Design parameters from in situ tests in soft ground - Recent developments

Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterization - Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Site Characterization, ISC'3

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 89-116

  Long, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHARACTERISATION; DESIGN PARAMETERS; GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS; IN-SITU; IN-SITU TEST; IN-SITU TESTING; MEASURED DATA; PRESSURE READING; PRESSUREMETERS; SHEAR WAVE VELOCITY; SOFT GROUND; SOFT SOILS;

ENGINEERS; GEOPHYSICS; SOIL TESTING; WAVE PROPAGATION;

SHEAR FLOW;

EID: 69949161474     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (130)

1. Baker, C.N. 2005. The use of the Ménard pressureme-ter in innovative foundation design from Chicago to Kuala Lumpur. Proc. ISP - Pressio 2005. 50 years of pressuremeters, Gambin, Magnan and Mested (eds.), VENPC/LCPC, Paris, 2: 63-102.
2. Bennert, T, Maher, A. and Gucunski, N. 2002. Evaluation of geotechnical design parameters using the seismic piezocone, New Jersey Department of Transportation, FHWA NJ 2001-032,2002.
3. Berry, K.M., Olson, S.M. and Lamie, M. 1998. Cone penetration testing in the Mid-Mississippi river valley. Proceedings of the 1st. International Conference on Geotechnical Site Characterization, ISC'1, Atlanta, 2: 983-987.
4. Boylan.N. and Long, M. 2006. Characterisation of peat using full flow penetrometers. In Proceedings 4th Int. Conf. on Soft Soil Engineering (ICSSE), Vancouver, October. Chan & Law (Eds.): 403-414. London: Taylor & Francis Group.
5. Boylan, N., Long, M., Ward, D., Barwise, A. and Georgious, B. 2007. Full flow penetrometer testing in Bothkennar clay". In Proceedings 6th International Conference, Society for Underwater Technology, Offshore Site Investigation and Geotechnics (SUT-OSIG), London, September: 177-186.
6. Boylan, N, Ward, D. and Long, M. 2008a. Characterisation of soft clay with a soil moisture probe (SMP). Proceedings 3rd International Conference on Site Characterisation (ISC'3), Taipei, April.
7. Boylan, N., Mathihssen, F., Long, M. and Molenkamp, F. 2008b. Cone penetration testing of organic soils. Proc. Baltic Geotechnical Conference, Gdansk, Poland, September.
8. Chenghou, Z., Greeuw, G., Jekel, J. and Rosenbrand, W. 1990. A new classification chart for soft soils using the piezocone. Engineering Geology, 29: 31-47. (Pubitemid 20730076)
9. Chin, C.-T, Chen J.-R., Hu, I.-C, Yao, D.T.C. and Chao, H-C. 2007. Engineering characteristics of Taipei clay. In Proceedings International Workshop on Characterisation and Engineering Properties of Natural Soils ("Natural Soils 2006"). NUS Singapore, December. Tan, T.S. et al. eds. 3: 1755-1804. London, Taylor and Francis.
10. Chung, S.F., Randolph, M.F. and Schneider, J.A. 2006. Effect of penetration rate on penetrometer resistance in clay. Jnl of Geotech and Geoenvironmental Eng., ASCE, 132(9): 1188-1196.
11. Crice, D. 2005. MASW, The wave of the future. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 10 (2): 77-79. (Pubitemid 40929787)
12. De Jong, J.T., Yafrate, N.J. and De Groot, D.J. 2007. Design of a miniature piezoprobe for high resolution stratigraphic profiling. ASTM Geotechnical Testing Journal, 30 (4).
13. mex for soft clay". In Proc 2nd. Int. Conf on Geotechnical Site Characterisation, ISC'2, Porto, September: 1:459-466. Rotterdam, MIT Press.
