Stopping safely hierarchical distributed components: Application to GCM

Proceeding of the Component Based High Performance Workshop - CompFrame/HPC-GECO Workshop Series, CBHPC'08

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Henrio, Ludovic ^a   Rivera, Marcela ^a  

^a INRIA   (France)

Author keywords

Component; Distribution; Reconfiguration; Synchronisation

Indexed keywords

COMPONENT; COMPONENT ASSEMBLY; COMPONENT SYSTEMS; DISTRIBUTED COMPONENTS; DISTRIBUTION; HIERARCHICAL COMPONENT MODEL; RECONFIGURATION; SYNCHRONISATION;

HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS;

TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS;

EID: 70249105032     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1456190.1456201     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. E. Ábrahám, I. Grabe, A. Grüner, and M. Steffen. Behavioral interface description of an object-oriented languge with futures and promises. Technical Report Research Report No. 364, University Of Oslo, October 2007.
2. E. Bruneton, T. Coupaye, M. Leclercp, V. Quema, and J. Stefani. An open component model and its support in Java. In 7th Int. Symp. on Component-Based Software Engineering (CBSE-7), LNCS 3054, may 2004.
3. D. Caromel, C. Delbé, A. di Costanzo, and M. Leyton. ProActive: an integrated platform for programming and running applications on grids and P2P systems. Computational Methods in Science and Technology, 12(1):69-77, 2006.
4. D. Caromel and L. Henrio. A Theory of Distributed Objects. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., 2005.
5. D. Caromel, L. Henrio, and B. P. Serpette. Asynchronous and deterministic objects. In Proceedings of the 31st ACM SIGACT-SIGPLAN symposium on Principles of programming languages, pages 123-134. ACM Press, 2004.
6. B. Charron-Bost, F. Mattern, and G. Tel. Synchronous, asynchronous, and causally ordered communications, 1995.
7. X. Chen and M. Simons. A component framework for dynamic reconfiguration of distributed systems. In CD '02: Proceedings of the IFIP/ACM Working Conference on Component Deployment, pages 82-96, London, UK, 2002. Springer-Verlag.
8. CoreGRID, Programming Model Institute. Basic features of the grid component model (assessed), 2006. Deliverable D.PM.04, http://www.coregrid.net/ mambo/images/stories/Deliverables/d.pm.04.pdf.
9. C. Delbé. Tolérance aux pannes pour objets actifs asynchrones - protocole, modèle et expérimentations. PhD thesis, Université de Nice-Sophia Antipolis, January 2007.
10. P. N. M. R. C. D. E. Tejedor, R. Badia. Orchestrating a safe functional suspension of gem components. CoreGRID Integration Workshop 2008, Integrated Research in Grid Computing Hersonissos-Crete, Greece, April 2008.
11. E. Bruneton, T. Coupaye, and J. Stefani. The Fractal Component Model http://fractal.objectweb.org/specification/index.html. Technical report, ObjectWeb Consortium, February 2004.
12. CoCoME example implemented in GCM/ProActive. Available at http://www-sop.inria.fr/oasis/Vercors/Cocome/.
13. I. Hillman, J.; Warren. An open framework for dynamic reconfiguration. Software Engineering, 2004 ICSE 2004 Proceedings. 26th International Conference on, pages 594-603, 23-28 May 2004.
14. P. Hnětynka and T. Bureš. Advanced features of hierarchical component models. In Information Systems and Formal Methods, pages 3-10, 2007.
15. A. Ketfi, N. Belkhatir, and P.-Y. Cunin. Automatic adaptation of component-based software: Issues and experiences. In PDPTA '02: Proceedings of the International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Processing Techniques and Applications, pages 1365-1371. CSREA Press, 2002.
16. K. Krogmann and R. H. Reussner. Palladio: Prediction of performance properties. In A. Rausch, R. H. Reussner, R. Mirandola, and F. Plasil, editors, The Common Component Modeling Example: Comparing Software Component Models, number to appear in LNCS. Springer, Heidelberg, 2008. To appear.
17. H. Liu and M. Parashar. A component based programming framework for autonomie applications. In First International Conference on Autonomie Computing (ICAC'04), 2004.
18. F. Mattern. Algorithms for distributed termination detection. Distributed Computing, 2(3):161-175, June 2005.
19. A. Mukhija and M. Glinz. The casa approach to autonomie applications. In Proceedings of the 5th IEEE Workshop on Applications and Services in Wireless Networks, ASWN 2005, pages 173-182. IEEE Computer Society, 2005.
20. A. Mukhija and M. Glinz. Runtime adaptation of applications through dynamic recomposition of components. In Systems Aspects in Organic and Pervasive Computing - ARCS 2005, pages 124-138. Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, 2005.
21. J. Niehren, J. Schwinghammer, and G. Smolka. A concurrent lambda calculus with futures. Theoretical Computer Science, 364(3):338-356, Nov. 2006.
22. J. Polakovic, S. Mazaré, J.-B. Stefani, and P.-C. David. Experience with implementing safe reconfigurations in component-based embedded systems. In The 10th International ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on Component-Based Software Engineering (CBSE 2007), pages 242-257, Boston, MA, USA, 2007. Springer Berlin/Heidelberg.
23. A. Rasche and A. Poize. Configuration and dynamic reconfiguration of component-based applications with microsoft .net. In Proceedings of the Sixth IEEE International Symposium on Object-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing (ISORC'03), page 164, Washington, DC, USA, 2003. IEEE Computer Society.
24. C. Szyperski. Component software: beyond object-oriented programming. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., New York, NY, USA, 1998.