Predation of Bradysia sp. (Diptera: Sciaridae), Liriomyza trifolii (Diptera: Agromyzidae) and Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) by Coenosia attenuata (Diptera: Muscidae) in greenhouse crops

European Journal of Entomology

Volumn 106, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 199-204

  Tellez, Maria del Mar ^a   Tapia, Gervasio ^a   Gamez, Manuel ^b   Cabello, Tomas ^b   van Emden, Helmut F ^c  

^a IFAPA CENTRO EL TORUÑO   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALMERÍA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Agromyzidae; Aleyrodidae; Bemisia tabaci; Bradysia sp.; Coenosia attenuata; Diptera; Functional response; Greenhouse crops; Hemiptera; Liriomyza trifolii; Muscidae; Predator prey population dynamics; Sciaridae

Indexed keywords

CROP; FLY; FUNCTIONAL RESPONSE; GREENHOUSE ECOSYSTEM; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDATION; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION; SURVIVAL;

AGROMYZIDAE; ALEYRODIDAE; BEMISIA TABACI; BRADYSIA; COENOSIA ATTENUATA; CUCUMIS; DIPTERA; HEMIPTERA; LIRIOMYZA TRIFOLII; MUSCIDAE; NICOTIANA TABACUM; SCIARIDAE;

EID: 70049088172     PISSN: 12105759     EISSN: 18028829     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14411/eje.2009.025     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. BARDSLEY W.G. 2007: SIMFIT: Simulation, Fitting, Statistics and Plotting. Reference manual. University of Manchester, Manchester, 379 pp.
2. CABELLO T. & VARGAS P. 1988: Response of Trichogramma cordubensis Vargas and Cabello, and T. sp. nr. pintoi (Hym.: Trichogrammatidae) to different densities of alternative host eggs. In Voegele J., Waage J. & van Lenteren J. (eds): Trichogramma and Other Egg Parasites. INRA, Paris, pp. 165-172.
3. CABELLO T., GÁMEZ M. & VARGA Z. 2007: An improvement of the Holling type III functional response in entomophagous species model. J. Biol. Syst. 15: 515-524.
4. CIAMPOLINI M., FARNESI I. & MASSI E. 2005: Sciarid damage to rocket crops under cover. Inf. Agrar. 61: 71-73.
5. CHANDLER L.D. 1987: Evaluation on yellow trap sizes and within-field densities for monitoring Liriomyza trifolii in bell peppers. Southwest. Entomol. 12: 245-251.
6. COLOMBO M. & EÖRDEGH R. 1991: Ritrovamento de Coenosia attenuata, activo predatore in Liguiria e Lombardia. Inf. Agrar. 7: 197-189.
7. EKBOM B.S. & RUMEI X. 1990: Sampling and spatial patterns of whiteflieT. In Gerling D. (ed.): Whiteflies: their Bionomics, Pest Status and Management. Intercept, Newcastle, pp. 107-146.
8. ELZEN G.W., COLEMAN R.J. & KING E.G. 2003: Biological control by augmentation of natural enemies: Retrospect and prospect. In Koul O. & Dhaliwal G.S. (eds): Predators and Parasitoids. Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 41-63.
9. GARCÍA-MARTÍN M., GÁMEZ M. & CABELLO T. 2006: Estudio de respuesta funcional en sistemas parasitoide-huésped: Aplicación en lucha biológica contra plagas. Universidad de Almeria, Almeria, 152 pp.
10. GARCÍA-MARTÍN M., GÁMEZ M., TORRES-RUIZ A. & CABELLO T. 2008: Functional response of Chelonus oculator (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) to temperature, and its consequences to parasitism. Commun. Ecol. 9: 45-51.
11. GILIOLI G., BAUMGARTNER J. & VACANTE V. 2005: Temperature influences on functional response of Coenosia attenuata (Diptera: Muscidae) individuals. J. Econ. Entomol. 98: 1524-1530.
12. HAGEN K.S. 1987: Nutritional ecology of terrestrial predators. In Slansky F. & Rodriguez J.G. (eds): Nutritional Ecology of Insects, Mites, Spiders, and Related Invertebrates. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 533-577.
13. HASSELL M.P. 1978: The Dynamics of Arthropod Predator-Prey Systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 237 pp.
14. HAWKINS B.A. & CORNELL H.V. 1999: Theoretical Approaches to Biological Control. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 392 pp.
15. HENNING W. 1964: Family Muscidae. In Lindner E. (ed.): Die Fliegen der Paläarktischen Region. Vol. 63. Schweizerbart, Stuttgart, 1100 pp.
16. HOEBEKE E.R., SENSENBACH E.J., SANDERSON J.P. & WRAIGHT S. 2003: First report of Coenosia attenuatta Stein (Diptera: Muscidae), an Old World "Hunter Fly" in North America. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 105: 769-775.
17. JANDEL SCIENTIFIC 1994: Tablecurve 2D User's Manual. Jandel Co., San Rafael, CA, 404 pp.
18. JERVIS M. & KIDD N. 1996: Insect Natural Enemies. Chapman & Hall, London, 491 pp.
