Response surface modeling and optimization for production of ammonia from urea in a batch reactor

Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 462-470

  Sahu, J N ^a   Patwardhan, Anada V ^a   Meikap, B C ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

Ammonia; Flue gas conditioning; Hydrolysis of urea; Optimization; Response surface method

Indexed keywords

APPLICATION AREA; CENTRAL COMPOSITE; COEFFICIENT OF DETERMINATION; COMBINED EFFECT; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FLUE GAS CONDITIONING; FULL FACTORIAL; INITIAL FEED CONCENTRATION; OPERATING PARAMETERS; PRODUCTION CONDITION; RESPONSE SURFACE METHOD; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY; RESPONSE SURFACE MODELING; SATISFACTORY PREDICTIONS; SECOND-ORDER REGRESSION MODEL; STIRRING SPEED; UREA HYDROLYSIS;

AMMONIA; BATCH REACTORS; BOILERS; ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATORS; ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATORS; FLUE GASES; FLUES; FLY ASH; FOSSIL FUELS; HYDROLYSIS; METABOLISM; OPTIMIZATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; UREA;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE (ANOVA);

EID: 69949141107     PISSN: 19322135     EISSN: 19322143     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/apj.235     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. E.B. Dismukes. J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc., 1975; 25(2), 152-615.
2. R.M. Heck. Catal. Today, 1999; 53, 519-523.
3. F. Nakajima, I. Hamada. Catal. Today, 1996; 29, 109-115.
4. M. Devadas, O. Kröcher, M. Elsener, A. Wokaun, N. Söger, M. Pfeifer, Y. Demel, L. Mussmann. Appl. Catal., B: Environ., 2006; 67(3 -4), 187-196.
5. H. Bai. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 1994; 33, 1231-1236.
6. B. Brooks, W.A. Jessup, B.W. Macarthur, W.B. Sheats, US patent, Application No. 7,008,603B2, 2006.
7. H.W. Spencer, H.J. Peters, US patent, Application No. 6,436,359B1, 2002.
8. E. Jacob, E. Stiermann, US patent, Application No. 0045835A1, 2006.
9. H.B.H. Cooper, H.W. Spencer, US patent, Application No. US 6,730,280 B2, 2004.
10. D.G. Jones, US patent, Application No. US5,827,490, 1998.
11. M.A. Isla, H.A. Irazoqui, C.M. Genoud. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 1993; 32, 2662-2670.
12. B. Claudel, E. Brousse, G. Shehadeh. Thermochim. Acta, 1986; 102, 357-371.
13. M.Z. Alam, S.A. Muyibi, J. Toramae. J. Environ. Sci., 2007; 19, 674-677.
14. D.C. Montgomery. Design and Analysis of Experiments, 5th edn, John Wiley and Sons: New York, 2001.
15. R.H. Myers. Response Surface Methodology, Allyn and Bacon: New York, 1971.
16. J.N. Sahu, K. Mahalik, A.V. Patwardhan, B.C. Meikap. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2008; 47, 4689-4696.
17. J.N. Sahu, K. Mahalik, B.C. Meikap, A.V. Patwardhan. J. Hazard. Mater., 2008; DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.08.063.
18. V. Gunaraj, N. Murugan. J. Mater. Process. Technol., 1999; 88, 266-275.
19. G.E.P. Box, J.S. Hunter. Ann. Math. Stat., 1957; 28, 195-241.
20. G.E.P. Box, W.G. Hunter. J. Technometr., 1961; 3, 311-458.
21. T.J. Napier-Munn. The Central Composite Rotatable Design JKMRC, The University of Queensland: Brisbane, 2000.
22. G. Box, W.G. Hunter. Statistics for Experiments: An Introduction to Design. Data Analysis and Model Building, Wiley Interscience: New Jersey, USA, 1987.
23. R.H. Myers, D.C. Montgomery. Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, 2nd edn, John Wiley and Sons: New Jersey, USA, 2002.