Analisis cost-effectiveness analysis of different imaging for the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism;Analisis coste-efectividad de distintos métodos de diagnóstico por imagen del tromboembolismo pulmonar agudo

Revista Espanola de Salud Publica

Volumn 83, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 407-414

  Batallés, Stella Maris ^a,c   Villavicencio, Roberto Lisandro ^a   Pezzotto, Stella Maris ^b  

^a Sanatorio Parque e Instituto Cardiovascular de Rosario   (Argentina)

^b UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE ROSARIO   (Argentina)

^c Batallés Oroño 450 ^*  (Argentina)

Author keywords

Cost effectiveness; Diagnosis; Pulmonary; Thromboembolisms

Indexed keywords

ACUTE DISEASE; ARTICLE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ECONOMICS; HUMAN; LUNG EMBOLISM;

ACUTE DISEASE; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMANS; PULMONARY EMBOLISM;

EID: 69949157395     PISSN: 11355727     EISSN: 16969820     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s1135-57272009000300006     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Amoliga A, Matthay M, Matthay R. Pulmonary Thromboembolism and other pulmonary vascular diseases. En: George RS, Light RW, Matthay MA, et al. Chest Medicine: Essentials of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1995. pp. 130-135.
2. Fitzmaurice DA, Hobbi R. Tromboembolism. En: A compendium of the Best evidence for effective health care. London: Clinical Evidence, ACP/ASIM-BMJ Publishing Group eds.; 1999. pp. 130-135.
3. Wittram C. How I do it: CT pulmonary angiography. AJR. 2007; 188: 1255-1261.
4. Kazerooni E, Gross B. Radiología cardiopulmonar. 1e. ed. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Journal; 2006. pp. 581-597.
5. Dalen JE. When can treatment be withheld in patients with suspected pulmonary embolismo?. Arch Intern Med. 1993; 153: 1415-1418.
6. Paterson DI, Schwartzman K. Diagnostic test Incorporating Spiral CT for the Diagnosis of Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Cost- effectiveness Analysis. Chest. 2001; 119: 1791-1800.
7. Pineda LA, Hathwar VS, Grant BJ. Clinical suspicion of fatal pulmonary embolism. Chest. 2001; 120: 791-795
8. Quiroz R, Kucher N, Zou KH y col. Clinical Validity of a Negative Computed Tomography Scan in Patients With Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review. JAMA. 2005; 293(16): 2012-2017.
9. Kearon C. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. CMAJ. 2003; 168 (2): 183-194.
10. Eyer BA, Goodman LR, Washington L. Clinicians' Response to Radiologists' Reports of Isolated Subsegmental Pulmonary Embolism or Inconclusive Interpretation of Pulmonary Embolism Using MDCT. AJR. 2005; 184: 623-628.
11. Stein PD, Henry JW, Gottschalk A. Reassessment of pulmonary angiography for the dignosis of pulmonary embolism: relation of interpreter agreement to the order of the involved pulmonary arterial branch. Radiology. 1999; 210: 689-691
12. Uresandia F, Blanquerb J, Congetc F, de Gregorioc MA, Lobod JL, Oteroe R et al. Guía para el diagnóstico, tratamiento y seguimiento de la tromboembolia pulmonar. Arch Bronconeumol. 2004; 40 (12): 580-594
13. Oudkerk M, van Beek EJR, van Putten WLJ et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of various diagnostic test in the diagnostic management of pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med. 1993; 153: 947-954.
14. van Erkel AR, van Rossum AB, Bloem JL et al. Spiral CT angiography for suspected pulmonary embolismo: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Radiology. 1996; 201: 29-36.
15. van Rossum AB, Pattynama PMT, Ton ERTA et al. Pulmonary embolism: validation of sipral CT angiography in 149 patients. Radiology. 1996; 201: 467-470.
16. Mayo JR, Remy-Jardin M, Muller NL et al. Pulmonary embolism: prospective comparison of spiral CT with ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy. Radiology. 1997; 205: 447-452.
17. Gurney GW. No fooling around: direct visualization of pulmonary embolism (editorial). Radiology. 1993; 188: 618-619.
18. Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Deschildre F et al. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with sipral CT: comparison with pulmonary angiography and scintigraphy. Radiology. 1996; 200: 699-706. (Pubitemid 26282267)
19. Kavanagh EC, O'Hare A, Hargaden G et al. Risk of pulmonary embolism after negative MDCT pulmonary angiography findings. AJR 2004; 182:499-504.
20. Hull RD, Feldstein W, Stein PD et al. Cost-effectiveness of pulmonary embolism diagnosis. Arch Intern Med. 1996; 156: 68-72.
21. Doyle N, Ramirez M, Mastrobattista JM, Monga M, Wagner L, Gardner M. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a cos-effectiveness analysis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2004; 191:1019-1023.
22. Drummond M, O'Brien B, Stoddart G, Torrance G. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. 2nded. New York: Oxford Medical Publications; 1997. pp. 96-138.
23. The PIOPED Investigators. Value of ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism: results of the Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED). JAMA. 1990; 263: 2753-2759.
24. Goodman LR, Curtin JJ, Mewissen MW, et al. Detection of pulmonary embolism in patients with unresolved clinical and scintigraphic diagnosis: helical CT versus angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995; 164: 1369-1374.
25. Stein PD, Athanasoulis C, Alavi A, et al. Complications and validity of pulmonary angiography in acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation. 1992; 85: 462-468.
26. Turkstra F, Kuijer PMM, van Beek EJR, et al. Diagnostic utility of ultrasonography of leg veins in patients suspected of having pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med. 1997; 126: 775-781.
27. Wells PS, Ginsberg JS, Anderson DR, et al. Use of a clinical model for safe management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med. 1998; 129: 997-1005.
28. Cogo A, Lensing AWA, Wells P, et al. Noninvasive objective tests for the diagnosis of clinically suspected pulmonary embolism. Haemostasis. 1995; 25: 27-39.
29. Bautista Bautista E, Gutiérrez Fajardo P, Ramírez A, Hernández Hernández J. Diagnóstico de la tromboembolia pulmonar. Gac Méd Méx. 2007; 143 (1) : 19-24.