Bringing the outside in: A contextual analysis

Interacting and Organizing: Analyses of a Management Meeting

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 185-198

  Stohl, Cynthia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 69949145342     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203810736     Document Type: Chapter

References (17)

1. Anthony, L. (2003, September 12). The family fight: Planning to avoid it. The Edmonton Journal, p. A7.
2. Bélanger, J. M. (2004). Biography: Sam Steinberg. Retrieved September 7, 2005, from www.geocities.com/jeanmarc457plus/Steinberg.html
3. Francis, D. (1986). Controlling interest: Who owns Canada? Toronto, ON: Macmillan of Canada.
4. Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure, and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
5. Greenhouse, S. (2004, April 18).Wal-Mart, a nation unto itself. New York Times, p. B7.
6. Horowitz, S. (2004). Sam Steinberg’s non-lasting legacy. Retrieved September 7, 2005, from http://www.umass.edu/fambiz/steinberg_non_legacy.htm
7. Irwin, R. (1999). New business ventures and the entrepreneur (5th ed.). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
8. Janis, I. (1983). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
9. Monge, P., & Contractor, N. (2003). Theories of communication networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Poole, M. S., & Hirokawa, R. (1996). Introduction: Communication and group decision making. In R. Hirokawa & M. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision making (pp. 3–18). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Putnam, L. L., & Fairhurst, G. T. (2001). Discourse analysis in organization: Issues and concerns. In F. Jablin & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 235–268). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12. Putnam, L., & Stohl, C. (1990). Bona fide groups: A reconceptualization of groups in context. Communication Studies, 41, 248–265.
13. Putnam, L., & Stohl, C. (1996). Bona fide groups: An alternative perspective for communication and small group decision making. In R. Hirokawa & M. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision making (pp. 147–178). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. Roberts, M. (1992). The Sam Steinberg Ltd. Case. Boston: Harvard Business School.
15. Sanders, R. E., & Fitch, K. L. (2001). The actual practice of compliance-seeking. Communication Theory, 11, 263–289.
16. Stohl, C., & Putnam, L. L. (2003). Communication in bona fide groups: A retrospective and prospective account. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), Group communication in context: Studies of bona fide groups (2nd ed., pp. 399–414).Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. Sorge, A. (1983). Cultured organization. International Studies of Management and Organization, 13, 106–138.