14. Einav, I. & Randolph, M.F. 2005. Combining upper bound and strain path methods for evaluating penetration resistance. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng, 63(14): 1991-2016. (Pubitemid 41087127)
15. Einav, I. & Randolph, M.F. 2006. Effect of strain rate on mobilized strength and thickness of curved shear bands. Géotechnique, 56(7): 504-510.
16. ENISO 22476-1. 2005. Geotechnical investigation and testing - Field testing - Part 1: Electrical cone and piezocone penetration tests. Geneva: ISO / CEN.
17. Eslami, A. and Fellenius, B.H. 1997. Pile capacity by direct CPT and CPTU methods. Can Geo. Jnl. 24 (6): 880-898.
18. Fahey, M. 1998. Deformation and in situ stress measurement. In Proceedings First International Conference on Geotechnical Site Characterisation, Atlanta (eds. Robertson and Mayne). 1: 49-68. Rotterdam, Balkema.
19. Fellenius, B.H. and Eslami, A. 2000. Soil profile interpreted from CPTU data. Year 2000 Geotechnics, Geotechnical Engineering Conference, AIT, Bangkok, Nov. 18p.
20. Gardiner, R. 2005. Moisture monitored. Ground Engineering, February: 22-23.
21. Gaudin, C, Cassidy, M.J. and Donovan, T. 2007. Spudcan reinstallation near existing footprints. In Proceedings 6th International Conference, Society for Underwater Technology, Offshore Site Investigation and Geotechnics (SUT-OSIG), London, September: 285-292.
22. Greenhouse, J., Pehme, P., Coulter, D. andYarie, Q. 1998. Trends in geophysical site characterization. In Proceedings First International Conference on Geotechnical Site Characterisation, Atlanta (eds. Robertson and Mayne). 1: 23-34. Rotterdam, Balkema.
23. Hamza, M.M., Shmahien, M.M. and Ibrahim, M.H. 2005. Characterisation and undrained shear strength of Nile delta soft deposits using piezocone. In Proc. 16th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical engineering, Osaka, September, Vol. 2.
24. Hawkins, A.B., Larnach, W.J., Lloyd, I.M. and Nash, D.F.T. 1989. Selecting the location and the initial investigation of the SERC soft clay test bed site. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology, 22(4): 281-316.
25. Heisey, J.S., Stokoe, K.H and Meyer, A.H. 1982. Moduli of pavement systems from Spectral Analysis of Surface Waves. Transportation Research Record, 852:22-31. Washington D.C.
26. Hepton, P. 1988. Shear wave velocity measurements during penetration testing. In Proceedings Penetration testing in the UK. Geotechnology Conference, Birmingham, July: 275-278. London, Thomas Telford.
27. Hight, D.W, Paul, M.A, Barras, B.F, Powell, J.J.M, Nash, D.F.T, Smith, P.R, Jardine, R.J and Edwards, D.H. 2003. Characterisation of the Bothkennar clay. In Proceedings International Workshop on Characterisation and Engineering Properties of Natural Soils ("Natural Soils 2002"). NUS Singapore, December. Tan, T.S. et al. eds. 2: 543-597.
28. Hope, VS., Clayton, C.R.I, and Butcher, A.P. 1999. In situ determination of Ghh at Bothkennar using a novel seismic method Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology. 32(2): 97-105. (Pubitemid 30138214)
29. Houlsby, G.T. 1998. Advanced interpretation of field tests. In Proceedings First International Conference on Geotechnical Site Characterisation, Atlanta (eds. Robertson and Mayne). 1: 99-114. Rotterdam, Balkema.
30. Huang, A.B., Pan, Y.W, Wang, C.H., Liao, J.J and Hsieh, S.Y. 1999. Pressuremeter tests in poorly cemented weak rocks. 37th US Rock Mechanics Symposium, Balkema, 1: 247-252.
31. Huang, A.B. and Hsueh, C.K. 2005. Pressuremeter tests in Taiwan. Proc. ISP-Pressio 2005. 50 years of pressuremeters, Gambin, Magnan and Mested (eds.), I'ENPCILCPC, Paris, 2: 369-374.
