A distance-independent basal area growth model for oriental spruce (Picea orientalis (l.) Link) growing in mixture with oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) in the Artvin region, North-East Turkey

African Journal of Agricultural Research

Volumn 4, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 740-751

  Sonmez T ^a   Ercanli, I ^b   Kele, S ^c  

^a ARTVIN CORUH UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b KARADENIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c CANKIRI KARATEKIN UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Individual tree basal area growth model; Mixed species stands; Oriental beech; Oriental spruce

Indexed keywords

FAGUS; FAGUS ORIENTALIS; PICEA; PICEA ORIENTALIS;

EID: 70249098502     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1991637X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Akalp T (1978). Türkiye'deki Doǧu ladini (Picea orieantalis (L.) link) ormanlari{dotless}nda hasi{dotless}lat ara ti{dotless}rmalari{dotless}, [Yield research of Picea orientalis L. forest in Turkey (PhD Thesis), the Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Istanbul of University, Istanbul, Turkey. (In Turkish.)
2. Akalp T (1983). Deǧişik Yaşli{dotless} Me cerelerde Arti{dotless}m ve Büyümenin Simulasyonu. [Simulation of Growth and Yield in Uneven-aged Oriental Spruce Stands]. Istanbul University, Forestry Faculty Publication, No: 327, Istanbul (in Turkish).
3. Andreassen K, Tomter SM (2003). Basal area growth models for individual trees of Norway spruce, Scots pine, birch and other broadleaves in Norway. For. Ecol. Manage., 180, 11-24.
4. Anglestam PK (1998). Maintaining and restoring biodiversity in European boreal forests by developing natural disturbance regimes. J. Veg. Sci. 9: 593-602.
5. Atalay I (1984). Regioning of the seed transfer of Oriental Spruce (Picea orientalis (L.) Link) in Turkey, Forest General Directorate, Forest Tree Seeds and Breeding Research Directorate, Publication No. 2, Ankara, 67 p.
6. Atici E (1998). Deǧişikyaşli{dotless} doǧu Kayi{dotless}ni{dotless} (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) ormanlari{dotless}nda arti{dotless}m ve büyüme [Growth and Yield in Uneven-aged Oriental Beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) Stands], PhD Thesis, The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Istanbul of University, Istanbul, Turkey (In Turkish).
7. Bella IE (1971). A new competition model for individual trees. For. Sci. 17, 364-372.
8. Biging GS, Dobbertin M (1992). A comparison of distance dependent competition measures for height and basal area growth on individual conifer trees. For. Sci. 38 (3), 695-720.
9. Binkley D, Dunkin KA, DeBell D, Ryan MG (1992). Production and nutrient cycling in mixed plantations of Eucalyptus and Albizia in Hawaii. For. Sci. 38, 393-408.
10. Burkhart H (1995). Modeling Forest Growth, Encyclopedia of Environmental Biology, Volume 2, 535-543
11. Carus S (1998). Ayi{dotless}ni{dotless} yaşli{dotless} Doǧu Kayi{dotless}ni{dotless} (Fagus orientalis Lipsly.) ormanlari{dotless}nda arti{dotless}m ve büyüme [Growth and Yield in Evenaged Oriental Beech Stands], PhD Thesis, The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Istanbul of University, Istanbul, Turkey (in Turkish).
12. Çepel N, Dündar M, Günel A (1977). Türkiyenin önemli yetişme bölgelerinde Saf Sari{dotless}çam ormanlari{dotless}ni{dotless}n geli imi ile bazi{dotless} edafik ve fizyografik etkenler arsi{dotless}ndaki ilişkiler, [Relationship between edafic and phiological attributes and growth of Scotch pine in important forest areas], Tubitak No. 354, Ankara (in Turkish).
13. Cole DM, Stage AR (1972). Estimating future diameters of lodgepole pine. USDA Forest Service Research Paper, Int-131, 20 p.
14. Daşdemir I(1992). Türkiyedeki Doǧu ladini (Picea orientalis (L.) Link) ormanlari{dotless}nda yetişme faktörleri verimlilik ilişkleri, [Relationship between productivity and site factors for oriental spruce in TURKEY], Turkey Forest Research Organization Publication No: 64, Ankara. (In Turkish.)
15. Davis PH (1982). Flora of Turkey and The East Aegean Islands. Vol. I-IX Edinburgh Univ. Press, Edinburgh, England.
