Red queen dynamics with non-standard fitness interactions

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 5, Issue 8, 2009, Pages

  Engelstädter, Jan ^a   Bonhoeffer, Sebastian ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEALTH;

ANTAGONISTIC COEVOLUTION; CONDITION; DYNAMIC RECOMBINATION; GENETIC INTERACTION; GENOTYPE FREQUENCIES; HOST-PARASITE INTERACTIONS; INTERACTION MATRICES; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; PARASITE-; SIMPLE MODELING;

DYNAMICS;

ARTICLE; EPISTASIS; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE INTERACTION; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENOTYPE; HOST PARASITE INTERACTION; MICROBIAL POPULATION DYNAMICS; SIMULATION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETIC SELECTION; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; POPULATION GENETICS;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENETICS, POPULATION; GENOTYPE; HOST-PARASITE INTERACTIONS; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; MODELS, GENETIC; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SELECTION (GENETICS);

EID: 70049112305     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000469     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Jayakar SD (1970) A mathematical model for interaction of gene frequencies in a parasite and its host. Theoretical Population Biology 1: 140-164.
2. Seger J (1988) Dynamics of some simple host-parasite models with more than 2 genotypes in each species. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 319: 541-555.
3. Kouyos RD, Salathe M, Bonhoeffer S (2007) The Red Queen and the persistence of linkage-disequilibrium oscillations in finite and infinite populations. BMC Evolutionary Biology 7: 211.
4. Decaestecker E, Gaba S, Raeymaekers JAM, Stoks R, Van Kerckhoven L, et al. (2007) Host-parasite 'Red Queen' dynamics archived in pond sediment. Nature 450: 870-U816.
5. Jaenike J (1978) An hypothesis to account for the mainenance of sex within populations. Evolutionary Theory 3: 191-194.
6. Salathé M, Kouyos RD, Bonhoeffer S (2008) The state of affairs in the kingdom of the Red Queen. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 23: 439-445.
7. Otto SP, Gerstein AC (2006) Why have sex? The population genetics of sex and recombination. Biochemical Society Transactions 34: 519-522.
8. Barton NH, Charlesworth B (1998) Why sex and recombination? Science 281: 1986-1990.
9. Otto SP, Lenormand T (2002) Resolving the paradox of sex and recombination. Nature Reviews Genetics 3: 252-261.
10. Barton NH (1995) A general model for the evolution of recombination. Genetical Research 65: 123-144.
11. Peters AD, Lively CM (2007) Short- and long-term benefits and detriments to recombination under antagonistic coevolution. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20: 1206-1217.
12. Salathé M, Kouyos RD, Bonhoeffer S (2009) On the causes of selection for recombination underlying the Red Queen Hypothesis. American Naturalist 174: S31-S42.
13. Gandon S, Otto SP (2007) The evolution of sex and recombination in response to abiotic or coevolutionary fluctuations in epistasis. Genetics 175: 1835-1853. (Pubitemid 46789967)
14. Salathé M, Kouyos RD, Regoes RR, Bonhoeffer S (2008) Rapid parasite adaptation drives selection for high recombination rates. Evolution 62: 295-300. (Pubitemid 351294550)
15. Howard RS, Lively CM (1994) Parasitism, mutation accumulation and the maintenance of sex. Nature 367: 554-557. (Pubitemid 24055512)
16. Otto SP, Nuismer SL (2004) Species interactions and the evolution of sex. Science 304: 1018-1020.
17. Peters AD, Lively CM (1999) The red queen and fluctuating epistasis: A population genetic analysis of antagonistic coevolution. American Naturalist 154: 393-405.
18. Hamilton WD, Axelrod R, Tanese R (1990) Sexual reproduction as an adaptation to resist parasites (a review). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 87: 3566-3573. (Pubitemid 20173678)
19. Parker MA (1994) Pathogens and sex in plants. Evolutionary Ecology 8: 560-584.
20. Flor HH (1955) Host-parasite interaction in flax rust - its genetics and other implications. Phytopathology 45: 680-685.
21. Nee S (1989) Antagonistic co-evolution and the evolution of genotypic randomization. Journal of Theoretical Biology 140: 499-518.
22. Agrawal A, Lively CM (2002) Infection genetics: gene-for-gene versus matching-alleles models and all points in between. Evolutionary Ecology Research 4: 79-90. (Pubitemid 135693221)
23. Carius HJ, Little TJ, Ebert D (2001) Genetic variation in a host-parasite association: Potential for coevolution and frequency-dependent selection. Evolution 55: 1136-1145.
24. Bevan JR, Clarke DD, Crute IR (1993) Resistance to Erysiphe fischeri in 2 populations of Senecio vulgaris. Plant Pathology 42: 636-646. (Pubitemid 24415870)
25. Bevan JR, Crute IR, Clarke DD (1993) Diversity and Variation in Expression of Resistance to Erysiphe fischeri in Senecio vulgaris. Plant Pathology 42: 647-653. (Pubitemid 24415871)
26. Dybdahl MF, Lively CM (1998) Host-parasite coevolution: Evidence for rare advantage and time-lagged selection in a natural population. Evolution 52: 1057-1066.
27. Lively CM, Dybdahl MF (2000) Parasite adaptation to locally common host genotypes. Nature 405: 679-681.
28. Alizon S, Hurford A, Mideo N, Baalen Mv (2009) Virulence evolution and the trade-off hypothesis: history, current state of affairs and the future. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 22: 245-259.
29. Kouyos RD, Salathé M, Otto SP, Bonhoeffer S (2009) The role of epistasis on the evolution of recombination in host-parasite coevolution. Theoretical Population Biology 75: 1-13.
30. Altenberg L, Feldman MW (1987) Selection, generalized transmission and the evolution of modifier genes. 1. The Reduction Principle. Genetics 117: 559-572.