Reproducibility and accuracy of the ICDAS-II for occlusal caries detection

Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology

Volumn 37, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 399-404

  Diniz, Michele Baffi ^a,b   Rodrigues, Jonas Almeida ^a,b   Hug, Isabel ^b   De Cássia Loiola Cordeiro, Rita ^a   Lussi, Adrian ^b  

^a SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Dental caries; Early diagnosis; Professional training; Teeth

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL CARIES; HUMAN; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD; STATISTICAL MODEL;

DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CARIES ACTIVITY TESTS; HUMANS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 69949153726     PISSN: 03015661     EISSN: 16000528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2009.00487.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Lussi A, Imwinkelried S, Pitts NB, Longbotton C, Reich E. Performance and reproducibility of a laser fluorescence system for detection of occlusal caries in vitro. Caries Res 1999 33 : 261 266.
2. Jablonski-Momeni A, Stachniss V, Ricketts DN, Heinzel-Gutenbrunner M, Pieper K. Reproducibility and accuracy of the ICDAS-II for detection of occlusal caries in vitro. Caries Res 2008 42 : 79 87.
3. Ricketts DN, Ekstrand KR, Kidd EA, Larse T. Relating visual and radiographic ranked scoring system for occlusal caries detection to histological and microbiological evidence. Oper Dent 2002 27 : 231 237.
4. Bader JD, Shugars DA. A systematic review of the performance of a laser fluorescence device for detecting caries. J Am Dent Assoc 2004 135 : 1414 1426.
5. Bader JD, Shugars DA, Bonito AJ. Systematic review of selected dental caries diagnostic and management methods. J Dent Educ 2001 65 : 960 968.
6. Pitts NB, Stamm JW. Consensus Workshop on Caries Clinical Trials (ICW-CCT) - final consensus statements: Agreeing where the evidence leads. J Dent Res 2004 83 : C125 8.
7. Ekstrand KR, Martignon S, Ricketts DNJ, Qvist V. Detection and activity assessment of primary coronal caries lesions: a methodologic study. Oper Dent 2007 32 : 225 235.
8. Ismail AI, Sohn W, Tellez M, Amaya A, Sen A, Hasson H et al. The International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS): an integrated system for measuring dental caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2007 35 : 170 178.
9. Ismail AI, Sohn W, Tellez M, Willem JM, Betz J, Lepkowski J. Risk indicators for dental caries using the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS). Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2008 36 : 55 68.
10. Sohn W, Ismail A, Amaya A, Lepkowski J. Determinants of dental care visits among low-income African-American children. J Am Dent Assoc 2007 138 : 309 318.
11. Rodrigues JA, Hug I, Diniz MB, Lussi A. Performance of fluorescence methods, radiographic examination and ICDAS II on occlusal surfaces in vitro. Caries Res 2008 42 : 297 304.
12. Lussi A, Reich E. The influence of toothpastes and prophylaxis pastes on fluorescence measurements for caries detection. Eur J Oral Sci 2005 113 : 141 144.
13. Ekstrand KR, Ricketts DN, Kidd EA. Reproducibility and accuracy of three methods for assessment of demineralization depth of the occlusal surface: an in vitro examination. Caries Res 1997 31 : 224 231.
14. Lin LIK. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 1989 45 : 255 268.
15. Fleiss IL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions, 2nd edn. New York : Wiley, 1981 : 212 225.
16. Htoon HK, Peng LL, Huak CY. Assessment criteria for compliance with oral hygiene: application of ROC analysis. Oral Health Prev Dent 2007 5 : 83 8.
17. Obuchowski NA. Receiver operating characteristic curves and their use in radiology. Radiology 2003 229 : 3 8.
18. Sheehy EC, Brailford SR, Kidd EAM, Beighton D, Zoitopoulos L. Comparison between visual examination and a laser fluorescence system for in vivo diagnosis of occlusal caries. Caries Res 2001 35 : 421 426.
19. Diniz MB, Rodrigues JA, Paula AB, Cordeiro RCL. In vivo evaluation of laser fluorescence performance using different cut-off limits for occlusal caries detection. Laser Med Sci 2009 24 : 295 300.
20. Rodrigues JA, Diniz MB, Josgrilberg EB, Cordeiro RCL. In vitro comparison of laser fluorescence performance with visual examination for detection of occlusal caries in permanent and primary molars. Lasers Med Sci 2008 doi :.
21. Souza-Zaroni WC, Ciccone JC, Souza-Gabriel AE, Ramos RP, Corona SAM, Palma-Dibb RG. Validity and reproducibility of different combinations of methods for occlusal caries detection: an in vitro comparison. Caries Res 2006 40 : 194 201.
22. Fung L, Smales R, Ngo H, Moun G. Diagnostic comparison of three groups of examiners using visual and laser fluorescence methods to detect occlusal caries in vitro. Aust Dent J 2004 49 : 67 71.
23. Ekstrand KR, Kuzmina I, Bjorndal L, Thylstrup A. Relationship between external and histologic features of progessive stages of caries in the occlusal fossa. Caries Res 1995 29 : 243 250.