32. International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, ISSMGE. 1999. International reference test procedure for the CPTU. In Proceedings XIIth ECSMFE, Amsterdam. Rotterdam, Balkema.
33. International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, ISSMGE. 2001. The flat dilatome-ter test for soil investigations. Report of the ISSMGE TC16, In Proceedings International Conference on In Situ Measurement of Soil Properties and Case Histories, In Situ 2001. (Rahardjo and Lunne eds.). Bali, Indonesia.
34. International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) (2003) ISO/WD 22476-9, 2003: Geotechnical investigation and testing - Field testing - Part 9: Field vane test. Geneva ISO.
35. Jacobs, P.A. and Courts, J.S. 1992. Comparison of electric piezocone tips at the Bothkennar test site. Géotechnique, 42(2): 369-375. (Pubitemid 23371886)
36. Jamiolkowski, M and Lo Presti, D.C.F. 1994. Validity of in situ tests related to real behaviour. In Proceedings XIII ICSMFE, New Delhi, 5: 51-55. New Delhi: Oxford Publishing.
37. Jeffries, M.G. and Davies, M.P. 1991. Discussion on Robertson (1990) - Soil classification by the cone penetration test. Can. Geo. Jnl, 28: 173-176.
38. Jones, R. 1958. In-situ measurements of the dynamic properties of soil by vibration methods. Géotechnique, 8(1): 1-21.
39. Jones, G. A. and Rust, E. 1982. Piezometer penetration testing CUPT. Proc. 2nd European Symposium on Penetration Testing, ESOPT-2, Amsterdam, 2: 607-614.
40. Kallstenius, T. 1961. Development of two modern continuous sounding methods. Proc.5th ICSMFE, Paris, 1: 475-480
41. Karlsrud, K., Lunne, T, Kort, D.A. and Strandvik, S. 2005. CPTU correlations for clays. In Proc. 16th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical engineering, Osaka, September, 2: 693-702.
42. Kelleher, P.J. and Randolph, M.F. 2005. Seabed geotechnical characterisation with a ball penetrometer deployed from the Portable Remotely Operated Drill. In Proc, Int. Symp. on Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics (ISFOG), Perth, Australia: 365-371.
43. Lacasse, S. and Lunne, T. 1982. Dilatometer tests in two soft marine clays. In Proceedings on Updating Subsurface Sampling of Soils and Rocks and their In Situ Testing, Santa Barbara, California, January.
44. Larsson, R. and Mulabdić, M. 1991a. Shear moduli in Scandinavian clays. Swedish Geotechnical Institute Report No. 40, Linköping.
45. Larsson, R. and Mulabdić, M. 1991b. Piezocone tests in clay. Swedish Geotechnical Institute Report No. 42, Linköping.
46. Long, M. and Gudjonsson, G. 2004. T-bar testing in Irish soft soils. In Proc 2nd. Int. Conf on Geotechnical Site Characterisation, ISC'2, Porto, September: 1: 719-726. Rotterdam, MIT Press.
47. Long, M. and Gudjonsson, G. 2005. FoU - prosjekt. Param-eterbestemmelser for siltige materialer. Delrapport C. Interpretative Report. Statens Vegvesen Intern Rapport Nr. 2383, October 2005.
48. Long, M and Donohue, S. 2007. In situ shear wave velocity from multichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW) tests at eight Norwegian research sites. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 44 (5): 533-544. (Pubitemid 47241546)
49. Long, M. 2007. Engineering characterisation of estuarine silts. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology (QJEGH), 40: 147-161.
50. Long, M., Boylan, N. and O'Connor, S. 2007. The application of CPTU to soft soils and alternative techniques. In Proceedings SGE - 2007, Soft Ground Engineering Conference, Athlone, Ireland, February 2007, ISBN 1 898 012 83 0, paper 1.1.
