Nash equilibria in multi-agent motor interactions

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 5, Issue 8, 2009, Pages

  Braun, Daniel A ^a,b   Ortega, Pedro A ^a   Wolpert, Daniel M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS; MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS;

DECISION MAKERS; EVOLUTIONARY GAME THEORY; GAME-THEORETIC; MULTI AGENT; NASH EQUILIBRIA; OPTIMAL STRATEGIES; PRISONERS' DILEMMA; SENSORIMOTORS; SOCIAL INTERACTIONS; ULTIMATUM GAME;

GAME THEORY;

ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; GAME; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; METHODOLOGY; MOTOR SYSTEM; POPULATION DYNAMICS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; SOCIAL INTERACTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; POPULATION GENETICS; THEORETICAL MODEL;

GAME THEORY; GENETICS, POPULATION; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; MOTOR ACTIVITY;

EID: 70049090388     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000468     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Fudenberg D, Tirole J (1991) Game theory. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
2. Camerer C (2003) Behavioral game theory: experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
3. Sanfey AG (2007) Social decision-making: insights from game theory and neuroscience. Science 318: 598-602. (Pubitemid 350014800)
4. Jensen K, Call J, Tomasello M (2007) Chimpanzees are rational maximizers in an ultimatum game. Science 318: 107-109. (Pubitemid 47538043)
5. Memmert D (2006) Self-controlled practice of decision-making skills. Percept Mot Skills 103: 879-882.
6. King-Casas B, Tomlin D, Anen C, Camerer CF, Quartz SR, et al. (2005) Getting to know you: reputation and trust in a two-person economic exchange. Science 308: 78-83. (Pubitemid 40471001)
7. Lee D, McGreevy BP, Barraclough DJ (2005) Learning and decision making in monkeys during a rock-paper-scissors game. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 25: 416-430. (Pubitemid 41443348)
8. Shafir E, Tversky A (1992) Thinking through uncertainty: nonconsequential reasoning and choice. Cognit Psychol 24: 449-474.
9. Nash JF (1950) Equilibrium Points in N-Person Games. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 36: 48-49.
10. Glicksberg IL (1952) A Further Generalization of the Kakutani Fixed Point Theorem, with Application to Nash Equilibrium Points. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 3: 170-174.
11. Fan K (1952) Fixed-point and Minimax Theorems in Locally Convex Topological Linear Spaces. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 38: 121-126.
12. Debreu G (1952) A Social Equilibrium Existence Theorem. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 38: 886-893.
13. Le S, Boyd R (2007) Evolutionary dynamics of the continuous iterated prisoner's dilemma. J Theor Biol 245: 258-267. (Pubitemid 46275746)
14. Papavassilopoulos GP, Medanic JV, Cruz JB (1979) Existence of Nash strategies and solutions to coupled Riccati equations in linear-quadratic games. J Optim Theory Appl 28: 49-76.
15. Basar T, Olsder GJ (1999) Dynamic noncooperative game theory. Philadelphia, Pa.: SIAM.
16. Poundstone W (1992) Prisoner's dilemma. New York Doubleday.
17. Howard IS, Ingram JN, Wolpert DM (2009) A modular planar robotic manipulandum with end-point torque control. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 181: 199-211.
18. Todorov E, Jordan MI (2002) Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nature neuroscience 5: 1226-1235. (Pubitemid 35247183)
19. Diedrichsen J (2007) Optimal task-dependent changes of bimanual feedback control and adaptation. Curr Biol 17: 1675-1679.
20. Kelso JAS (1995) Dynamic patterns : the self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, Mass.; London: MIT Press. xvii,334 p.
21. Schaal S, Mohajerian P, Ijspeert A (2007) Dynamics systems vs. optimal control-a unifying view. Progress in brain research 165: 425-445. (Pubitemid 47513886)
