Coronary artery stenosis in high-risk patients: 64-Section CT and coronary angiography - Prospective study and analysis of discordance

Radiology

Volumn 252, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 377-385

  Gouya, Hervé ^a   Varenne, Olivier ^a   Trinquart, Ludovic ^b   Touze, Emmanuel ^a   Vignaux, Olivier ^a   Spaulding, Christian ^a   Mas, Jean Louis ^a   Sablayrolles, Jean Louis ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^b HÔPITAL EUROPÉEN GEORGES POMPIDOU   (France)

^c CENTRE CARDIOLOGIQUE DU NORD   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BETA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; GLYCERYL TRINITRATE; IODIXANOL; IOHEXOL; METOPROLOL TARTRATE; NITROQUICK; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CATHETER; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL ISCHEMIA; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 70249102780     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2522081271     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Agostoni P, Biondi-Zoccai GG, de Benedictis ML, et al. Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures: systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44(2):349-356. (Pubitemid 38950594)
2. Hoffmann MH, Shi H, Schmitz BL, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with multislice computed tomography. JAMA 2005;293(20):2471-2478. (Pubitemid 40705728)
3. Dewey M, Laule M, Krug L, et al. Multisegment and halfscan reconstruction of 16-slice computed tomography for detection of coronary artery stenoses. Invest Radiol 2004;39(4):223-229. (Pubitemid 38391787)
4. Hamon M, Biondi-Zoccai GG, Malagutti P, et al. Diagnostic performance of multislice spiral computed tomography of coronary arteries as compared with conventional invasive coronary angiography: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48(9):1896-1910. (Pubitemid 44755022)
5. Dewey M, Teige F, Schnapauff D, et al. Noninvasive detection of coronary artery stenoses with multislice computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Intern Med 2006;145(6):407-415. (Pubitemid 46768571)
6. Vanhoenacker PK, Heijenbrok-Kal MH, Van Heste R, et al. Diagnostic performance of multidetector CT angiography for assessment of coronary artery disease: meta-analysis. Radiology 2007;244(2):419-428. (Pubitemid 47080873)
7. Hamon M, Morello R, Riddell JW, Hamon M. Coronary arteries: diagnostic performance of 16- versus 64-section spiral CT compared with invasive coronary angiography - meta-analysis. Radiology 2007;245(3):720-731. (Pubitemid 350127342)
8. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 1975;51(suppl 4):5-40.
9. Dewey M, Schnapauff D, Laule M, et al. Multislice CT coronary angiography: evaluation of an automatic vessel detection tool. Rofo 2004;176(4):478-483.
10. Simel DL, Feussner JR, DeLong ER, Matchar DB. Intermediate, indeterminate, and uninterpretable diagnostic test results. Med Decis Making 1987;7(2):107-114.
11. Wilson EB. Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference. J Am Stat Assoc 1927;22:209-212.
12. Nam JM. Confidence limits for the ratio of two binomial proportions based on likelihood scores: non-iterative method. Biometrical J 2007;37(3):375-379.
13. Rao JN, Scott AJ. A simple method for the analysis of clustered binary data. Biometrics 1992;48(2):577-585.
14. Carpenter J, Bithell J. Bootstrap confidence intervals: when, which, what? a practical guide for medical statisticians. Stat Med 2000;19(9):1141- 1164. (Pubitemid 30265928)
15. Bland JM, Altman DG. Agreement between methods of measurement with multiple observations per individual. J Biopharm Stat 2007;17(4):571-582.
16. Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Shaw LJ, et al. Meta-analysis of comparative diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and multislice computed tomography for noninvasive coronary angiography. Am Heart J 2006;151(2):404-411. (Pubitemid 43144743)
17. Ropers D, Baum U, Pohle K, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin-slice multi-detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction. Circulation 2003;107(5):664-666. (Pubitemid 36222588)
18. Stein PD, Beemath A, Kayali F, Skaf E, Sanchez J, Olson RE. Multidetector computed tomography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a systematic review. Am J Med 2006;119(3):203-216. (Pubitemid 43255058)
19. Herzog C, Arning-Erb M, Zangos S, et al. Multi-detector row CT coronary angiography: influence of reconstruction technique and heart rate on image quality. Radiology 2006;238(1):75-86. (Pubitemid 43010582)
20. Herzog C, Zwerner PL, Doll JR, et al. Significant coronary artery stenosis: comparison on per-patient and per-vessel or per-segment basis at 64-section CT angiography. Radiology 2007;244(1):112-120. (Pubitemid 46981964)
21. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, Goldstein JA. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46(3):552-557. (Pubitemid 41040301)
22. Nieman K, Cademartiri F, Lemos PA, Raaijmakers R, Pattynama PM, de Feyter PJ. Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 2002;106(16):2051-2054. (Pubitemid 35192809)
23. Nieman K, Rensing BJ, van Geuns RJ, et al. Usefulness of multislice computed tomography for detecting obstructive coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 2002;89(8):913-918. (Pubitemid 34310286)
24. Dewey M, Rutsch W, Schnapauff D, Teige F, Hamm B. Coronary artery stenosis quantification using multislice computed tomography. Invest Radiol 2007;42(2):78-84. (Pubitemid 46104887)
25. Cury RC, Ferencik M, Achenbach S, et al. Accuracy of 16-slice multi-detector CT to quantify the degree of coronary artery stenosis: assessment of cross-sectional and longitudinal vessel reconstructions. Eur J Radiol 2006;57(3):345-350. (Pubitemid 43254913)
26. Husmann L, Gaemperli O, Schepis T, et al. Accuracy of quantitative coronary angiography with computed tomography and its dependency on plaque composition: plaque composition and accuracy of cardiac CT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2008;24(8):895-904.
27. Betsou S, Efstathopoulos EP, Katritsis D, Faulkner K, Panayiotakis G. Patient radiation doses during cardiac catheterization procedures. Br J Radiol 1998;71(846):634-639. (Pubitemid 28271822)