51. Lo Presti, D.C.F., Jamiolkowski, M. and Pepe, M. 2003. Geotechnical characterization of the subsoil of Pisa Tower. In Proceedings International Workshop on Characterisation and Engineering Properties of Natural Soils ("Natural Soils 2002"). NUS Singapore, December. Tan, T.S. et al. eds. 2: 909-946.
52. Low, H.E., Randolph, M.F. and Kelleher, R Comparison of pore pressure generation and dissipation rates from cone and ball penetrometers. In Proceedings 6th International Conference, Society for Underwater Technology, Offshore Site Investigation and Geotechnics (SUT-OSIG), London, September: 177-186.
53. Lukas, R.G. 2005. The pressuremeter in consulting engineering practice in the USA. Proc. ISP-Pressio 2005.50 years of pressuremeters, Gambin, Magnan and Mested (eds.), I'ENPC/LCPC, Paris, 2: 329-336.
54. Lunne, T, Eidsmoen, T, Gillespie, D. and Howland, J.D. 1986. Laboratory and field evaluation of cone penetrometers. Proceedings of the ASCE Specialty Conference In Situ '86: Use of In Situ Tests in Geotechnical Engineering, Blacksburg, American Society of Civil Engineers: 714-729. (Pubitemid 16618085)
55. Lunne, T, Lacasse, S. and Rad, N.S. 1989. General report/Discussion session 2: SPT, CPT, pressuremeter testing and recent developments in situ testing - Part 1: All tests except SPT, In Proceedings XIIICSMFE, Rio de Janeiro, 4:2339-2403. Rotterdam, Balkema.
56. Lunne, T, Robertson, P.K and Powell, J. J.M. 1997. Cone penetration testing in geotechnical practice. London: Spon Press.
57. Lunne, T. 2001. In situ testing in offshore geotechnical investigations. In Proceedings International Conference on In Situ Measurement of Soil Properties and Case Histories, In Situ 2001. (Rahardjo and Lunne eds.). Bali, Indonesia: 61-78.
58. Lunne, T, Long, M. and Forsberg, C.F. 2003a. Characterisation and engineering properties of Onsoy clay. In Proceedings International Workshop on Characterisation and Engineering Properties of Natural Soils ("Natural Soils 2002"). NUS Singapore, December. Eds. Tan, T.S. etal. Published by Balkema, 1: 395-428.
59. Lunne, T, Long, M. and Forsberg, C.F. 2003b. Characterisation and engineering properties of Holmen, Drammen sand. In Proceedings International Workshop on Characterisation and Engineering Properties of Natural Soils ("Natural Soils 2002"). NUS Singapore, December. Eds. Tan, T.S. et al. Published by Balkema, 2: 1121-1148.
60. Lunne, T. 2005. Personal communication to author.
61. Lunne, T, Randolph, M.F, Chung, S.F., Andersen, K.H., and Sjursen, M. 2005. Comparison of cone and T-bar factors in two onshore and one offshore clay sediments. In Proc, Int. Symp. on Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics (ISFOG), Perth, Australia: 981-989.
62. Lunne, T, Berre, T, Andersen, K.H., Strandvik, S. and Sjursen, M. 2006. Effects of sample disturbance on measured shear strength of soft marine Norwegian clays. Canadian Geotechnical Journal. 43: 726-750. (Pubitemid 44275667)
63. Lunne, T. and Andersen, K.H. 2007. Soft clay shear strength parameters for deepwater geotechnical design. In Proceedings 6th International Conference, Society for Underwater Technology, Offshore Site Investigation and Geotechnics (SUT-OSIG), London, September: 151-176.
64. Lunne, T. and Powell, J.J.M. 2008. Comparative testing of piezocones at the Onsoy test site in Norway. Submitted for publication.
