Investigation of factors affecting healthcare organization's adoption of telemedicine technology

Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

Volumn 2000-January, Issue , 2000, Pages

  Hu, Paul Jen Hwa ^a   Chau, Patrick Y K ^b   Liu Sheng, Olivia R ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; HEALTH CARE;

CLASSIFICATION ACCURACY; EXPLORATORY STUDIES; HEALTHCARE ORGANIZATIONS; HONG-KONG; ORGANIZATIONAL ADOPTIONS; PUBLIC HEALTHCARES; RESEARCH MODELS; TELEMEDICINE TECHNOLOGY;

TELEMEDICINE;

EID: 70149119054     PISSN: 15301605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Bashshur, R.L, Sanders, J.H., and Shannon, G.W. (eds.), Telemedicine: Theory and Practice, Charles Thomas, Springfield, IL, 1997.
2. Perednia, D.A., and Allen, A., “Telemedicine Technology and Clinical Applications,” Journal of American Medical Association, Vol.273, No.6, 1995, pp.483-488.
3. Tornatzky, L.G. and Fleischer, M., The Process of Technological Innovation, Lexington Books, Lexington, MA, 1990.
4. Jutra, A., “Teleroentgen Diagnosis by Means of Videotape Recording,” American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol.82, 1959, pp.1099-1102.
5. Wittson, C.L., Afflect, D.C., and Johnson, V., “Two-way Television Group Therapy,” Mental Hospitals, Vol.12, 1961, pp.22-23.
6. Mitchell, B.R., Mitchell, J.G., and Disney, A.P., “User Adoption Issues in Renal Telemedicine,” Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, Vol.2, No.2, 1996, pp.81-86.
7. Mairinger, T., Gable, C., Derwan, P., Mikuz, G., and Ferrer-Roca, O., “What Do Physicians Think of Telemedicine? A Survey in Different European Regions,” Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, Vol.2, No.1, 1996, pp.50-56.
8. Gschwendtner, A., Netzer, T., Mairinger, B., and Mairinger, T., “What Do Students Think About Telemedicine?” Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, Vol.3, No.3, 1997, pp.169-171.
9. Liu Sheng, O. R., Hu, P.J., Wei, C., Higa, K., and Au, G., “Adoption and Diffusion of Telemedicine Technology in Healthcare Organizations: A Comparative Case Study in Hong Kong,” Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, Vol.8, No.4, 1998, pp.247-75.
10. Niederman, F., Brancheau, J.C., and Wetherbe, J.C., “Information Systems Issues for the 1990s,” MIS Quarterly, Vol.15, No.4, December 1991, pp.475-500.
11. Brancheau, J.C., Janz, B.D., and Wetherbe, J.C., “Key Issues in Information Systems Management: 1994-95 SIM Delphi Results,” MIS Quarterly, Vol.20, No.2, June 1996, pp.225-242.
12. Rogers, E.M., Diffusion of Innovations, 4th Edition, Free Press, New York, NY, 1995.
13. Brancheau, J.C. and Wetherbe, J.C., “The Adoption of Spreadsheet Software: Testing Innovation Diffusion Theory in the Context of End-User Computing,” Information Systems Research, Vol.1, No.2, 1990, pp.115-143.
14. Fichman, R.G., “Information Technology Diffusion: A Review of Empirical Research,” Proc. of the Twelfth International Conference on Information Systems, Dallas TX, December 1992, pp.195-206.
15. Zmud, R.W., “Diffusion of Modern Software Practices: Influences of Centralization and Formalization,” Management Science, Vol.28, No.12, 1982, pp.1421-1431.
16. Bretschneider, S., “Management Information Systems in Public and Private Organizations: An Empirical Test,” Public Administration Review, Vol.50, No.5, 1990, pp.536-545.
17. Cooper, R. and Zmud, R., “Information Technology Implementation: A Technological Diffusion Approach,” Management Science, Vol.36, No.2, 1990, pp.156-172.
18. Kimberley, J.R. and Evanisko M.J., “Organizational Innovation: The Influence of Individual, Organizational, and Contextual Factors on Hospital Adoption of Technological and Administrative Innovations, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.24, No.4, 1981, pp.689-713.
19. Davis, F.D., A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-user Information Systems: Theory and Result, Doctoral Dissertation, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1986.
20. Iacovou, C.L., Benbasat, I., and Dexter, A.S., “Electronic Data Interchange and Small Organizations: Adoption and Impact of Technology,” MIS Quarterly, Vol.19, 1995, pp.465-485.
21. Nickell, G.S. and Seado, P.C., “The Impact of Attitudes and Experience on Small Business Computer Use,” American Journal of Small Business, Vol.10, No.4, 1986, pp.37-47.
22. Thong, J. and Yap, C.S., “CEO Characteristics, Organizational Characteristics and Information Technology Adoption in Small Business,” Omega: The International Journal of Management Science, Vol.23, No.4, 1995, pp.429-442.
23. Rai, A. and Yakuni, R., “A Structural Model for CASE Adoption Behavior,” Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.13, No.2, 1996, pp.205-234.
24. Chau, P.Y.K. and Tam, K.Y., “Factors Affecting the Adoption of Open Systems: An Exploratory Study,” MIS Quarterly, Vol.21, No.1, March 1997, pp.1-24.
25. Moore, G.C. and Benbasat, I., “Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perception of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation,” Information Systems Research, Vol.2, No.3, 1991, pp.192-223.
26. Hufnagel, E.M. and Conca, C., “User Response Data: The Potential for Errors and Biases,” Information Systems Research, Vol.5, No.1, 1994, pp.48-73.
27. Straub, D.W., “Validating Instruments in MIS Research,” MIS Quarterly, Vol.13, No.2, June 1989, pp.147-169.
28. Nunnally, J.C. Psychometric Theory, 2nd Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978