Competition in a turbidostat for an inhibitory nutrient

Journal of Biological Dynamics

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 208-220

  Li, Bingtuan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE   (United States)

Author keywords

Coexistence; Feedback control; Limit cycle; Nonmonotone function; Turbidostat

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOREACTOR; FERMENTATION; THEORETICAL MODEL;

BIOREACTORS; FERMENTATION; MODELS, THEORETICAL;

EID: 70049090400     PISSN: 17513758     EISSN: 17513766     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17513750802018345     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Andrew, J. F., 1968. A mathematical model for the continuous culture of microorganisms utilizing inhibitory substrates. Biotechnol. Bioengrg., 10:707–723.
2. Aris, R., and Humphrey, A. E., 1977. Dynamics of a chemostat in which two organisms compete for a common substrate. Biotechnol. Bioengrg., 19:1375–1386.
3. Armstrong, R. A., and McGehee, R., 1980. Competitive exclusion. Amer. Natur., 115:151–170.
4. Boon, B., and Laudelout, H., 1962. Kinetics of nitrite oxidation by Nitrobacter winogradskyi. Biochem. J., 85:440–447.
5. Bush, A. W., and Cook, A. E., 1976. The effect of time delay and growth rate inhibition in the bacterial treatment of wastewater. J. Theoret. Biol., 63:385–395.
6. Butler, G. J., and Waltman, P., 1981. Bifurcation from a limit cycle in a two predator–one prey ecosystem modeled on a chemostat. J. Math. Biol., 12:295–310.
7. Butler, G. J., and Wolkowicz, G. S.K., 1985. A mathematical model of the chemostat with a general class of functions describing nutrient uptake. SIAM J. Appl. Math., 45:138–151.
8. De Leenheer, P., and Smith, H. L., 2003. Feedback control for the chemostat. J. Math. Biol., 46:48–70.
9. De Leenheer, P., Li, B., and Smith, H. L., 2003. Competition in the chemostat:Some remarks. Can. Appl. Math. Quar., 11:229–248.
10. Flegr, J., 1997. Two distinct types of natural selection in turbidostat-like and chemostat-like ecosystems. J. Theoret. Biol., 188:121–126.
11. Gouze, J.-L., and Robledo, G., 2005. Feedback control for nonmonotone competition models in the chemostat. Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl., 6:671–690.
12. Grover, J. P., 1997. Resource Competition, Chapman & Hall.
13. Hansen, S. R., and Hubbell, S. P., 1980. Single–nutrient microbial competition:Agreement between experimental and theoretical forecast outcomes. Science, 207:1491–1493.
14. Hsu, S. B., 1978. Limiting behavior for competing species. SIAM J. Appl. Math., 34:760–763.
15. Hsu, S. B., Hubbell, S., and Waltman, P., 1977. A mathematical theory of single-nutrient competition in continuous cultures of micro-organisms. SIAM J. Appl. Math., 32:366–383.
16. Huisman, J., and Weissing, F. J., 1999. Biodiversity of plankton by species oscillations and chaos. Nature, 402:407–410.
17. Levins, R., 1979. Coexistence in a variable environment. Amer. Natur., 114:765–783.
18. Li, B., 1999. Global asymptotic behaviour of the chemostat:General response functions and different removal rates. SIAM J. Appl. Math., 59:411–422.
19. Li, B., and Smith, H. L., 2003. Periodic coexistence of 4 species competing for 3 essential resources. Math. Biosci., 184:115–135.
20. Panikov, N. S., 1995. Microbial Growth Kinetics, New York:Chapman & Hall.
21. Shuler, M. L., and Kargi, F., 1992. Bioprocess Engineering, Basic Concepts, Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
22. Smith, H. L., and Waltman, P., 1995. The Theory of the Chemostat, Cambridge University Press.
23. Sommer, U., 1985. Comparison between steady states and non-steady competition:Experiments with natural phytoplankton. Limnol. Oceanogr., 30:335–346.
24. Thieme, H. R., 1993. Persistence under relaxed point-dissipativity (with applications to an epidemic model). SIAM J. Math. Anal., 24:407–435.
25. Thieme, H. R., 1994. Asymptotically autonomous differential equations in the plane II. Stricter Poincaré-Bendixson type result. Differ. Integral Equ., 7:1625–1640.
26. Tilman, D., 1982. Resource Competition and Community Structure, Princeton, NJ:Princeton U. P.
27. Wolkowicz, G. S.K., and Lu, Z., 1992. Global dynamics of a mathematical model of competition in the chemostat:General response function and differential death rates. SIAM J. Appl. Math., 52:222–233.