65. Marsland, A. and Randolph, M.F. 1978. A study of the variation and effects of water pressures in the pervious strata underlying Crayford Marshes. Géotechnique, 28(4): 435-464. (Pubitemid 9402782)
66. Mathews, M.C., Hope, VS. and Clayton, C.R.I. 1996. The use of surface waves in the determination of ground stiffness profiles. Proc. Institution of Civil Engineers Geotechnical. Engineering, 119 (Apr.): 84-95. (Pubitemid 26478063)
67. Marchetti, S. 1980. In Situ Tests by Flat Dilatometer. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 106 (GT3): 299-321. (Pubitemid 10437318)
68. Marchetti, S. 1980. In Situ Tests by Flat Dilatometer; closure to discussion. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 107 (GT6): 832-837.
69. Marchetti, S. and Crapps, D.K. 1981. Flat dilatometer manual. Internal Report of G.P.E. Inc.
70. Marchetti, S., Monaco, P., Totani, G. and Marchetti, D. 2008. In situ tests by seismic dilatometer. From Research to Practice in Geotechnical Engineering, A Geotechnical Special Publication Honoring John H. Schmertmann, ASCE Geolnstitute.
71. Martin, CM. and Randolph, M.F. 2006. Upper-bound analysis of lateral pile capacity in cohesive soil. Géotechnique, 56(2): 141-145.
72. Mayne, P.W., Robertson, P.K. and Lunne, T. 1998. Clay stress history evaluated from seismic piezocone tests. In Proceedings of the 1st. International Conference on Geotechnical Site Characterization, ISC'1, Atlanta, 2: 1113-1118.
73. Mayne, P.W. 2001. Stress-strain-strength-flow parameters from enhanced in situ tests. In Proceedings International Conference on In Situ Measurement of Soil Properties and Case Histories, In Situ 2001. (Rahardjo and Lunne eds.). Bali, Indonesia: 27-48.
74. Mayne, P.W. 2007. In situ test calibrations for evaluating soil parameters. In Proceedings International Workshop on Characterisation and Engineering Properties of Natural Soils ("Natural Soils 2006"). NUS Singapore, December. Tan, T.S. et al. eds. 3: 1601-1652. London, Taylor and Francis.
75. Mlynarek, Z., Gogolik, S., Marchetti, S. and Marchetti, D. 2006. Suitability of SDMT test to assess geotechnical parameters of post - flotation sediment. In Proceedings of 2nd International Flat Dilatometer Conference: 148-153. Washington DC, June.
76. Mollé, J. 2005. The accuracy of the interpretation of CPT-based soil classification methods for soft soils. MSc Thesis Section for Engineering Geology, Department of Applied Earth Sciences, Delft University of Technology. Memoirs of the Centre of Engineering Geology in the Netherlands, No. 242. Report AES/IG/05-25, December.
77. Monaco, P. and Marchetti, S. 2007. Evaluating liquefaction potential by seismic dilatometer (SDMT) accounting for aging and stress history. In Proceedings 4th International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, ICEGE Thessaloniki, Greece, June, Paper 1626.
78. Monnet, J., Allagnat, D., Teston, J., Billet, P. and Baguelin, F. 2006. Foundation design for a large arch bridge on alluvial soils. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng., Geotech Eng., 159, 1: 19-28, Thomas Telford, London. (Pubitemid 43333325)
79. Nash, D.F.T., Lings, M.L., Benahmed, N., Sukolrat, J. and Muir Wood, D. 2006. The effects of controlled destructur-ing on the small strain shear stiffness Go of Bothkennar clay. In The Tatsuoka Geotechnical Symposium. Rome.
80. Nazarian, S. and Stokoe, K.H. 1984. In situ shear wave velocities from spectral analysis of surface waves. In Proceedings 8th world conf. on earthquake engineering. 3: 31-38.
81. Olsen, R.S. and Mitchell, J.K. 1995. CPT stress normalisation and prediction of soil classification. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing, CPT'95, Lingköping, Sweden, Swedish Geotechnical Society, 2: 257-262.
