Decision support for iteration scheduling in agile environments

Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing

Volumn 32 LNBIP, Issue , 2009, Pages 156-170

  Szoke, Ákos ^a  

^a BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Agile planning; Iteration planning; Scheduling

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS;

AGILE ENVIRONMENT; AGILE PLANNING; AGILE PROCESS; DECISION SUPPORTS; FEASIBLE SCHEDULE; ITERATION PLANNING; LOAD-BALANCING; OPTIMIZED SCHEDULE; PLAN-BASED; RISK VALUE; SCHEDULING METHODS; SOFTWARE BUSINESS; TIME-TO-MARKET;

SCHEDULING;

EID: 70149121478     PISSN: 18651348     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-02152-7_13     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Dybå, T., Dingsøyr, T.: Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review. Information & Software Technology 50, 833-859 (2008)
2. Ambler, S.W.: Survey says: Agile works in practice. Dr. Dobb's Journal (2006), http://www.ddj.com
3. Chow, T., Cao, D.B.: A survey study of critical success factors in agile software projects. Journal of System and Software 81, 961-971 (2008)
4. Layman, L., Williams, L., Cunningham, L.: Motivations and measurements in an agile case study. Journal of Systems Architecture 52, 654-667 (2006)
5. Manifesto for agile software development, http://www.agilemanifesto.org
6. Declaration of interdependence for agile software project management, http://pmdoi.org
7. Scott, W., Ambler, P.K.: Lean development governance. Technical report, IBM Rational Software (2007)
8. Qumer, A., Henderson-Sellers, B.: An evaluation of the degree of agility in six agile methods and its applicability for method engineering. Information & Software Technology 50, 280-295 (2008)
9. Cohn, M.: Agile Estimating and Planning. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River (2005)
10. Dubakov, M., Stevens, P.: Agile Tools: The good, the bad, the ugly. Agile Journal (2008), http://www.agilejournal.com
11. Microsoft office project, sdk (2003), http://msdn2.microsoft.com
12. Rally homepage, http://www.rallydev.com
13. Xplanner homepage, http://xplanner.codehaus.org
14. Ruhe, G., Saliu, M.: The art and science of software release planning. IEEE Software 22, 47-53 (2005)
15. Aurum, A., Wohlin, C.: The fundamental nature of requirements engineering activities as a decision-making process. Information & Software Technology 45, 945-954 (2003)
16. Karlsson, L., Thelin, T., Regnell, B., Berander, P., Wohlin, C.: Pair-wise comparisons versus planning game partitioning-experiments on requirements prioritisation techniques. Empirical Software Engineering 12, 3-33 (2007)
17. Carlshamre, P., Sandahl, K., Lindvall, M., Regnell, B., Dag, J.: An industrial survey of requirements interdependencies in software product release planning. In: RE 2001: Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, pp. 84-93. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2001)
18. Li, C., van den Akker, J.M., Brinkkemper, S., Diepen, G.: Integrated requirement selection and scheduling for the release planning of a software product. In: Sawyer, P., Paech, B., Heymans, P. (eds.) REFSQ 2007. LNCS, vol. 4542, pp. 93-108. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
19. Boehm, B.W., Horowitz, E., Madachy, R., Reifer, D., Clark, B.K., Steece, B., Brown, W.A., Chulani, S., Abts, C.: Software Cost Estimation with Cocomo II. Prentice Hall PTR, Englewood Cliffs (2000)
20. Jung, H.W.: Optimizing value and cost in requirements analysis. IEEE Software 15, 74-78 (1998)
21. van den Akker, M., Brinkkemper, S., Diepen, G., Versendaal, J.: Software product release planning through optimization and what-if analysis. Information & Software Technology 50, 101-111 (2008)
22. Denne, M., Cleland-Huang, J.: The incremental funding method: Data-driven software development. IEEE Software 21, 39-47 (2004)
23. Szoke, A.: A proposed method for release planning from use case-based requirements. In: Euromicro SEAA 2008: Proceedings of the 34th Euromicro Conference, pp. 449-456. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2008)
24. Larman, C.: Agile and Iterative Development: A Manager's Guide. Pearson Education, London (2003)
25. Ambler, S.W., Jeffries, R.: Agile modeling: effective practices for extreme programming and the unified process. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York (2002)
26. Unified modeling language version 2.0, http://www.uml.org
27. Schwindt, C.: Resource Allocation in Project Management. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
28. Multilogic homepage, http://www.multilogic.hu
29. Microsoft sharepoint (2007), http://www.microsoft.com/sharepoint/
30. Mathworks homepage, http://www.mathworks.com/
31. Kellner, M., Madachy, R., Raffo, D.: Software process simulation modeling: Why? what? how? Journal of Systems and Software 46, 91-105 (1999)