22. Ringelmann M (1913) Recherches sur les moteurs animés: Travail de l'homme. Annales de l'Institut National Argonomique 12: 1-40.
23. Karau S, Williams KD (1993) Social Loafing: A Meta-Analytic Review and Theoretical Integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65: 681-706.
24. Reichenbach T, Mobilia M, Frey E (2007) Mobility promotes and jeopardizes biodiversity in rock-paper-scissors games. Nature 448: 1046-1049. (Pubitemid 47345589)
25. Kerr B, Riley MA, Feldman MW, Bohannan BJ (2002) Local dispersal promotes biodiversity in a real-life game of rock-paper-scissors. Nature 418: 171-174. (Pubitemid 34773769)
26. Bshary R, Grutter AS, Willener AS, Leimar O (2008) Pairs of cooperating cleaner fish provide better service quality than singletons. Nature 455: 964-966.
27. Stephens DW, McLinn CM, Stevens JR (2002) Discounting and reciprocity in an Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma. Science 298: 2216-2218. (Pubitemid 35471252)
28. Smith JM (1982) Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Colman AM (2003) Cooperation, psychological game theory, and limitations of rationality in social interaction. The Behavioral and brain sciences 26: 139-153; discussion 153-198.
30. Acevedo M, Krueger JI (2005) Evidential reasoning in the prisoner's dilemma. Am J Psychol 118: 431-457.
31. McNamara JM, Barta Z, Houston AI (2004) Variation in behaviour promotes cooperation in the Prisoner's Dilemma game. Nature 428: 745-748. (Pubitemid 38508283)
32. Fowler JH, Johnson T, Smirnov O (2005) Human behaviour: Egalitarian motive and altruistic punishment. Nature 433: E1.
33. Roberts G, Renwick JS (2003) The development of cooperative relationships: an experiment. Proc Biol Sci 270: 2279-2283.
34. Nowak MA (2006) Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science 314: 1560-1563.
35. Axelrod R, Hamilton WD (1981) The evolution of cooperation. Science 211: 1390-1396.
36. Milinski M, Wedekind C (1998) Working memory constrains human cooperation in the Prisoner's Dilemma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95: 13755-13758. (Pubitemid 28523045)
37. Nowak M, Sigmund K (1993) A strategy of win-stay, lose-shift that outperforms tit-for-tat in the Prisoner's Dilemma game. Nature 364: 56-58. (Pubitemid 23233453)
38. Aumann R (1959) Acceptable points in general cooperative n-person games. In: Tucker A, Luce R, eds. Contribution to the Theory of Games, Vol IV, Annals of Mathematics Studies. pp 287-324.
39. Polezzi D, Daum I, Rubaltelli E, Lotto L, Civai C, et al. (2008) Mentalizing in economic decision-making. Behav Brain Res 190: 218-223.
40. Von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1944) Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press. xviii,625 p.
41. Harsanyi JC (1982) Papers in game theory. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co. xii,258 p.
42. Hu J, Wellman MP (1998) Multiagent Reinforcement Learning: Theoretical Framework and an Algorithm. Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Machine Learning: Morgan Kaufmann. pp 242-250.
43. Fudenberg D, Levine DK (1998) The theory of learning in games. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
44. Claus C, C. B (1998) The dynamics of reinforcement learning in cooperative multiagent systems. Proceedings of the fifteenth national conference on Artificial intelligence. pp 746-752.
45. Littman M (1994) Markov Games as a Framework for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning. Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Machine Learning. pp 157-163.
46. Stone P, Veloso M (2000) Multiagent Systems: A Survey from a Machine Learning Perspective. Autonomous Robots 8: 345-383. (Pubitemid 30904138)
47. Criscimagna-Hemminger SE, Donchin O, Gazzaniga MS, Shadmehr R (2003) Learned dynamics of reaching movements generalize from dominant to nondominant arm. Journal of neurophysiology 89: 168-176. (Pubitemid 36134011)