Phase uncertainty in case-control association studies

Genetic Epidemiology

Volumn 33, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 463-478

  Won, Sungho ^a   Kim, Sulgi ^b   Elston, Robert C ^b  

^a HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Haplotype phase; Linkage disequilibrium; Self replication

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; HAPLOTYPE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; POPULATION GENETICS; SIMULATION; UNCERTAINTY; VALIDITY;

ALLELES; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; DISEASE; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HAPLOTYPES; HUMANS; UNCERTAINTY;

EID: 69949166209     PISSN: 07410395     EISSN: 10982272     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.20399     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Collins A, Lau W. 2008. CHROMOSCAN: genome-wide association using a linkage disequilibrium map. J Hum Genet 53:121-126.
2. Excoffier L, Slatkin M. 1995. Maximum-likelihood estimation of molecular haplotype frequencies in a diploid population. Mol Biol Evol 12:921-927.
3. Fisher RA. 1950. Statistical Methods for Research Workers, 11th edition. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.
4. Lewontin RC. 1964. The interaction of selection and linkage. I. General considerations; heterotic models. Genetics 49:49-67.
5. Liptak T. 1958. On the combination of independent tests. Magy Tud Akad Mat Kutato' Int. Kouzl 3:171-197.
6. Nielsen DM, Ehm MG, Weir BS. 1998 Detecting marker-disease association by testing for Hardy-Weinberg disequilibrium at a marker locus. Am J Hum Genet 63:1531-1540.
7. Nielsen DM, Ehm MG, Zaykin DV, Weir BS. 2004. Effect of two- and three-locus linkage disequilibrium on the power to detect marker/ phenotype associations. Genetics 168:1029-1040.
8. S.A.G.E. 5.2. 2007. Statistical Analysis for Genetic Epidemiology. http://darwin.cwru.edu/sage/.
9. Sasieni PD. 1997. From genotypes to genes: doubling the sample size. Biometrics 53:1253-1261.
10. Song K, Elston RC. 2006. A powerful method of combining measures of association and Hardy-Weinberg disequilibrium for fine-mapping in case-control studies. Stat Med 25:105-126.
11. Van Steen K, McQueen MB, Herbert A, Raby B, Lyon H, DeMeo DL, Murphy A, Su J, Datta S, Rosenow C, Christman M, Silverman EK, Laird NM, Weiss ST, Lange C. 2005. Genomic screening and replication using the same data set in family-based association testing. Nat Genet 37:683-691.
12. Wang T, Zhu W, Elston RC. 2007. Improving power in contrasting linkage-disequilibrium patterns between cases and controls. Am J Hum Genet 80:911-920.
13. Weir BS. 1996. Genetic Data Analysis II. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
14. Wittke-Thompson JK, Pluzhnikov A, Cox NJ. 2005. Rational inferences about departures from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Am J Hum Genet 76:967-986.
15. Won S, Elston RC. 2008. The power of independent types of genetic information to detect association in a case-control study design. Genet Epidemiol 32:731-756.
16. Won S, Morris N, Lu Q, Elston RC. 2009. Choosing optimal method for combining p-values. Stat Med, submitted.
17. Zaykin DV. 2004. Bounds and normalization of the composite linkage disequilibrium coefficient. Genet Epidemiol 27:252-257.
18. Zaykin DV, Meng Z, Ehm MG. 2006. Contrasting linkage-disequilibrium patterns between cases and controls as a novel association-mapping method. Am J Hum Genet 78: 737-746.
19. Zheng G, Ng HK. 2008. Genetic model selection in two-phase analysis for case control association studies. Biostatistics 9: 391-399.
20. Zheng G, Song K, Elston RC. 2007. Adaptive two-stage analysis of genetic association in case-control designs. Hum Hered 63:175-186.