82. Park, C.B., Miller, D.M., and Xia, J. 1999. Multichannel Analysis of surface waves. Geophysics, 64 (3): 800-808. (Pubitemid 29511461)
83. Peuchen, J., Adrichem, J. and Hefer, P.A. 2005. Practice notes on push-in penetrometers for offshore geotechnical investigation. In Proc, Int. Symp. on Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics (ISFOG), Perth, Australia: 973-979.
84. Peuchen, J. and Mayne, P. 2007. Rate effects in vane shear testing. In Proceedings 6th International Conference, Society for Underwater Technology, Offshore Site Investigation and Geotechnics (SUT-OSIG): 259-266. London, September: 187-194.
85. Pijpers, B. 2002. Sonderen, van Begemann tot Hryciw, een drieluik over de interpretatie van sonderingen, twee 'spe-ciale' milieusondes en de camerasonde. GeoDelft Internal Report.
86. Powell, J.J.M., Quarterman, R.S.T. and Lunne, T. 1988. Interpretation and use of the piezocone test in UK clays, Proc. Penetration testing in the UK, Thomas Telford, London: 51-156.
87. Powell, J. J.M. and Butcher, A.P. 1991. Assessment of ground stiffness from field and laboratory tests. In Proceedings Xth ECSMFE, Fierenze. 1: 153-156. Rotterdam, Balkema. (Pubitemid 21725701)
88. Powell, J.J.M. and Shields, C.H. 1995. Field studies of the full displacement pressuremeter in clays. In Proc. 4th Int. Symposium on Pressuremeters (ISP4), Sherbrooke, Canada, 239-248.
89. Powell, 2001. In situ testing and its value in characterising the UK National soft clay testbed site, Bothkennar. In Proceedings International Conference on In Situ Measurement of Soil Properties and Case Histories, In Situ 2001. (Rahardjo and Lunne eds.) Bali, Indonesia.
90. Powell, J.J.M. 2005. Technical session lc: In situ testing. In Proc. 16th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical engineering, Osaka, September, Gen Reps. Vol.: 51-61.
91. Powell, J.J.M., Shields, C.H., Frank, R., Dupla, J.-C. and Mokkelbost, K.H. 2005. A cone pressuremeter method for design of axially loaded piles in clay soils. Proc. ISP - Pressio 2005. 50 years of pressuremeters, Gambin, Magnan and Mested (eds.), I'ENPC/LCPC, Paris, 1: 547-561.
92. Powell, J.J.M. and Lunne, T. 2005. A comparison of different sized piezocones in UK clays. In Proc. 16th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical engineering, Osaka, September, 1: 729-734.
93. Ramsey, N. 2002. A calibrated model for the interpretation of cone penetration tests (CPT's) in North Sea Quaternary soils. Proc. Int. Conf. Offshore SI and Géotechnics, SUT 2002, London, Nov.: 341-356.
94. Randolph, M.F. and Houlsby, G. 1984. The limiting pressure on a circular pile loaded laterally in cohesive soil. Géotechnique, 34 (4): 613-623. (Pubitemid 15436216)
95. Randolph, M.F., Hefer, P.A., Geise, J.M. and Watson, P.G. 1998. Improved seabed strength profiling using T-bar penetrometer. In Proc. Int. Conf. Offshore Site Investigation and Foundation Behaviour, SUT, London: 221-236.
96. Randolph, M.F, Martin, CM. Hu, Y. 2000. Limiting resistance of a spherical penetrometer in cohesive material. Géotechnique, 50(5), pp. 573-582.
97. Randolph, M.F. 2004. Characterisation of soft sediments for offshore applications. In Proc. of 2nd Int. Conf. on Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterization -ISC'2, Porto, 1: 209-232. Rotterdam, MIT Press.
