Ground state of a tightly bound composite dimer immersed in a Fermi sea

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 80, Issue 3, 2009, Pages

  Mora, Christophe ^a   Chevy, Frédéric ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^b LABORATOIRE KASTLER BROSSEL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOUND STATE; FERMI SEA; GROUND-STATE ENERGIES; HOLE PAIRS; SCATTERING LENGTH; THEORETICAL INVESTIGATIONS; TWO PARTICLES; TWO-CHANNEL MODEL;

GROUND STATE;

FERMIONS;

EID: 70249096602     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.80.033607     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. J. Bardeen, L. N. Cooper, and J. R. Schrieffer, Phys. Rev. 108, 1175 (1957). 10.1103/PhysRev.108.1175
2. A. Clogston, Phys. Rev. Lett. 9, 266 (1962). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.9.266
3. B. S. Chandrasekhar, Appl. Phys. Lett. 1, 7 (1962). 10.1063/1.1777362
4. P. Fulde and R. Ferrell, Phys. Rev. 135, A550 (1964). 10.1103/PhysRev.135.A550
5. J. Larkin and Y. Ovshinikov, Sov. Phys. JETP 20, 762 (1965).
6. Y. Matsuda and H. Shimahara, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 76, 051005 (2007). 10.1143/JPSJ.76.051005
7. G. Partridge, W. Li, R. Kamar, Y. Liao, and R. Hulet, Science 311, 503 (2006). 10.1126/science.1122876
8. M. Zwierlein, A. Schirotzek, C. Schunck, and W. Ketterle, Science 311, 492 (2006). 10.1126/science.1122318
9. S. Pilati and S. Giorgini, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 030401 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.030401
10. A. Bulgac and M. McNeil Forbes, Phys. Rev. A 75, 031605 (R) (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevA.75.031605
11. F. Chevy, Phys. Rev. A 74, 063628 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevA.74.063628
12. R. Combescot, A. Recati, C. Lobo, and F. Chevy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 180402 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.180402
13. R. Combescot and S. Giraud, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 050404 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.050404
14. C. Lobo, A. Recati, S. Giorgini, and S. Stringari, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 200403 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.200403
15. N. Prokof'ev and B. Svistunov, Phys. Rev. B 77, 020408 (R) (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.020408
16. D. S. Petrov, Phys. Rev. A 67, 010703 (R) (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevA.67. 010703
17. G. Skorniakov and K. Ter-Martirosian, Sov. Phys. JETP 4, 648 (1957).
18. P. Pieri and G. C. Strinati, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 150404 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.150404
19. R. Combescot, S. Giraud, and X. Leyronas, e-print arXiv:0907.3197.
20. M. Jona-Lasinio, L. Pricoupenko, and Y. Castin, Phys. Rev. A 77, 043611 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevA.77.043611
21. A. O. Gogolin, C. Mora, and R. Egger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 140404 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.140404
22. Note that the energy origin is chosen so that l FS □ has zero energy and this convention differs by EF from that used in.
23. L. Viverit and S. Giorgini, Phys. Rev. A 66, 063604 (2002). 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.063604
24. This Ansatz is actually formally identical to the textbook Cooper Ansatz used to interpret intuitively the key role of the Fermi sea in Cooper pairing in superconductors.
25. S. Nascimbène, N. Navon, K. Jiang, L. Tarruell, M. Teichmann, J. McKeever, F. Chevy, and C. Salomon, e-print arXiv:0907.3032.
26. A. Schirotzek, C.-H. Wu, A. Sommer, and M. W. Zwierlein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 230402 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.230402
27. P. Massignan, G. M. Bruun, and H. T. C. Stoof, Phys. Rev. A 78, 031602 (R) (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.031602