Two-center evaluation of dynamic sentinel node biopsy for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Volumn 27, Issue 20, 2009, Pages 3325-3329

  Leijte, Joost A P ^a   Hughes, Ben ^a   Graafland, Niels M ^a   Kroon, Bin K ^a   Valdés Olmos, Renato A ^a   Nieweg, Omgo E ^a   Corbishley, Cathy ^a   Heenan, Sue ^a   Watkin, Nick ^a   Horenblas, Simon ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASPIRATION BIOPSY; ASPIRATION CYTOLOGY; COMPLICATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHOGRAPHY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INGUINAL LYMPH NODE; INGUINAL REGION; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORBIDITY; PENIS CARCINOMA; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; TUMOR RECURRENCE; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL TRIAL; FOLLOW UP; INFECTION; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATHOLOGY; PENIS TUMOR; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SEROMA;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INFECTION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; PENILE NEOPLASMS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY; SEROMA;

EID: 70249094679     PISSN: 0732183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.6870     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Solsona E, Algaba F, Horenblas S, et al: EAU Guidelines on Penile Cancer. Eur Urol 46:1-8, 2004
2. McDougal WS: Carcinoma of the penis: Improved survival by early regional lymphadenectomy based on the histological grade and depth of invasion of the primary lesion. J Urol 154:1364-1366, 1995
3. Kroon BK, Horenblas S, Lont AP, et al: Patients with penile carcinoma benefit from immediate resection of clinically occult lymph node metastases. J Urol 173:816-819, 2005
4. Bevan-Thomas R, Slaton JW, Pettaway CA: Contemporary morbidity from lymphadenectomy for penile squamous cell carcinoma: The M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. J Urol 167:1638-1642, 2002
5. Nelson BA, Cookson MS, Smith JA Jr, et al: Complications of inguinal and pelvic lymphadenectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: A contemporary series. J Urol 172:494-497, 2004
6. Hegarty PK, Kayes O, Freeman A, et al: A prospective study of 100 cases of penile cancer managed according to European Association of Urology guidelines. BJU Int 98:526-531, 2006
7. Horenblas S, van Tinteren H, Delemarre JF, et al: Squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: Accuracy of tumor, nodes and metastasis classification system, and role of lymphangiography, computerized tomography scan and fine needle aspiration cytology. J Urol 146:1279-1283, 1991
8. Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Viale G, et al: A randomized comparison of sentinel-node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 349:546-553, 2003
9. Morton DL, Thompson JF, Cochran AJ, et al: Sentinel-node biopsy or nodal observation in melanoma. N Engl J Med 355:1307-1317, 2006
10. Cabanas RM: An approach for the treatment of penile carcinoma. Cancer 39:456-466, 1977
11. Perdonà S, Autorino R, Gallo L, et al: Role of dynamic sentinel node biopsy in penile cancer: Our experience. J Surg Oncol 93:181-185, 2006
12. Leijte JA, Kroon BK, Valdes Olmos RA, et al: Reliability and safety of current dynamic sentinel node biopsy for penile carcinoma. Eur Urol 52:170-177, 2007
13. Horenblas S, Jansen L, Meinhardt W, et al: Detection of occult metastasis in squamous cell carcinoma of the penis using a dynamic sentinel node procedure. J Urol 163:100-104, 2000
14. Ficarra V, Galfano A: Should the dynamic sentinel node biopsy (DSNB) be considered the gold standard in the evaluation of lymph node status in patients with penile carcinoma? Eur Urol 52:17-19, 2007; discussion 20-21
15. Lont AP, Gallee MP, Meinhardt W, et al: Penis conserving treatment for T1 and T2 penile carcinoma: Clinical implications of a local recurrence. J Urol 176:575-580, 2006; discussion 580
16. Hegarty PK, Shabbir M, Hughes B, et al: Penile preserving surgery and surgical strategies to maximize penile form and function in penile cancer: Recommendations from the United Kingdom experience. World J Urol 27:179-187, 2009
17. Sobin LH, Wittekind CH: TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours (ed 6). Wiley-Liss, New York, NY, 2002
18. Broders AC: Squamous cell epithelioma of the skin: A study of 256 cases. Ann Surg 73:141-160, 1921
19. Tanis PJ, Lont AP, Meinhardt W, et al: Dynamic sentinel node biopsy for penile cancer: Reliability of a staging technique. J Urol 168:76-80, 2002
20. Kroon BK, Horenblas S, Estourgie SH, et al: How to avoid false-negative dynamic sentinel node procedures in penile carcinoma. J Urol 171:2191-2194, 2004
21. Lont AP, Kroon BK, Gallee MP, et al: Pelvic lymph node dissection for penile carcinoma: Extent of inguinal lymph node involvement as an indicator for pelvic lymph node involvement and survival. J Urol 177:947-952, 2007; discussion 952
22. Hadway P, Smith Y, Corbishley C, et al: Evaluation of dynamic lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel lymph-node biopsy for detecting occult metastases in patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma. BJU Int 100:561-565, 2007
23. Gonzaga-Silva LF, Tavares JM, Freitas FC, et al: The isolated gamma probe technique for sentinel node penile carcinoma detection is unreliable. Int Braz J Urol 33:58-63, 2007; discussion 64-67
24. Hernández-Toris N, Quintero-Becerra J, Gallegos-Hernandez JF, et al: Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in penis cancer. Feasibility study and preliminary report [in Spanish]. Cir Cir 75:87-91, 2007
25. Spiess PE, Izawa JI, Bassett R, et al: Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and dynamic sentinel node biopsy for staging penile cancer: Results with pathological correlation. J Urol 177:2157-2161, 2007
26. Hegarty PK, Minhas S: Re: Evaluation of dynamic lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel lymph-node biopsy for detecting occult metastases in patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma. BJU Int 101: 781, 2008; author reply 781-782
27. Horenblas S: Words of wisdom. Re: Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and dynamic sentinel node biopsy for staging penile cancer: Results with pathological correlation. Eur Urol 52:1261, 2007
28. Horenblas S: Editorial comment on: The isolated gamma probe technique for sentinel node penile carcinoma detection is unreliable. Int Braz J Urol 33:58-63; discussion 64-67
29. Morton DL, Cochran AJ, Thompson JF, et al: Sentinel node biopsy for early-stage melanoma: Accuracy and morbidity in MSLT-I, an international multicenter trial. Ann Surg 242:302-311, 2005; discussion 311-313
30. Clarke D, Newcombe RG, Mansel RE: The learning curve in sentinel node biopsy: The ALMANAC experience. Ann Surg Oncol 11:211S-215S, 2004
31. Tanis PJ, Nieweg OE, Hart AA, et al: The illusion of the learning phase for lymphatic mapping. Ann Surg Oncol 9:142-147, 2002
32. Van der Zee AG, Oonk MH, De Hullu JA, et al: Sentinel node dissection is safe in the treatment of early-stage vulvar cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:884-889, 2008