98. Randolph, M.F, Cassidy, M., Gourvenec, S. and Ebrich, C. 2005. Challenges of offshore geotechnical engineering. In Proc. 16th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical engineering, Osaka, September, 2: 123-133.
99. Randolph, M.F. Anderson, K.H. 2006. Numerical Analysis of T-bar Penetration in soft clay. Int. J. Geomechanics, ASCE, 6(6): 411-420. (Pubitemid 44768344)
100. Randolph, M.F., Low, H.E. and Zhou, H. 2007. In situ testing for the design of pipelines and anchoring systems. In Proceedings 6th International Conference, Society for Underwater Technology, Offshore Site Investigation and Geotechnics (SUT-OSIG), London, September: 251-262.
101. Reiffsteck, P. 2005. Bearing capacity and settlement of a deep foundation - presentation of the results of the prediction exercises. Proc. ISP - Pressio 2005. 50 years of pressuremeters, Gambin, Magnan and Mested (eds.), VENPC/LCPC, Paris 2: 521-536.
102. Robertson, P.K., Campanella, R.G., Gillespie, D. and Greig, J. 1986. Use ofpiezometer cone data. In Proc. ASCE Speciality Conf. In Situ '86: Use of In Situ Tests in Geotechnical Engineering, Blacksburg: 1263-1280.
103. Robertson, P.K. 1990. Soil classification using the cone penetration test. Can Geo. Jnl., 27(1): 151-158. (Pubitemid 20684908)
104. Robertson, P.K., Sasitharan, S., Cunning, J.C and Segs, D.C 1995. Shear wave velocity to evaluate flow liquefaction. Journal of Geo. Eng., ASCE, 121 (3): 262-273.
105. Robertson, P.K. 2004. Evaluating soil liquefaction and post-earthquake deformations using the CPT. In Proc. of 2nd Int. Conf. on Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterization -ISC'2, Porto, 1: 233-252. Rotterdam, MIT Press.
106. Sandven, R. 1990. Strength and deformation properties of fine grained soils obtained from piezocone tests. PhD thesis NTH, Trondheim.
107. Sandven, R.B. and Sjursen, M. 1998. Sample disturbance in soils - results from an overconsolidated marine clay. In Proc. 1st Int. Conf. On Site Characterisation - ISC '98, Atlanta, 1:409-417.
108. Schmertmann, J.H. 1978. Guidelines for cone tests, performance and design. Federal Highway Administration, Report FHWA-TS-78209, Washington, 145p.
109. Schnaid, E, Lehane, B.M. and Fahey, M. 2004. In situ test characterization of unusual geomaterials. In Proc. of 2nd Int. Conf. on Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterization-ISC'2, Porto, 1:49-74. Rotterdam, MIT Press.
110. Schnaid, F. 2005. Geo-characterisation and properties of natural soils by in situ tests. In Proceedings XVIICSMGE, Osaka, 1: 3-45. Rotterdam: MIT Press.
111. Schneider, J.A., Randolph, M.F., Mayne, P.W. and Ramsey, N. 2008. Influence of partial consolidation during penetration on normalised soil classification by piezocone. Proceedings 3rd International Conference on Site Characterisation (ISC'3), Taipei, April.
112. Senneset, K., Sandven, R. and Janbu, N. 1989. The evaluation of soil parameters from piezocone tests. In Proc. Research Council, Trans. Research Board, In Situ Testing of Soil Properties for Transportation Facilities, Washington D.C.
113. Soccodato, F.M. 2003. Geotechnical properties of Fucino clayey soil. In Proceedings International Workshop on Characterisation and Engineering Properties of Natural Soils ("Natural Soils 2002 "). NUS Singapore, December. Tan, T.S. et al. .eds. ,1:791-807, Rotterdam, Balkema.
114. Sukolrat, J. 2007. Structure and destructuration of Bothkennar clay. PhD Thesis, University of Bristol.
115. Stewart, D.P. and Randolph, M.F. 1991. A new site investigation tool for the centrifuge. Proc. Int. Conf. on Centrifuge Modelling Centrifuge 91, Boulder Colorado: 531-538.
