|
Volumn 250, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 495-496
|
Laparoscopic versus open colonic resection: Better design and results presentation are required for sufficient interpretation
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
COLON DIVERTICULOSIS;
COLON RESECTION;
COLORECTAL SURGERY;
EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA;
EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE;
HEALTH CARE SYSTEM;
HOSPITALIZATION;
HUMAN;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
LAPAROSCOPY;
LENGTH OF STAY;
LETTER;
MORBIDITY;
NASOGASTRIC TUBE;
OUTCOME ASSESSMENT;
PAIN ASSESSMENT;
POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;
ADULT;
AGED;
AGED, 80 AND OVER;
DIVERTICULITIS;
DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
LAPAROSCOPY;
LENGTH OF STAY;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS;
RESEARCH DESIGN;
SIGMOID DISEASES;
TIME FACTORS;
|
EID: 70249105782
PISSN: 00034932
EISSN: 15281140
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b49526 Document Type: Letter |
Times cited : (2)
|
References (6)
|