Friction dependence on growth conditions in epitaxial films

Langmuir

Volumn 25, Issue 17, 2009, Pages 9792-9796

  Murdaugh, Anne E ^a   Manne, Srinivas ^a  

^a University of Arizona   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANNEALING PROCESS; AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS; DRIVING FORCES; EPITAXIAL GROWTH SYSTEM; FORCE MICROSCOPY; GROWTH CONDITIONS; IN-SITU; LATERAL FORCE; SOLUTE CONCENTRATIONS; TIME DEPENDENT BEHAVIOR;

DEFECT DENSITY; EPITAXIAL GROWTH; FILM GROWTH; FRICTION; GROWTH KINETICS; METALLORGANIC VAPOR PHASE EPITAXY; MONOLAYERS; TRIBOLOGY;

EPITAXIAL FILMS;

EID: 69949163637     PISSN: 07437463     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/la9008448     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Krim, J. Surf. Sci. 2002, 500, 741-758.
2. Gnecco, E.; Bennewitz, R.; Gyalog, T.; Meyer, E. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2001, 13, R619-R642.
3. Tomlinson, G. A. Philos. Mag. 1929, 7, 905.
4. Binnig, G.; Quate, C. F.; Gerber, C. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1986, 56, 930-933.
5. Mate, C. M.; McClelland, G. M.; Erlandsson, R.; Chiang, S. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1987, 59, 1942-1945.
6. Harrison, J. A.; White, C. T.; Colton, R. J.; Brenner, D. W. Phys. Rev. B 1992, 46, 9700.
7. Carpick, R. W.; Salmeron, M. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 1163-1194.
8. Sokolov, I. Y. Tribol. Lett. 2002, 12, 131-134.
9. Hillner, P. E.; Gratz, A. J.; Manne, S.; Hansma, P. K. Geology 1992, 20, 359.
10. Dove, P. M.; Hochella, M. F. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1993, 57, 705.
11. Liang, Y.; Baer, D. R. Surf Sci. 1997, 373, 275.
12. Teng, H. H.; Dove, P. M.; Orme, C. A.; De Yoreo, J. J. Science 1998, 282, 724.
13. Pina, C. M.; Becker, U.; Risthaus, P.; Bosbach, D.; Putnis, A. Nature 1998, 395, 483.
14. Astilleros, J. M.; Pina, C. M.; Fernández-Díaz, L.; Putnis, A. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2000, 64, 2965.
15. Davis, K. J.; Dove, P. M.; De Yoreo, J. J. Science 2000, 290, 1134.
16. Hoffmann, U.; Stipp, S. L. S. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2001, 65, 4131.
17. Becker, U.; Gasharova, B. Phys. Chem. Miner. 2001, 28, 545.
18. Hay, M. B.; Workman, R. K.; Manne, S. Langmuir 2003, 19, 3727.
19. Lea, A. S.; Hurt, T. T.; El-Azab, A.; Amonette, J. E.; Baer, D. R. Surf. Sci. 2003, 524, 63.
20. Jun, Y. S.; Kendall, T. A.; Martin, S. T.; Friend, C. M.; Vlassak, J. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 1239.
21. Sánchez-Pastor, N.; Pina, C. M.; Astilleros, J. M.; Fernández-Díaz, L.; Putnis, A. Surf. Sci. 2005, 581, 225.
22. Shtukenberg, A. G.; Astilleros, J. M.; Putnis, A. Surf. Sci. 2005, 590, 212.
23. Murdaugh, A. E.; Liddelow, M.; Schmidt, A. M.; Manne, S. Langmuir 2007, 23, 5852-5856.
24. Higgins, S. R.; Hu, X. M.; Fenter, P. Langmuir 2007, 23, 8909-8915.
25. The dissolution and growth behavior of samples exposed to ultraviolet light showed no difference from earlier experiments in which the samples were not cured. The practice was put in place after occasional trouble with contaminated samples.
26. 4. See: Masson, M. R.; Lutz, H. D.; Engelen, B. In Sulfites, Selenites and Tellurites; Kertes, A. S., Ed.; Solubility Data Series; Pergamon Press: Oxford, U.K., 1986; Vol. 26, pp 187 and 241
27. Clever, H. L.; Johnston, F. J. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1980, 9, 751.
28. 3. For consistency in the β calculations, we will assume the anhydrous form. See: Arai, Y.; Yasue, T.; Nagata, N.; Shino, H. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1982, 55, 738-741.
29. 4, estimated from the differences in association free energies of the relevant ion pairs. In both systems, solutions undersaturated with respect to the solute material behave like supersaturated solutions at the foreign surface.
30. Higgins, S. R.; He, X. M. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2005, 69, 2085-2094.
31. Strickland-Constable, R. F. AIChE Symp. Ser. 1972, 68, 1-7.
32. Gong, J. R.; Lei, S. B.; Pan, G. B.; Wan, L. J.;Fan, Q. H.; Bai, C. L. Colloids Surf, A 2005, 257-58, 9-13.
33. Stabel, A.; Heinz, R.; Deschryver, F. C.; Rabe, J. P. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 505-507.
34. Samori, P.; Mullen, K.; Rabe, H. P. Adv. Mater. 2004, 16, 1761.
35. Tip wear sometimes led to a slow drift of the friction contrast over tens of minutes. However, this drift cannot explain the observed sudden changes in the overgrowth friction that correlate with the introduction of a more concentrated growth solution. Similarly, any sample wear effects would show a dependence on the time of exposure to scanning, leading to gradual changes within a single overgrowth zone. The observed results are, therefore, not consistent with wearrelated artifacts.
36. Putnis, A.; Juntarosso, J. L.; Hochella, M. F. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1995, 59, 4623-4632.
37. 2-, and (3) concentration-dependent polymorphicity in the solute film.
38. Ohnesorge, F.; Binnig, G. Science 1993, 260, 1451-1456.