Introduce yourself at the beginning - Possible identification function of the initial part of the song in the Great Reed Warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus

Ornis Fennica

Volumn 86, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 61-70

  Wȩgrzyn, Ewa ^a   Leniowski, Konrad ^b   Osiejuk, Tomasz S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF RZESZÓW   (Poland)

^b ADAM MICKIEWICZ UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION; IDENTIFICATION METHOD; RECOGNITION; SONG; SONGBIRD;

ACROCEPHALUS ARUNDINACEUS;

EID: 70049089857     PISSN: 00305685     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Aubin, T., Jouventin, P. & Hildebrand, C, 2000: Penguins use the two-voice system to recognize each other. - Proceedings of the Royal Society B, Biological Sciences 267-1081-1087.
2. Aubin, T., Mathevon, N., Silva, M. L., Vielliard, J. M. E. and Sebe, F. 2004: How a simple and stereotyped acoustic signal transmits individual information: the song of the White-browed Warbler Basileuterus leucoblepharus.-Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences 76-335-344.
3. Bee, M. A., Kozich, C. E., Blackwell, K. J. & Gerhardt, H. C. 2001: Individual variation in advertisement calls of territorial male green frogs, Rana clamitans: Implications for individual discrimination. - Ethology 107-65-84.
4. Beecher, M. D. 1982: Signature systems and kin recognition. - American Zoologist 22-477-490.
5. Beecher, M. D. 1988: Kin recognition in birds. - Behaviour Genetics 18-465-482.
6. Bradbury, J. W. & Vehrencamp, S. L. 1998: Principles of animal communication. - Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Chapter 18-571-615.
7. Catchpole, C. K. 1983: Variation in the song of the Great Reed Warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus in relation to mate attraction and territorial defence. - Animal Behaviour 31-1217-1225.
8. Catchpole, C. K. 1986: Song repertoires and reproductive success in the great reed warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus. - Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 19-439-445.
9. Charrier, I., Jouventin, P., Mathevon, N. & Aubin T. 2001: Individual identity coding depends on call type in the South Polar Skua Catharacta maccormicki. - Polar Biology 24-378-382.
10. Christie, P. J., Mennill D. J. & Ratcliffe, L. M. 2004: Chickadee song structure is individually distinctive over long broadcast distances. - Behaviour 141-101-124.
11. Cucco, M. & Malacarne, G. 999: Is the song of black restart males an honest signal of status? - Condor 101-689-694.
12. Dabelsteen, T., McGregor, P. K., Lampc, H. M., Langmore, N. E. & Holland, J. 1998: Quiet song in song birds: an overlooked phenomenon. - Bioacoustics 9-89-106.
13. Dale, J., Lank, D. B., Reeve, H. K., 2001: Signaling individual identity versus quality: a model and case studies with Ruffs, Quails, and House Finches.-The American Naturalist 158-75-86.
14. Elfström, S. T. 1990: Individual and species-specific song patterns of Rock and Meadow Pipits: physical characteristics and experiments.- Bioacoustics 2-227-301.
15. Falls, J. B. 1982: Individual recognition by sounds in birds. - In Acoustic Communication in Birds, Vol. 2 (ed. Kroodsma, D. E. and Miller, E. H.) : 237-278. Academic Press, New York.
16. Falls, J. B. & Brooks, R. J. 1975: Individual recognition by song in white-throated sparrows. II. Effects of location. -Canadian Journal of Zoology 53-1412-1420.
17. Forstmeier, W, Hasselquist, D., Bensch, S., Leisler, B. 2005: Does song reflect age and viability? A comparison between two populations of the great reed warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus. - Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 59-634-643.
18. Gentner, T. Q., Hulse, S. H., Bentley, G. E. & Ball, G. F. 2000: Individual vocal recognition and the effect of partial lesions of the HVc on discrimination, learning, and categorization of conspecific song in adult songbirds. - Journal of Neurobiology 42-117-133.
19. Gil, D. & Gahr, M. 2002: The honesty of bird song: multiple constraints for multiple traits. - Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17-133-141.
20. Gilbert, G., McGregor, P. K. & Tyler, G. 1994: Vocal individuality as a census tool, practical considerations illustrated by a study of two rare species. - Journal of Field Ornithology 65-335-348.
21. Gilbert, G., Tyler, G. A. & Smith, K. W. 2002: Local annual survival of booming male great bittern Botaurus stellaris in Britain, in the period 1990-1999. - Ibis 144-256-262.
