Computer-simulated fluid dynamics of arterial perfusion in extracorporeal circulation: From reality to virtual simulation

International Journal of Artificial Organs

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 362-370

  Fukuda, Ikuo ^a   Osanai, Satoshi ^b   Shirota, Minori ^b   Inamura, Takao ^b   Yanaoka, Hideki ^b   Minakawa, Masahito ^a   Fukui, Kozo ^a  

^a HIROSAKI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b HIROSAKI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Arterial perfusion; Atheroembolism; Computation model; Flow dynamics; Numerical simulation

Indexed keywords

ARCHES; BLOOD; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; FLOW PATTERNS; FLOW VELOCITY; GLASS; HEMODYNAMICS; NUMERICAL MODELS; VELOCITY;

AORTIC ARCH; ARTERIAL PERFUSION; ATHEROEMBOLISM; BLOOD FLOW; COMPUTATION MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION MODELING; EXTRACORPOREAL CIRCULATION; FLOW DYNAMICS; GLASS MODELS; SIMULATED FLUIDS;

BLOOD VESSELS;

AORTA ANEURYSM; AORTA ARCH; AORTA FLOW; ARTERY CATHETERIZATION; ARTERY PERFUSION; ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXTRACORPOREAL CIRCULATION; REPRODUCIBILITY;

EID: 70149119453     PISSN: 03913988     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/039139880903200607     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Fukuda I, Minakawa M, Fukui K, Taniguchi S, Daitoku K, Suzuki Y, Hashimoto H. Breakdown of atheromatous plaque due to shear force from arterial perfusion cannula. Ann Thorac Surg 2007; 84: e17-8.
2. Ura M, Sakata R, Nakayama Y, Goto T. Ultrasonographic demonstration of manipulation-related aortic injuries after cardiac surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35: 1303-10.
3. Minakawa M, Fukuda I, Yamazaki J, Fukui K, Yanaoka H, Inamura T. Effect of cannula shape on aortic wall and flow turbulence: hydrodynamic study during extracorporeal circulation in mock thoracic aorta. Artif Organs 2007; 31: 880-6.
4. Lien FS, Chen WL, Leschziner MA. Low-Raynolds-number eddy-viscosity modeling based on non-linear stress-strain/vorticity relations. Proceedings of 3rd Symposium on Engineering Turbulence Modeling and Measurements. Crete, Greece, 1996.
5. Shin TH, Zhu J, Lumley JL. A realizable Reynolds stress algebraic equation model. NASA TM-105993, 1993. http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/ casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19930007407_1993007407.pdf
6. Patankar SV, Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow. New York: McGraw-Hill Int. Book Co.; 1980. p 126-9.
7. Issa RI. Solution of the Implicitly Discretised Fluid Flow Equations by Operator-Splitting. J Comp Phys 1985; 62: 40-65.
8. METHODOLOGY STAR-CD Version 3.26, London; CD-adapco, 1994.
9. Mori D, Yamaguchi T. Computational fluid dynamics modeling and analysis of the effect of 3-D distortion of the human aortic arch. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2002; 5: 249-60.
10. Morris L, Delassus P, Callanan A, Walsh M, Wallis F, Grace P, McGloughlin T. 3-D numerical simulation of blood flow through models of the human aorta. J Biomech Eng 2005; 127: 767-75.
11. Shahcheraghi N, Dwyer HA, Cheer AY, Barakat AI, Rutaganira T. Unsteady and three-dimensional simulation of blood flow in the human aortic arch. J Biomech Eng 2002; 124: 378-87.
12. Gerdes A, Joubert-Hübner E, Esders K, Sievers HH. Hydrodynamics of aortic arch vessels during perfusion through the right subclavian artery. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 69: 1425-30.
13. Bogren HG, Mohiaddin RH, Yang GZ, Kilner PJ, Firmin DN. Magnetic resonance velocity vector mapping of blood flow in thoracic aortic aneurysms and grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995; 110: 704-14.
14. Endo S, Sohara Y, Karino T. Flow patterns in dog aortic arch under a steady flow condition simulating mid-systole. Heart Vessels 1996; 11: 180-91.
15. Kilner PJ, Yang GZ, Mohiaddin RH, Firmin DN, Longmore DB. Helical and retrograde secondary flow patterns in the aortic arch studied by three-directional magnetic resonance velocity mapping. Circulation 1993; 88 (part 1): 2235-47.
16. Cape EG. Mathematical modeling in the evaluation and design of surgical procedures. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996; 111: 499-501.
17. Eagle KA, Guyton RA, Davidoff R, et al; American College of Cardiology; American Heart Association. ACC/AHA 2004 Guideline update for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation 2004; 110: e340-437
18. Almassi GH, Sommers T, Moritz TE, et al. Stroke in cardiac surgical patients: Determinants and outcome. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 68: 391-8.
19. Barbut D, Lo YW, Hartman GS, et al. Aortic atheroma is related to outcome but not numbers of emboli during coronary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 64: 454-9.
20. McKhann GM, Goldsborough MA, Borowicz LM, et al. Predictors of stroke risk in coronary artery bypass patients. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 63: 516-21.
21. Joubert-Huebner E, Gerdes A, Sievers HH. An in vitro evaluation of a new cannula tip design compared with two clinically established cannula-tip designs regarding aortic arch vessel perfusion characteristics. Perfusion 2000; 15: 69-76.
22. Gerdes A, Hanke T, Sievers HH. Hydrodynamics of the new Medos aortic cannula. Perfusion 2002;17: 217-20.
23. Osanai S, Inamura T, Yanaoka H, Fukuda I, Minakawa M, Fukui K. (Numerical Simulation of Flow in Aortic Arch at Extracorporeal Circulation (In Japanese). J Jpn Coll Angiology 2008; 48: 313-8.