The Social Utility of Informal Institutions: Caucuses as Networks in the 110th U.S. House of Representatives

American Politics Research

Volumn 37, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 742-766

  Victor, Jennifer Nicoll ^a   Ringe, Nils ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Caucuses; Legislative institutions; Legislative organization; Social networks; U.S. Congress

Indexed keywords

EID: 70249092169     PISSN: 1532673X     EISSN: 15523373     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1532673X09337183     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Ainsworth, S. H., & Akins, F. (1997). The informational role of caucuses in the U.S. Congress. American Politics Research, 25, 407-430.
2. Bonacich, P. (1972). Factoring and weighing approaches to clique identification. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2, 113-120.
3. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet 6 for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Lexington, KY: Analytic Technologies.
4. Bratton, K., & Haynie, K. (1999). Agenda setting and legislative success in state legislatures: The effects of race and gender. Journal of Politics, 61(August), 658-679.
5. Burkett, T., & Skvoretz, J. (2001). Political support networks among U.S. senators: Stability and change from 1973-1990. Unpublished manuscript, College of Charleston, South Carolina. Retrieved May 29, 2008, from http://web1.cas.usf.edu/MAIN/include/0-1201-000/polsupportnet.pdf
6. Carpenter, D. P., Esterling, K. M., & Lazer, D. M. J. (2004). Friends, brokers, and transitivity: Who informs whom in Washington politics? Journal of Politics, 66, 224-246.
7. Congressional Yellow Book. (2008, Winter). Vol. 33, No. 4. New York: Leadership Directories.
8. Crisp, B., Kanthak, K., & Leijonhufvud, J. (2004). The reputations legislators build: With whom should representatives collaborate? American Political Science Review, 98, 703-716.
9. Esterling, K. (2007). Buying expertise: Campaign contributions and attention to policy analysis in Congressional committees. American Political Science Review, 101, 93-109.
10. Fiellin, A. (1962). The functions of informal groups in legislative institutions. Journal of Politics, 24, 72-91.
11. Fowler, J. H. (2006). Connecting the Congress: A study of cosponsorship networks. Political Analysis, 14, 456-487.
12. Gimpel, J., Lee, F. E., & Pearson-Werkowitz, S. (2008). The check is in the mail: Interdistrict funding flows in Congressional elections. American Journal of Political Science, 52, 373-394.
13. Gross, J. H., & Shalizi, C. (2007). Cosponsorship in the U.S. Senate: A multilevel approach to detecting the subtle influence of social relational factors on legislative behavior (Unpublished working paper). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University.
14. Hammond, S. W. (1991). Congressional caucuses and party leaders in the house of representatives. Political Science Quarterly, 106, 277-294.
15. Hammond, S. W. (1998). Congressional caucuses in national policy making. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
16. Hammond, S. W., Mulhollan, D. P., & Stevens, Jr, A. G. (1983). Congressional caucuses: Legislators as Lobbyists. In A. Cigler & B. A. Loomis (Eds.), Interest group politics (pp. 275-297). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
17. Hammond, S. W., Mulhollan, D. P., & Stevens, Jr, A. G. (1985). Informal Congressional caucuses and agenda setting. Western Political Quarterly, 38, 583-605.
18. Hanneman, R. A., & Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to social network methods. Riverside: University of California. Retrieved June 21, 2009, from http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/
19. Hawkesworth, M. (2003). Congressional enactments of race-gender: Toward a theory of raced-gendered institutions. American Political Science Review, 97, 529-550.
20. King, G., Tomz, M., & Wittenberg, J. (2000). Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 347-361.
21. Knoke, D. (1990). Political networks: The structural perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22. Koger, G., Masket, S., & Noel, H. (2009). Partisan webs: Information exchange and party networks. British Journal of Political Science, 39, 633-653.
23. Loomis, B. A. (1981). Congressional caucuses and the politics of representation. In L. C. Dodd & B. I. Oppenheimer (Eds.), Congress revisited (2nd ed., pp. 204-220). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
24. Mansfield, J. W. (2008, January 16). Political networks: The structural perspective. Nonpublic report obtained by way of favor to the authors.
25. McGlen, N. E., & O'Connor, K. (1998). Women, politics, and American society. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
26. Miller, C. M. (1990). Agenda-setting by state legislative Black caucuses: Policy priorities and factors of success. Policy Studies Review, 9, 339-354.
27. Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (2004, July). DW-NOMINATE scores with bootstrapped standard errors. Retrieved May 19, 2008, from http://www.voteview.com
28. Porter, M., Mucha, P. J., Newman, M. E. J., & Warmbran, C. M. (2005). A network analysis of committees in the U.S. House of Representatives. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 120, 7057-7062.
29. Proctor, C. H., & Loomis, C. P. (1951). Analysis of sociometric data. In P. W. Holland & S. Leinhardt (Eds.), Research methods in social relations (pp. 561-586). New York: Dryden Press.
30. Rosenthal, C. S. (2002). Women transforming Congress. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
31. Scott, J. (2000). Social network analysis: A handbook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32. Smooth, W. (2001). African American women state legislators: The impact of gender and race on legislative influence. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, Baltimore.
33. Stevens, A. G., Jr., Miller, A. H., & Mann, T. E. (1974). Mobilization of liberal strength in the house, 1955-1970: The democratic study group. American Political Science Review, 68, 667-681.
34. Stevens, A. G., Jr., Mullhollan, D. P., & Rundquist, P. S. (1981). U. S. Congressional structure and representation: The role of informal groups. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 4, 415-437.
35. Swers, M. (2002). The difference women make: The policy impact of women in Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36. Tomz, M., Wittenberg, J., & King, G. (2001). CLARIFY: Software for interpreting and presenting statistical results Version 2.0. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. Retrieved June 21, 2009, from http://gking.harvard.edu
37. Vega, A. (1993). Congressional informal groups as representative responsiveness. American Review of Politics, 14, 355-373.
38. Volden, C., & Wiseman, A. E. (2007, August 30-September 2). Legislative effectiveness in Congress. Paper presented at the 2007 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
39. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
40. Whiteman, D. (1995). Communication in Congress: Members, staff, and the search for information. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.