A tool for the nonparametric characterization of the geometry of spectra in hyperspace

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

Volumn 7334, Issue , 2009, Pages

  Resmini, Ronald G ^a  

^a National Geospatial Intelligence Agency   (United States)

Author keywords

Box counting; Dimensionality; Fractal dimension; HSI; Hyperspace; Hyperspectral imagery; LWIR; VNIR SWIR

Indexed keywords

BOX COUNTING; DIMENSIONALITY; HSI; HYPERSPACE; HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGERY; LWIR; VNIR/SWIR;

ALGORITHMS; FRACTAL DIMENSION; PARTIAL DISCHARGES; REMOTE SENSING;

SET THEORY;

EID: 69949160775     PISSN: 0277786X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.819312     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. Resmini, R.G., 2003. The categorization of hyperspectral information (HSI) based on the distribution of spectra in hyperspace. Proceedings of the SPIE, Algorithms and Technologies for Multispectral, Hyperspectral, and Ultraspectral Imagery IX, S.S. Shen and P.E. Lewis, eds., Orlando, FLa., April 21-25, v. 5093, doi: 10.1117/12.486731, pp. 581-590.
2. Resmini, R.G., 2006. Towards an alternative method of characterizing the distribution of spectra in hyperspace. Presented at the 2006 annual meeting of the IEEE IGARSS, Denver, Colo. (http://www.igarss06.com/final-program.pdf). Briefing available upon request.
3. Haile, J.M., (1997). Molecular Dynamics Simulation, Elementary Methods. Wiley Professional Paperback Series, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 489 p.
4. The program is written in C but compiled with a C++ compiler; hence the '.cpp' filename extension.
5. An additional control loop was inserted into BoxCount4.cpp to create FractDim1.cpp. BoxCount4.cpp generates one discretization of hyperspace based on a user specified box edge dimension. FractDim1.cpp automatically generates many discretizations by changing box edge dimension with each iteration.
6. http://mason.gmu.edu/~rresmini/pubs1.html.
7. http://www.borland.com/.
8. http://www.ittvis.com/envi/.
9. Atmospheric correction applied by NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL).
10. NASA AVIRIS: http://aviris.jpl.nasa.gov/.
11. AVIRIS normally has 224 bands; bands in the atmospheric water vapor regions were omitted for this study. The data sets analyzed contain 300 samples, 250 lines, and 180 bands.
12. The Mormon Mesa SEBASS data set is provided by The Aerospace Corporation, by John Hackwell, Eric Keim, and Laurel Kirkland.
13. Kirkland, L.E., K.C. Herr, E.R. Keim, P.M. Adams, J. W. Salisbury, J.A. Hackwell, A. Treiman, (2002). First use of an airborne thermal infrared hyperspectral scanner for compositional mapping. Remote Sens. Environ., v. 80, pp. 447-459.
14. SEBASS normally has 128 bands; one band was omitted for this study. The data set analyzed contains 128 samples, 2000 lines, and 127 bands.
15. Richards, J.A., and Jia, X., (1999). Remote Sensing Digital Analysis, An Introduction. 3rd, Revised and Enlarged Edition, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 363 p.
16. Baker, G.L, and Gollub, J.P., (1990). Chaotic Dynamics: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1st ed., 182 p.
17. Camastra, F., and Vinciarelli, A., (2002). Estimating the intrinsic dimension of data with a fractal-based method. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, v. 24, pp. 1404-1407.
18. Chen, W.-S., Yuan, S.-Y., and Hsieh, C.-M., (2003). Two algorithms to estimate fractal dimension of gray-level images. Optical Engineering, v. 42, no.8, pp. 2452-2464, (August 2003).
19. Grassberger, P., and Procaccia, I., (1983). Characterization of strange attractors. Physical Review Letters, v. 50, pp. 346-349.