116. Stewart, D.P. and Randolph, M.F. 1994. T-bar penetration testing in soft clay. ASCE Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 120(12): 2230-2235.
117. Stokoe, K.H. II, Joh, S-H and Woods, R.D. 2004. The contributions of in situ geophysical measurement to solving geotechnical engineering problems. In Proc. of 2nd Int. Conf on Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterization -ISC'2, Porto, 1: 97-132. Rotterdam, MIT Press.
118. Sutton, J.A. 1999. Engineering seismic geophysics at Bothkennar. M.Phil Thesis. University of Surrey.
119. Tatsuoka, F., Jardine, R. J., Lo Presti, D., DiBenedetto, H. and Kodaka, T. 1997. Theme lecture: Characterising the jjre-failure deformation properties of geomaterials. Proc. 14th ICSMFE Hamburg, 4: 2129-2175.
120. Teh, K.L., Leung, C.F. and Chow, Y.K. 2007. Some considerations for predicting spudcan penetration resistance in two layered soil using miniature penetrometer. In Proceedings 6th International Conference, Society for Underwater Technology, Offshore Site Investigation and Geotechnics (SUT-OSIG), London, September: 279-284.
121. Tokimatsu, K., Kuwayama, S., Tamura, S. and Miyadera, Y. 1991. Vs determination from steady state Rayleigh wave method. Soils and Foundations, 31(2): 153-163. (Pubitemid 21697789)
122. Watson, P.G., Newson, T.A. and Randolph, M.F. 1998. Strength profiling in soft offshore soils. In Proc. 1st Int. Conf. On Site Characterisation - ISC '98, Atlanta, 2: 1389-1394.
123. Watson, P.G. and Humpheson, C. 2007. Foundation design and installation of the Yolla A platform. In Proceedings 6th International Conference, Society for Underwater Technology, Offshore Site Investigation and Geotechnics (SUT-OSIG), London, September: 399-412.
124. Weemees, I, Howie, J., Woeller D., Sharp, J., Cargill, E. and Greig, J. 2006. Improved techniques for in situ determination of undrained shear strength in soft clays. In Proc. Sea to Sky Geotechnics: 89-95.
125. Yafrate, N.J. and DeJong, J.T. 2005. Considerations in evaluating the remoulded undrained shear strength from full flow penetrometer cycling. In Proc, Int. Symp. on Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics (ISFOG), Perth, Australia: 991-997.
126. Yafrate, N.J. and DeJong, J.T. 2006. Interpretation of sensitivity and remoulded undrained shear strength with full flow penetrometers. In Proc. Conference of Int. Soc. For Offshore and Polar Engineering (ISOPE-06), San Francisco: 572-577. (Pubitemid 350204387)
127. Yafrate, N.J., DeJong, J.T. and DeGroot, D.J. 2007. The influence of full flow penetrometer area ratio on penetration resistance and undrained and remoulded shear strength. In Proceedings 6th International Conference, Society for Underwater Technology, Offshore Site Investigation and Geotechnics (SUT-OSIG), London, September: 461-468.
128. Whittle, A.J., Sutabutr, X, Germaine, J.T. and Varney, A. 2001a. Prediction and interpretation of pore pressure dissipation of a tapered piezoprobe. Geotechnique, 51, 7: 601-617. (Pubitemid 34463851)
129. Whittle, A.J., Sutabutr, T, Germaine, J.T. and Varney, A. 2001a. Prediction and measurement of pore pressure dissipation for a tapered piezoprobe. Proc. Offshore Technology Conf, Houston, Paper 13155.
130. Yu, H.-S. 2004. In situ soil testing: from mechanics to interpretation. In Proc.of 2nd lnt. Conf. on Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterization-ISC'2, Porto, 1:3-38. Rotterdam, MIT Press.