Human Communication Research, 19, 5-49.
29. Poole, M. S., DeSanctis, G., Kirsch, L., & Jackson, M. (1995). Group decision support systems as facilitators of quality team efforts. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), Innovations in group facilitation: Applications in natural settings (pp. 299-322). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
30. Poole, M. S., & Holmes, M. E. (1995). Decision development in computer-assisted group decision making. Human Communication Research, 22, 90-127.
31. Poole, M. S., Holmes, M., & DeSanctis, G. (1991). Conflict management in a computer-supported meeting environment. Management Science, 37, 926-953.
32. Poole, M. S., Holmes, M., Watson, R. T., & DeSanctis, G. (1993). Group decision support systems and group communication: A comparison of decision making in computer-supported and nonsupported groups. Communication Research, 10, 176-213.
33. Poole, M. S., Lind, R., Watson, R., & DeSanctis, G. (1992). The process of using group decision support systems as a key influence on communication processes and outcomes. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Speech-Communication, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
34. Poole, M. S., & McPhee, R. D. (2005). Structuration theory. In S. May & D. K. Mumby (Eds.), Engaging organizational communication theory & research: Multiple perspectives (pp. 171-195). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35. Poole, M. S., Seibold, D. R., & McPhee, R. D. (1985). Group decision-making as a structurational process. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 71, 74-102.
36. Poole, M. S., Siebold, D. R., & McPhee, R. D. (1996). The structuration of group decisions. In R. Y. Hirokawa & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision making (2nd ed., pp. 114-146). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37. Rice, R. E. (1984). New media: Communication, research, and technology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
38. Sambamurthy, V., & DeSanctis, G. (1990). An experimental evaluation of GDSS effects on group performance during stakeholder analysis. In J. F. Nunamaker (Ed.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Vol. 3, pp. 79-89). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
39. Sambamurthy, V., DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1995). The effects of GSS structures on group decision-making on cognitive-conflict tasks. Unpublished manuscript, Information and Management Sciences Department, Florida State University, Tallahassee.
40. Sambamurthy, V., & Poole, M. S. (1992). The effects of variations in capabilities of GDSS designs on management of cognitive conflict in groups. Information Systems Research, 3, 224-251.
41. Sambamurthy, V., Poole, M. S., & Kelly, J. (1993). Effects of level of sophistication of a group decision support system on group decision-making processes. Small Group Research, 24, 523-546.
42. Vician, C., & DeSanctis, G. (2000). The impact of role training in a user-driven group support system environment. Group Decision and Negotiation, 9, 275-296.
43. Vician, C., DeSanctis, G., Poole, M. S., & Jackson, B. (1992). Using group technologies to support the design of “lights out” computing systems: A case study. In K. E. Kendall, K. Lyytinen, & J. I. DeGross (Eds.), The Impact of Computer Technologies on Information Systems Development: Proceedings of the IFIP WG 8.2 Working Conference, Minneapolis, MN, USA (pp. 151-178). Amsterdam: North Holland.
44. Watson, R. T., DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1988). Using GDSS to facilitate group consensus: Some intended and unintended consequences, MIS Quarterly, 12, 463-478.
45. Zigurs, I., Poole, M. S., & DeSanctis, G. L. (1988). A study of influence in computer-mediated group decision making. MIS Quarterly, 12, 625-644.