Improved fluorescence peak integration in the Tekran 2537 for applications with sub-optimal sample loadings

Atmospheric Environment

Volumn 43, Issue 22-23, 2009, Pages 3648-3651

  Swartzendruber, P C ^a,b   Jaffe, D A ^a,b   Finley, B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON BOTHELL   (United States)

Author keywords

CVAFS; Integration; Mercury; Methods

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY AND PRECISION; ATMOSPHERIC MERCURY; ATOMIC FLUORESCENCE; CVAFS; DETECTION LIMITS; FLUORESCENCE PEAK; HIGH-TIME RESOLUTION; MASS LOADINGS; MERCURY; METHODS; NON-LINEAR; NON-LINEARITY; OFF-LINE METHODS; OFFLINE; OPTIMAL SAMPLES; PEAK INTEGRATION; SAMPLE VOLUME;

AIRCRAFT; DATA PROCESSING; FLUORESCENCE; INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH; LOADING; MERCURY (METAL); SPECTROMETRY;

INTEGRATION;

MERCURY;

DETECTION METHOD; FLUORESCENCE; MERCURY (ELEMENT); METHODOLOGY; NONLINEARITY;

AIR MONITORING; AIR QUALITY; ARTICLE; AUTOANALYZER; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;

EID: 70249091435     PISSN: 13522310     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.02.063     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Banic C.M., Beauchamp S.T., Tordon R.J., Schroeder W.H., Steffen A., Anlauf K.A., and Wong H.K.T. Vertical distribution of gaseous elemental mercury in Canada. Journal of Geophysical Research 108 D9 (2003) 4264 10.1029/2002JD002116
2. EPA 1631. Revision E: Mercury in Water by Oxidation, Purge and Trap, and Cold Vapor Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry, US EPA (August 2002). available at: http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/methods/method/mercury/
3. Fitzgerald W.F., and Gill G.A. Subnanogram determination of mercury by two-stage gold amalgamation and gas phase detection applied to atmospheric analysis. Analytical Chemistry 51 11 (September, 1979)
4. Friedli H.R., Radke L.F., Prescott R., Li P., Woo J.-H., and Carmichael G.R. Mercury in the atmosphere around Japan, Korea, and China as observed during the 2001 ACE-Asia field campaign: measurements, distributions, sources, and implications. Journal of Geophysical Research 109 (2004) D19S25 10.1029/2003JD004244
5. Landis M.S., Stevens R.K., Schaedlich F., and Prestbo E.M. Development and characterization of an annular denuder methodology for the measurement of divalent inorganic reactive mercury in the ambient air. Environmental Science & Technology 36 (2002) 3000-3009
6. Radke L.F., Friedli H.R., and Heikes B.G. Atmospheric mercury over the NE Pacific during spring 2002: gradients, residence time, upper troposphere lower stratosphere loss, and long-range transport. Journal of Geophysical Research 112 (2007) D19305 10.1029/2005JD005828
7. Schroeder W.H., and Munthe J. Atmospheric mercury - an overview. Atmospheric Environment 32 5 (1998) 809-822
8. Swartzendruber, P.C., Jaffe, D.A., Finely, B., February 2009. Development and first results of an aircraft based, high time resolution mercury speciation technique, in-preparation.
9. Swartzendruber P.C., Chand D., Jaffe D.A., Smith J., Reidmiller D., Gratz L., Keeler J., Strode S., Jaegle L., and Talbot R. Vertical distribution of mercury, CO, ozone, and aerosol scattering coefficient in the Pacific Northwest during the spring 2006 INTEX-B campaign. Journal of Geophysical Research 113 (2008) D10305 10.1029/2007JD009579
10. 0 in the upper troposphere-lower stratosphere. Geophysical Research Letters 34 (2007) L23804 10.1029/2007GL031366
11. 0 in the Mexico City area and over the North Pacific. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 8 (2008) 2103-2114