19. KINDLMANN P. & DIXON A.F.G. 2003: Insect predator-prey dynamics and the biological control of aphids by ladybirds. In VanDriesche R. (ed.): Proceedings of the International Symposium on Biological Control of Arthropods, Honolulu, June 2003. USDA Forest Service, Morgantown, WV, pp. 118-124.
20. KÜHNE S. 1998: OpeA rearing of generalist predators: a strategy for improvement of biological pest control in greenhouses. Phytoparasitica 26: 277-281.
21. KÜHNE S. 2000: Räuberische Fliegen der Gattung Coenosia Meigen, 1826 (Diptera: Muscidae) und die Möglichkeit ihres Einsatzes bei der biologischen Schädlingsbekämpfung. Stud. Dipt. (Suppl.) 9: 1-78.
22. MARTINEZ M. & COCQUEMPOT C. 2000: La mouche Coenosia attenuata nouvel auxiliare prometteur en culture protégée. PHM Rev. Hort. 414: 50-52.
23. MILLS N.J. 2001: Factors influencing top-down control of insect pest populations in biological control systems. Bas. Appl. Ecol. 2: 323-332.
24. MORECHI I. & COLOMBO M. 1999: Una metodica per l'allevamento dei Ditteri predatori Coenosia attenuata e C. strigipes. Inf. Fitopatol. 7-8: 61-64.
25. MOTULSKY H. & CHRISTOPOULOS A. 2003: Fitting Models to Biological Data Using Linear and Nonlinear Regression: A Practical Guide to Curve Fitting. GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, 351 pp.
26. PEKÁR S. 2005: Predatory characteristics of the ant-eating ZodarioP spiders (Araneae: Zodariidae): potential biological control agents. Biol. Control 34: 196-203.
27. POLH D., UYGUR F.N. & SAUERBORN J. 2003: Fluctuations in population of the first recorded predatory fly Coenosia attenuata in cotton fileds in Turkey. Phytoparasitica 31: 446-449.
28. PRIETO R., FIGUEIREDO E., MIRANDA C. & MEIXA A. 2003: Dípteros predadores do género Coenosia Meigen (Muscidae) em culturas hortícolas protegidas na regiäo Oeste. 6° Encontro Nacional de Protecçäo Integrada, Castelo Branco, May 2003, p. 331.
29. RODRIGUEZ M.D. & AGUILERA A. 2002: Coenosia attenuata, una nueva mosca a considerar en el control biológico de las plagas hortícolas. Phytom. Esp. 141: 27-34.
30. RODRIGUEZ M.D., TRUJILLO M.E. & APARICIO V. 2008: Producción integrada en Andalucia: Cultivos hortícolas protegidos. Phytom. Esp. 198: 24-28.
31. SABELI M.W. 1992. Predatory arthropods. In Crawley M.J. (ed.): Natural Enemies. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, pp. 225-264.
32. SENSENBACH E.J., SANDERSON J.P. & WRAIGHT S.P. 2004: Hunter flies: Good guys in the greenhouse. Growertalks 68: 85-86.
33. SIH A. 1987: PreAators and prey lifestyles: an evolutionary and ecological overview. In Kerfoot W.C. & Sih A. (eds): Predation: Direct and Indirect Impacts on Aquatic Communities. University Press of New England, Hanover, pp. 203-224.
34. SKIRVIN D.J. & FENLON J.S. 2001: Plant species modifies the functional response of Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) to TetranychuI urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae): implications for biological control. Bull. Entomol. Res. 91: 61-67.
35. SPSS 2006: SPSS Base User's Guide 15.0. SPSS Inc., Chicago, 618 pp.
36. TELLEZ M.M. 2003: Contribución a la mejora del control fitosanitario de dos especies de minadores, Liriomyza trifolii (Burgess) y Liriomyza bryoniae (Kaltenbach), (Diptera: Agromyzidae) en los cultivos de melón y tomate bajo plástico de la provincia de Almería. PhD thesis. University of Granada (Spain), 242 pp.
37. TELLEZ M.M. & TAPIA G. 2005: Presencia y distribución de Coenosia attenuata (Diptera: Muscidae), en las principales zonas de la Provincia de Almería. Bol. San. Veg. Plagas 31: 335-341.
38. TORRES M.M., APARICIO V., MANZANARES C. & RODRIGUEZ M.P. 2002: Producción integrada en cultivos hortícolas bajo abrigo. Andalucia: Criterios de intervención y métodos de control de agentes nocivos respetuosos con la salud de personas y medio ambiente. Phytom. Esp. 135: 156-163.
39. TOSTOWARYK W. 1972: The effect of prey-defense on the functional response of Podisus modestus (Hem.: Pentatomidae) to densities of the sawflies Neodiprion swainei and N. pratti banksianae (Hym.: Neodiprionidae). Can. Entomol. 104: 61-69.
40. TURKHEIMER F.E., HINZ R. & CUNNINGHAM V.J. 2003: On the undecidability among kinetic models: From model selection to model averaging. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Met. 23: 490-498.
41. WANG B. & FERRO D.N. 1998: Functional responses of Trichogramma ostriniae (Hym: Trichogrammatidae) to Ostrinia nubilalis (Lep: Pyralidae) under laboratory and field conditions. Environ. Entomol. 27: 752-758.