16. DeBell DS, Whitesell CD, Schubert TH (1985). Mixed plantations of Eucalyptus and leguminous trees enhance biomass production. USDA Forest Service Research Paper, PSW-175, 6 p.
17. Ercanli I (2003). Artvin orman işletme şefliǧi si{dotless}ni{dotless}rlari{dotless} içerisindeki Doǧu Ladini (Picea orientalis (l.) Link.) meşçerelerinde si{dotless}kli{dotless}ǧa baǧli{dotless} hasi{dotless}lat tablosunun düzenlenmesi [The Constructing of aA Variable Density Yield Table for Oriental Spruce Stands n: Artvin Central State Forest Enterprise], MD Thesis, The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey (IN Turkish).
18. Elmer M, France ML, Förster G, Roth M (2004). Changes in the decomposer community when converting spruce monocultures to mixed spruce/beech stands, Plant Soil, 264, 97-109.
19. Eruz E (1984). Bali{dotless}kesir Orman Başmüdürlüǧü bölgesindeki saf Karaçam meşçerelerinin boy gelişimi ile bazi{dotless} edafik ve fizyografik faktörler arasi{dotless}ndaki ilişkiler, [Relationship between height growth and some edaphic and phiological attributes for Crimean pine in Balikesir forest Enterprise], İstanbul University Publication No: 3244, İstanbul (in Turkish).
20. FAO (1995). Plantations in tropical and subtropical regions-mixed and pure. FAO of the UN, Rome, Italy, 27 p.
21. Gadow KV, Hui GY (1999). Modelling forest development, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrect, 213 p.
22. Günlü A (2003). Artvin-Genya Daǧi{dotless} Orman Yetişme Ortami{dotless} Birimlerinin Ayri{dotless}lmasi{dotless} ve Haritalanmasi{dotless} Üzerine Araşti{dotless}rmalar [The role of site factors in distinguishing forest sites in Artvin-Genya Mountain], MD Thesis, The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey (in Turkish).
23. Hynynen J, Burkhart HE, Allen HL (1998). Modeling tree growth in fertilized midrotation loblolly pine plantations. For. Ecol. Manage, 107, 213-229.
24. Huuskonen S, Miina J (2007). Stand-level growth models for young Scots pine stands in Finland. For. Ecol. Manage. 241, 49-61
25. Johnson EW (1973). Relationship between point density measurements and subsequent growth of southern pines, Agricultural, Exprience Statistics, Auburn University, AL, Bulletin. 447, 109 p.
26. Jõgiste K (2000). A basal area increment model for Norway Spruce in mixed stands in Estonia. Scand. J. For. Res. 15, 97-102.
27. Kalipsiz A (1962). Deǧişikyaşli{dotless} Doǧu Kayi{dotless}ni{dotless}nda Arti{dotless}m ve Büyüme Araşti{dotless}rmalari{dotless} [Growth and Yield Studies in Uneven-aged Oriental Beech Stands]. Turkey Forestry Organization, No: 339/7, Ankara. (in Turkish).
28. Kangur A, Sims A, Jogiste K, Kiviste A, Korjus, H, Gadow KV (2007). Comparative modeling of stand development in Scots pine dominated forests in Estonia. For. Ecol. Manage. 250, 109-118
29. Kaye JP, Resh SC, Kaye MW, Chimmer RA (2000). Nutrient and carbon dynamics in a replacement series of Eucalyptus and Albizia trees. Ecology 81, 3267-3273.
30. Kennel R (1965). Untersuchungen über die Leistung von Fichte und Buche im Reinund Mischbestand. Allg. Forst. Jagdzeitung, 136 (8), 149-160.
31. Konukcu M (2001). Forests and Turkish Forestry, Turkey Goverment Planning Organization, No: 2630, Ankara, Turkey
32. Köse S, Yavuz H, Misir M, Misir N (2001). KTÜ Orman Fakültesi Ara ti{dotless}rma Ormani{dotless} Ladin Meşçerelerinin Hasi{dotless}lat Esaslari{dotless} Sonuç Raporu [Yield principals for oriental spruce in research forest of KTU forest faculty], K.T.Ü. Resarch Found Headship Conclusion Report, 110 p.
33. Lee WK, Gadow KV, Chung DJ, Lee JL, Shin MY (2004). DBH growth model for Pinus densiflora and Quercus variabilis mixed forests in central Korea. For. Ecol. Manage. 176, 187-200.
34. Mabvurira D, Miina J (2002). Individual-tree growth and mortality models for Eucalyptus grandis (Hill) Maiden plantations in Zimbabwe. For. Ecol. Manage. 161, 231-245.
35. Montagnini F (2000). Accumulation in above-ground biomass and soil storage of mineral nutrients in pure and mixed plantations in humid tropical lowland. For. Ecol. Manage. 134, 257-270.
36. Myers R (1986). Classical and Modem Regression with Applications. Duxbury-press, Boston, Massachusetts, 359 p.
37. Nystörm K, Kexi M (1997). Individual tree basal area growth models for young stands of Norway spruce in Sweden. For. Ecol. Manage. 97, 173-185