22. Godard, R., 1991. Long-term memory of individual neighbours in a migratory songbird. - Nature 350-228-229.
23. Grießmann, B. & Naguib, M. 2002: Song sharing in neighboring and non neighboring thrush nightingales Luscinia luscinia and its implications for communication. - Ethology 108-377-387.
24. Hasselquist, D. 1998: Polygyny in Great Reed Warblers: a long term study of factors contributing to male fitness. - Ecology 79-2376-2390.
25. Hasselquist, D., Bensch, S. & von Schantz, T. 1996: Correlation between male song repertoire, extra-pair paternity and offspring survival in the great reed warbler. - Nature 381-229-232.
26. Heuwinkel, H. 1982: Schalldruckpegel und Frequencspektren der Gesange von Acrocephalus arundinaceus, A. scirpaceus, A. schoenobaenus und A. palustris und ihre Beziehung zur Biotopakustik. - Ökologie der Vögel 4-85-174
27. Hyman, J. 2005: Seasonal variation in response to neighbors and strangers by a territorial songbird. - Ethology 111-951-961.
28. Johnstone, R. 1997: The evolution of animal signals. - In Behavioral Ecology: an Evolutionary Approach, 4th edn. (ed. Krebs, J. R. and Davies, N. B.) : 155-178. Blackwell, London.
29. Jouventin, P. & Aubin, T. 2002: Acoustic systems are adapted to breeding ecologies: individual recognition in nesting penguins. - Animal Behaviour 64-747-757.
30. Lambrechts, M. & Dhondt, A. 1995: Individual voice discrimination in birds. - In Current ornithology, Vol. 12. (ed. Power, D. M.) : 115. Plenum Press, New York.
31. Lengagne, T., Aubin, T. & Jouventin, P. 1999: How do king penguins (Aplenodytes patagonicus) apply the mathematical theory of information to communicate in windy conditions? - Proceedings of the Royal Society B, Biological Sciences 266-1623-1628.
32. Lengagne, T., Lauga, J. & Aubin, T. 2001: Intra-syllabic acoustic signatures used by the king penguin in parentchick recognition: an experimental approach.-Journal of Experimental Biology 204-663-672.
33. Lind, H., Dabelsteen, T., McGregor, P. K. 1996: Female great tits can identify mates by song.-Animal Behaviour 52-667-671.
34. Mackin, W. 2005: Neighbor-stranger discrimination in Audubon's shearwater Puffinus l. Iherminieri explained by a "real enemy" effect. - Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 59-326-332.
35. Molles, L. E. & Vehrencamp, S. L. 2001: Neighbour recognition by resident males in the banded wren Thryothoruspleurostictus a tropical songbird with high song type sharing. - Animal Behaviour 61-119-127.
36. Nelson, D. A. & Poesel, A. 2007: Segregation of information in a complex acoustic signal: individual and dialect identity in white-crowned sparrow song. - Animal Behaviour 74-1073-1084.
37. Osiejuk, T. S., Ratyńska K., Cygan J. P. & Dale, S. 2005: Frequency shift in homologue syllables of the Ortolan Bunting Emberiza hortulana. - Behavioural Processes 68-69-83.
38. Roche, J-C. 2003. Bird Songs and Calls of Britain and Europe. - WildSounds, Salthouse.
39. Schultze, A. & Dingier, K-H. 2007. The Bird Songs of Europe, North Africa and the Middle East. - Musikverlag Edition AMPLE, Germering.
40. Sherman, P. W., Reeve, H. K. & Pfennig, D. W. 1997: Recognition systems.-In Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach, 4th edn (ed. Krebs, J. R. and Davies, N. B.) : 9-96. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford
41. Stoddard, P. K. 1996: Vocal recognition of neighbors by territorial passerines. - In Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. (ed. Kroodsma, D. E. and Miller, E. H.) : 56-374. Cornell University Press, Ithaca N. Y.
42. Stoddard, P. K., Beecher, M. D., Horning, C. L. & Campbell, S. E. 1991: Recognition of individual neighbors by song in the song sparrow, a species with song repertoires. - Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 29-211-215.
43. Stoddard, P. K., Beecher, M. D., Horning, C. L. and Willis M. S. 1990: Strong neighbor-stranger discrimination in song sparrows. - Condor 92-1051-1056.
44. Tibbetts, E. A. & Dale, J. 2007: Individual recognition: it is good to be different. - Trends in Ecology and Evolution 22-529-537.
45. Wȩgrzyn, E. 2006: Individual differences and their function in the song of the great Reed Warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus. - Ph. D. thesis, University of Wroclaw, Wroclaw, Poland.
46. Wiley, R. H., Hatchwell, B. J. & Davies, N. B. 1991: Recognition of individual males songs by female dunnocks: a mechanism increasing the number of copulatory partners and reproductive success. - Ethology 88-145-153.