Collaboration between local health and local government agencies for health improvement

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Volumn , Issue 3, 2009, Pages

  Hayes, Sara ^b   Mann, Mala K ^a   Sander, Lesley V ^a   Morgan, Fiona ^a   Carter, Ben ^a   Kitcher, Hilary ^a   Weightman, Alison L ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b National Assembly for Wales   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GOVERNMENT; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; REVIEW;

EID: 70049100239     PISSN: 1469493X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007825.pub2     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Benzeval M, Judge K, Whitehead M (Eds). Tackling inequalities in health; an agenda for action. London: King's Fund 1995.
2. Burger VW. Selection Bias and covariate imbalances in Randomised Clinical Trials. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, 2005.
3. US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Coordination Center for Health Promotion. Wisewoman. A crosscutting program to improve the health of uninsured women. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2007.
4. Curran JA, Dartnell J, Magee K, Sinclair D, McGrath PJ. Organisational and professional interventions to promote the uptake of evidence in emergency care: Effects on professional practice and health outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 2. [DOI: DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006557]
5. Dickinson H. The evaluation of health and social care partnerships: an analysis of approaches and synthesis for the future. Health and Social Care in the Community 2006;14(5):375-383. (Pubitemid 44259393)
6. Egger M, Davey Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by simple graphical test. British Medical Journal 1997;315:629-634. (Pubitemid 27387172)
7. Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Review Group. Data Collection Checklist. Ottawa: Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Review Group 2007.
8. Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Review Group. Data Abstraction Form. Ottawa: Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Review Group 2007.
9. Gillies P. Effectiveness of alliances and partnerships for health promotion. Health Promotion International 1998;13(2):99-120. (Pubitemid 28271389)
10. Great Britain. Local Authority Social Services Act 1970. London: HMSO 1970.
11. Great Britain. Local Government Act 1972 (c70). London: HMSO 1972.
12. Great Britain. National Health Service Reorganisation Act 1973 (c32). London: HMSO 1973.
13. Great Britain. The National Health Services Act 1977 (c22). London: HMSO 1977.
14. Great Britain. Health Act 1999 (c31). London: Office of Public Sector Information 1999.
15. Hardy B, Husdon B, Waddington E. Assessing strategic partnership The Partnership Assessment Tool. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister 2003.
16. Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta analysis. Statistics in Medicine 2002;21(11):1539-1558.
17. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.0.0 [updated February 2008]. Oxford: The Cochrane Collaboration 2008.
18. HM Government. Tackling drugs together: A strategy for England 1995-1998 (Cmd 2846). London: HMSO 1995.
19. HM Government. Tackling drugs to build a better Britain: The government's ten year strategy for tackling drug misuse (Cmd 3945). London: HMSO 1998.
20. World Health Organization. Jakarta Declaration. Jakarta: Fourth International Conference on Health Promotion. 1997.
21. Laws, Statutes. London:HMSO. 1973. Reorganisation of the National Health Service and Local Government in England and Wales: A report of the working party on Collaboration between the NHS and Local Government on its activities to the end of 1972. London: HMS0 1973.
22. Laws, Statutes. Reorganisation of the National Health Service and Local Government in England and Wales: A report of the working party on Collaboration between the NHS and Local Government on its activities from January to July 1973 [London: HMSO]. 1973.
23. Laws, Statutes. Reorganisation of the National Health Service and Local Government in England and Wales: A report of the working party on Collaboration between the NHS and Local Government on its activities from July 1973 to April 1974. London: HMSO 1974.
24. Marmot M. Social determinants of health inequalities. Lancet 2005;365:1099-1103.
25. Morris EB for the Cochrane Health Equity Field. Equity Checklist for Reviewers. Version 2007=10=10. Personal communication. November 21, 2007.
26. Padgett SM, Bekemeir B, Berkowitz B. Collaborative partnerships at state and national levels: promoting systems changes in public health infrastructure. Journal of Public Health Management & Practice 2004;10(3):251-257.
27. Primary and Community Health Branch, Victorian Government Department of Human Services. Primary Care Partnerships Strategic Directions 2004-2006. Melbourne: Department of Human Services, State of Victoria 2004:http://www. health.vic.gov.au/pcps/downloads/strategy/pcp-strat-2004-06.pdf.
28. Primary and Community Health Branch, Victorian Government Department of Human Services. Primary Care Partnerships: Working together, achieving more. Melbourne: Department of Human Services, State of Victoria, 2005:http://www. health.vic.gov.au/pcps/downloads/publications/pcp-generalrpt-jul05.pdf.
29. Ramsay C, Matowe L, Grilli R, Grimshaw J, Thomas R. Interrupted time series designs in health technology assessment: lessons from two systematic review of behaviour chance strategies. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2003;19(4):613-623. (Pubitemid 38405635)
30. The Cochrane Collaboration. RevMan 5. Oxford: The Cochrane Collaboration 2008.
31. Smith SM, Soubhi H, Fortin M, Hudon C, O'Dowd T. Interventions to improve outcomes in patients withmultimorbidity in primary care and community settings. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 2. [DOI: DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006560]
32. HM Treasury. Choice for Parents, the best start for children: a ten year strategy for childcare. London: The Stationery Office 2004: http://www. surestart.gov.uk/aboutsurestart/about/strategy/.
33. Treadwell JR, Tregear SJ, Reston JT, Turkelson CM. A system for rating the stability and strength of medical evidence. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2006;6(52):http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1471-2288-6-52.pdf.
34. Victorian Health Promotion Foundation. The Partnerships Analysis Tool For Partners in Health Promotion. Carlton South: Victorian Health Promotion Foundation 2005:http://www.vichealth.vic.gov.au/~/media/ResourceCentre/ PublicationsandResources/VHP%
35. Wales Office of Research and Development for Health and Social Care. A systematic review of health outcomes from collaboration between health and local government agencies. Cardiff: Wales Office of Research and Development for Health and Social Care 2001.
36. World Health Organization. Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion. Ottawa: First International Conference on Health Promotion 1986. http://www.who.int/hpr/ NPH/docs/ottawa-charter-hp.pdf, 1986.
37. World Health Organization. The Bangkok Charter for Health Promotion in a Globalized World. The 6th Global Conference on Health Promotion. Bangkok: WHO, 2005:http://www.who.int/healthpromotion/conferences/6gchp/hpr-050829-%20BCHP. pdf.