-
1
-
-
0042935965
-
-
10.1126/science.271.5249.618
-
E. Dagotto and T. M. Rice, Science 271, 618 (1996). 10.1126/science.271. 5249.618
-
(1996)
Science
, vol.271
, pp. 618
-
-
Dagotto, E.1
Rice, T.M.2
-
4
-
-
0033538277
-
-
10.1021/ja9818755
-
A. L. Barra, A. Caneschi, A. Cornia, F. Frabrizide Biani, D. Gatteschi, C. Sangregorio, R. Sessoli, and L. Sorace, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 5302 (1999). 10.1021/ja9818755
-
(1999)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
, vol.121
, pp. 5302
-
-
Barra, A.L.1
Caneschi, A.2
Cornia, A.3
Frabrizide Biani, F.4
Gatteschi, D.5
Sangregorio, C.6
Sessoli, R.7
Sorace, L.8
-
6
-
-
0028513233
-
-
10.1002/adma.19940060903
-
D. Gatteschi, Adv. Mater. 6, 635 (1994). 10.1002/adma.19940060903
-
(1994)
Adv. Mater.
, vol.6
, pp. 635
-
-
Gatteschi, D.1
-
7
-
-
0000205546
-
-
10.1021/cr9603946
-
A. Müller, F. Peters, M. T. Pope, and D. Gatteschi, Chem. Rev. (Washington, D.C.) 98, 239 (1998). 10.1021/cr9603946
-
(1998)
Chem. Rev. (Washington, D.C.)
, vol.98
, pp. 239
-
-
Müller, A.1
Peters, F.2
Pope, M.T.3
Gatteschi, D.4
-
8
-
-
0035972442
-
-
Polyhedron 20 (2001) (issues 11-14, pp. 1115-1784) is a complete discussion of molecular magnetism.
-
(2001)
Polyhedron
, vol.20
, Issue.11-14
, pp. 1115-1784
-
-
-
11
-
-
0347510774
-
-
10.1103/PhysRevB.68.174406
-
O. Waldmann, Phys. Rev. B 68, 174406 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.174406
-
(2003)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.68
, pp. 174406
-
-
Waldmann, O.1
-
12
-
-
33747378555
-
-
10.1103/PhysRevB.74.064408
-
D. V. Efremov and R. A. Klemm, Phys. Rev. B 74, 064408 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.064408
-
(2006)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.74
, pp. 064408
-
-
Efremov, D.V.1
Klemm, R.A.2
-
13
-
-
43549093501
-
-
10.1103/PhysRevB.77.184410
-
R. A. Klemm and D. V. Efremov, Phys. Rev. B 77, 184410 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.184410
-
(2008)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.77
, pp. 184410
-
-
Klemm, R.A.1
Efremov, D.V.2
-
14
-
-
70249111235
-
-
Without the interactions, the model has increased mixing of states which increases the overall complexity of the system. However, since the intertrimer interactions are weak the inclusion of the interactions should not have a great effect on the result.
-
Without the interactions, the model has increased mixing of states which increases the overall complexity of the system. However, since the intertrimer interactions are weak the inclusion of the interactions should not have a great effect on the result.
-
-
-
-
15
-
-
0542420242
-
-
10.1143/JPSJ.5.48
-
K. Kambe, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 5, 48 (1950). 10.1143/JPSJ.5.48
-
(1950)
J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.
, vol.5
, pp. 48
-
-
Kambe, K.1
-
16
-
-
4243407100
-
-
10.1103/PhysRevB.66.054407
-
M. Luban, F. Borsa, S. Bud'ko, P. Canfield, S. Jun, J. K. Jung, P. Kögerler, D. Mentrup, A. Müller, R. Modler, D. Procissi, B. J. Suh, and M. Torikachvili, Phys. Rev. B 66, 054407 (2002). 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.054407
-
(2002)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.66
, pp. 054407
-
-
Luban, M.1
Borsa, F.2
Bud'Ko, S.3
Canfield, P.4
Jun, S.5
Jung, J.K.6
Kögerler, P.7
Mentrup, D.8
Müller, A.9
Modler, R.10
Procissi, D.11
Suh, B.J.12
Torikachvili, M.13
-
17
-
-
0031852282
-
-
10.1002/(SICI)1521-3765(19980807)4:8<1388::AID-CHEM1388>3.0.CO;2-1
-
A. Müller, J. Meyer, H. Bögge, A. Stammler, and A. Botar, Chem.-Eur. J. 4, 1388 (1998). 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3765(19980807)4:8<1388::AID- CHEM1388>3.0.CO;2-1
-
(1998)
Chem.-Eur. J.
, vol.4
, pp. 1388
-
-
Müller, A.1
Meyer, J.2
Bögge, H.3
Stammler, A.4
Botar, A.5
-
18
-
-
70249123564
-
-
S. E. Nagler, J. Zarestky, C. Stassis, P. Kögerler, M. Luban, and A. Müller, (unpublished).
-
-
-
Nagler, S.E.1
Zarestky, J.2
Stassis, C.3
Kögerler, P.4
Luban, M.5
Müller, A.6
-
19
-
-
70249132256
-
-
For this model, we use the convention that +J is antiferromagnetic and -J is ferromagnetic.
-
For this model, we use the convention that +J is antiferromagnetic and -J is ferromagnetic.
-
-
-
-
22
-
-
70249140640
-
-
the V4+ magnetic form factor from (g=2) can be modeled by F=A ea s2 +B eb s2 +C ec s2 +D, where A=0.3106 (a=16.8160), B=0.7198 (b=7.0487), C=-0.0521 (c=0.3020), D=0.0221, and s=sinθ/λ=k/4π.
-
the V4+ magnetic form factor from (g=2) can be modeled by F=A ea s2 +B eb s2 +C ec s2 +D, where A=0.3106 (a=16.8160), B=0.7198 (b=7.0487), C=-0.0521 (c=0.3020), D=0.0221, and s=sinθ/λ=k/4π.
-
-
-
|