20. Hergarten, S., (2002). Self-Organized Criticality in Earth Systems. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 272 p.
21. Rietman, E., (1989). Exploring the Geometry of Nature. Computer Modeling of Chaos, Fractals, Cellular Automata and Neural Networks. Windcrest Books, publ., a division of TAB Books, Inc., Blue Ridge Summit, PA, 1st ed., 197 p.
22. Sun, W., Xu, G., Gong, P., and Liang, S., (2006). Fractal analysis of remotely sensed images: a review of methods and applications. Int. J. Rem. Sens., v. 27, no.22, pp. 4963-4990.
23. Theiler, J., (1990). Estimating fractal dimension. J. Opt. Soc. Am., v. 7, pp. 1055-1073.
24. Turcotte, D.L., (1992). Fractals and Chaos in Geology and Geophysics. Cambridge University Press, 221 p.
25. Umaña-Díaz, A., and Velez-Réyes, M., (2003). Determining the dimensionality of hyperspectral imagery for unsupervised band selection. In: Algorithms and Technologies for Multispectral, Hyperspectral, and Ultraspectral Imagery IX, S.S. Shen, P.E. Lewis, eds., Proc. of the SPIE, v. 5093, pp. 70-81.
26. Chang, C.-I., (2006). Exploration of virtual dimensionality in hyperspectral image analysis. Algorithms and Technologies for Multispectral, Hyperspectral, and Ultraspectral Imagery XII, Shen, S.S., and Lewis, P.E., eds., Proceedings of the SPIE, v. 6233, 12 pp., doi: 10.1117/12.665280. (Pubitemid 44385934)
27. Chang, C.-I., (2003). Hyperspectral Imaging. Techniques for Spectral Detection and Classification. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, 370 p.
28. Schlamm, A., Messinger, D., and Basener, W., (2008). Geometric estimation of the inherent dimensionality of a single material cluster in multi- and hyperspectral imagery. Algorithms and Technologies for Multispectral, Hyperspectral, and Ultraspectral Imagery XIV, Proceedings of the SPIE, Shen, S.S. and Lewis, P.E., eds., v. 6966, 10 p., doi: 10.1117/12.776903.
29. Basener, W., Ientilucci, E.J., and Messinger, D.W., (2007). Anomaly detection using topology. Algorithms and Technologies for Multispectral, Hyperspectral, and Ultraspectral Imagery XIII, Proceedings of the SPIE, Shen, S.S. and Lewis, P.E., eds., v. 6565, 10 p., doi: 10.1117/12.745429. (Pubitemid 350070131)
30. Bachmann, C.M., Ainsworth, T.L., and Fusina, R.A., (2006). Improved manifold coordinate representations of large-scale hyperspectral scenes. IEEE Trans. on Geoscience and Rem. Sens., v. 44, no.10, pp. 2786-2803.
31. Bernhardt, M., Heather, J., and Watkins, O., (2006). Hyperspectral clutter statistics, generative models and anomaly detection. In: Algorithms and Technologies for Multispectral, Hyperspectral, and Ultraspectral Imagery XII, S.S. Shen, P.E. Lewis, eds., Proc. of the SPIE, v. 6233, pp. 623321-1 to 623321-11, CD-ROM, doi: 10.1117/12.665652. (Pubitemid 44385968)
32. Meidunas, E.C., and Gustafson, S.C., (2006). Johnson distribution models of hyperspectral image data clusters. In: Algorithms and Technologies for Multispectral, Hyperspectral, and Ultraspectral Imagery XII, S.S. Shen, P.E. Lewis, eds., Proc. of the SPIE, v. 6233, pp. 623322-1 to 623321-13, CD-ROM, doi: 10.1117/12.663965. (Pubitemid 44385969)
33. Goffe, W.L., (1999). Visualizing multi-dimensional functions in economics. Society for Computational Economics, Computing in Economics and Finance series, available at: http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/goffe99visualizing. html, 12 p.
34. Hinneburg, A., Keim, D., and Wawryniuk, M., (2003). Using projections to visually cluster high-dimensional data. Computing in Science & Engineering, v. 5, no.2, March/April, pp. 14-25.
35. Shneiderman, B., (2006). A telescope for high-dimensional data. Visualization Corner in Computing in Science & Engineering, v. 8, no.2, March/April, pp. 48-53.