38. Parrotta JA (1999). Productivity, nutrient cycling, and succession in single-and mixed-species plantations of Casuarina equisetifolia, Eucalyptus robusta, and Leucaena leucocephala in Puerto Rico. For. Ecol. Manage. 124, 45-77.
39. Peng C (2000). Understanding the role of Forest Simulation Models in Sustainable Forest Management. Environ. Impact Asses. 481-501.
40. Porté, Bartelink (2002). Modelling mixed forest growth: a review of models for forest management, Ecol. Model. 150, 141-188.
41. Pretzsch H (1999). Modelling growth in pure and mixed stands: a historical overview, Management of Mixed-species Forest: Silviculture and Economics. DLO Institute for Forestry and Nature Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands. IBN Sci. Contrib. 15, 102-107.
42. Resh SC, Binkley D, Parrotta JA (2002). Greater soil carbon sequestration under nitrogen-fixing trees compared with Eucalyptus species, Ecosystems, 5, 217-231.
43. Rothe A (1997). Einfluss des Baumartenanteils auf Durchwurzelung, asserhaushalt, Stoffhaushalt und Zuwachsleistung eines Fichten-Buchen-Mischbestandes am Standort Höglwald. Forstliche Foschungsberichte München, 163 p.
44. Rothe A, Kreutzer K (1998). Wechselwirkungen zwischen Fichte und Buche im Mischbestand. Allg. Forstzeitschr, 784-787.
45. Rothe A, Kreutzer K, Küchenhoff H (2002). Influence of tree species composition on soil and soil solution properties in two mixed sprucebeech stands with contrasting history in Southern Germany, Plant Soil. 240: 47-56.
46. Saatcioglu F (1976). Silvikültür I, University of Istanbul, Faculty of Forestry, Publication No. 2187/22, 175-182.
47. Salwasser H (1994). Ecosystem management: Can it sustain diversity and productivity? J. For. 92(8): 7-10.
48. Sariyildiz T, Tüfekcioǧlu A, Kücük M (2005). Comparison of Decomposition Rates of Beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) and Spruce (Picea orientalis (L.) Link) Litter in Pure and Mixed Stands of Both Species in Artvin, Turkey, Turkish J. Agric. For. 29, 429-438.
49. Schröder J, Soalleiro RR, Alonso GV (2002). An age-independent basal area increment model for maritime pine trees in Northwestern Spain. For. Ecol. Manage. 157, 55-64.
50. Shapiro SS, Wilk MB (1965). An analysis of variance test normality (Complete samples), Biometrica, 52(3), 591-611.
51. Sterba H, Blab A, Katzensteiner K (2002). Adapting an individual tree growth model for Norway Spruce (Picea abies L. Karst.) in pure and mixed species stands. For. Ecol. Manage. 159, 101-110.
52. Sterba H, Condes S (2008). Comparing an individual tree growth model for Pinus halepensis Mill. In: the Spanish region of Murcia with yield tables gained from the same area, Eur. J For. Res. 127 (3), 253-261
53. SPSS Institute Inc. (2004). SPSS Base 12.0 User's Guide, 356 p.
54. Trasobares T, Pukkala T (2004). Using past growth to improve individual-tree diameter growth models for uneven-aged mixtures of Pinus sylvestris L. and Pinus nigra Arn. In Catalonia, north-east Spain, Ann. For. Sci. 61, 409-417.
55. Van Winden AP (2001). Above-ground interactions and productivity in mixed-species plantations of Acacia mearnsii and Eucalyptus globules, the Australian National University, Canberra, 59 p.
56. Vanclay JK (1994). Modelling forest growth-applications to mixed tropical forests. CAB International, Department of Economics and Natural Resource, Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen, Denmark, Wallingford, UK, 312 pp.
57. Wang GG (1998). Is height of dominant trees at a reference diameter an adequate measure of site quality? For. Ecol. Manage. 112, 49-54.
58. West PW (1980). Use of diameter increment and basal area increment in tree growth studies, Can. J. For. Res. 10, 71-77.
59. White H (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity, Econometrica, 48 (4), 817-838.
60. Wykoff WR (1982). User's guide to the stand prognosis model. USDA Forest Service General Techinical. Report, INT-133.
61. Wykoff WR (1990). A basal area increment model for individual conifers in northern Rocky Mountains. For. Sci. 36 (4), 1077-1104
62. Zhao D, Borders B, Wilson M (2004). Individual-tree diameter growth and mortality models for bottomland mixed-species hardwood stands in the lower Mississippi alluvial valley. For. Ecol. Manage. 199, 307-322.